Intruder vs Detectify
Nine of twelve models named Intruder first on the direct prompt; zero named Detectify. Intruder was named by twelve of the twelve models and Detectify by eleven and Intruder carries 32 labels and Detectify 29, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the attack surface management page.
By framing
IntruderFirst choices, of twelve modelsDetectify
The direct prompt
Intruder first, Detectify an alternative
9 of 12 modelsDetectify was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was named
3 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Intruder52%#1 of 11Detectify6%#3 of 11Intruder59%#1 of 13Detectify7%#3 of 13Intruder0%#– of 12Detectify0%#– of 12What the models said about Intruder
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“External tools (like Intruder or Detectify) focus on what the *internet* sees. Avoid using these if your primary goal is managing internal corporate network exposure” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Best value paid option: Intruder is frequently recommended for SMBs due to transparent pricing, comprehensive features, and a free tier that actually works” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Intruder is especially noted for its automation and suitability for the mid-market, making it a strong recommendation for most organizations in this category.” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Intruder is the safest all-around pick (transparent pricing, built for teams without dedicated security staff, strong SMB fit)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Detectify
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“External tools (like Intruder or Detectify) focus on what the *internet* sees. Avoid using these if your primary goal is managing internal corporate network exposure” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Detectify is described as web-focused, so it is not a fit for broader external exposure management needs.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Higher cost and more complex pricing structure compared to Intruder.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“such as Intruder, Detectify, or Attaxion, which typically cost between $10,000 and $50,000 per year” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Best For: B2B SaaS/software companies prioritizing web applications and API security.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I would recommend starting with Intruder or Detectify.” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.