AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › UpGuard Breach Risk Self-Service · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

UpGuard Breach Risk Self-Service

2Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. UpGuard Breach Risk Self-Service was named 1 time in DRP, where UpGuard BreachSight led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In drp · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named UpGuard Breach Risk Self-Service for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Digital risk protectionSecurity operations2%19 of 860%1under 10 labels · led by UpGuard BreachSight at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for UpGuard Breach Risk Self-Service yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated UpGuard Breach Risk Self-Service across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B10001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 label1
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 label1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“is the lowest transparent entry point for continuous external attack surface and breach monitoring” Muse Glimmer 30B · DRP · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as UpGuard Breach Risk Self-Service, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and UpGuard Breach Risk Self-Service was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence1 of 20Not among the top eight
Group-IB Digital Risk Protection1 of 20Not among the top eight
Guardz1 of 20Not among the top eight
Recorded Future1 of 20Not among the top eight
ZeroFox1 of 20Not among the top eight
runZero1 of 20Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named UpGuard Breach Risk Self-Service. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named UpGuard Breach Risk Self-Service and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

help.upguard.comYour site2
breachsense.com1
capterra.com1
cyberpress.org1
expertinsights.com1
g2.com1
getapp.com1
guardz.com1
guideflow.com1
runzero.com1

Nine of the eleven domain citations in answers naming UpGuard Breach Risk Self-Service came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

upguard.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, UpGuard Breach Risk Self-Service takes 2% of first choices and UpGuard BreachSight takes 22%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “digital risk protection platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “digital risk protection platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 319,457 a month
Searches its site ranks for
27,900 · 1,457 in the top three
Sites linking to it
12,517
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 65 text, 53 image, 2 video · 25 shown in the last 30 days

First shown February 2024, as UpGuard, Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 108 in the year, 12 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 19 of 86 in DRP
Segment leader
22%
UpGuard BreachSight
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
2 answers
Its own site cited
in 2 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on upguard.com
18,239
subdomains included
Content
1,938
counted in the table below
Documentation
310
Product · Integration
37 · 1
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog980982026-09-28GRC, SASE
News or press42882026-07-21
Comparison17032026-09-23SIEM
Glossary or explainer12332026-09-21GRC, SASE
Template or tool6412026-07-22
Conference or event5712026-09-21
Webinar or virtual event55undated
Case study43undated
Report or ebook1802021-04-06

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on upguard.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page upguard.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow UpGuard Breach Risk Self-Service

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

UpGuard Breach Risk Self-Service is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Monitor your attack surface and AI threats before you get compromised.
Price stated
Free trial upguard.com/product/breach-risk
Free plan or trial
Free trial upguard.com/product/breach-risk
Integrations claimed
400 upguard.com/product/breach-risk
Customers named
Games24x7Camp Systems
Not stated on the pages read
Certifications, hosting

What UpGuard Breach Risk Self-Service's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: upguard.com/product/breach-risk, help.upguard.com/en/what-is-upguard-breach-risks-threat-monitoring, help.upguard.com/en/what-is-included-in-upguards-self-service-breach-risk-plans, upguard.com/product/breach-risk/features, upguard.com/product/breach-risk/threat-monitoring. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when UpGuard Breach Risk Self-Service's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as UpGuard Breach Risk Self-Service, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for UpGuard Breach Risk Self-Service by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where UpGuard Breach Risk Self-Service is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name UpGuard Breach Risk Self-Service, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at upguard.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.