AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Network and edge › Load balancers › Enterprise › October 2026 Edition

Load balancers for enterprise buyers

Asked as “load balancer”, and as “application delivery controller”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 48 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the October 2026 Edition on October 4, 2026; its answers are read by the distilled judge (ai-indexes-judge-qwen3-14b-run3), not the claude-opus-5 judge of the earlier categories: how the two compare.
Standing · first-choice share
40%
Contested · HAProxy 12%
40F5 BIG-IP12HAProxy06Cloudflare Load Balancing42others

40% of first choices, contested.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
01F5 BIG-IP40%23%52endorsed leader
02HAProxy12%17%46accepted challenger
03Cloudflare Load Balancing6%0%13accepted challenger
04NGINX4%16%43accepted challenger
05Kemp LoadMaster4%9%11accepted challenger
Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10Azure Load Balancer0%38%26criticized challenger
09AWS Elastic Load Balancing0%32%34criticized challenger
06Citrix ADC0%23%26accepted challenger
08A10 Thunder ADC0%15%13accepted challenger
07Google Cloud Load Balancing Lab in the set0%15%20accepted challenger
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Cloud Load Balancing is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
F01
02
03
04
05
C06
G07
08
A09
A10
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01F5 BIG-IP40%
02HAProxy12%
03Cloudflare Load Balancing6%
04NGINX4%
05Kemp LoadMaster4%
06Citrix ADC0%
07Google Cloud Load Balancing0%
08A10 Thunder ADC0%
09AWS Elastic Load Balancing0%
10Azure Load Balancer0%

What they warned about

Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
F5 BIG-IP
23%
12 of 52 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Critical zero-days exist in F5 BIG-IP APM, tracked as CVE-2026-94127, which allows unauthenticated remote code execution” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
AWS Elastic Load Balancing
32%
11 of 34 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Large enterprises should avoid cloud-native load balancers from hyperscalers for complex, multi-cloud, or hybrid use cases” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Azure Load Balancer
38%
10 of 26 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Large enterprises should avoid cloud-native load balancers from hyperscalers for complex, multi-cloud, or hybrid use cases” Mistral Small, negative prompt
HAProxy
17%
8 of 46 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“open-source or lightweight software proxies (like basic NGINX or HAProxy) that are powerful but risky for enterprise governance ... **Why to Avoid:**” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1056 links across 256 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.

vendor site · Guideflow42 answers · 53 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Loadbalancer.org33 answers · 73 citations · 12 models
vendor site · F532 answers · 69 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Amazon22 answers · 26 citations · 12 models
vendor site · G221 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Xurrent21 answers · 21 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G220 answers · 26 citations · 8 models
20 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
vendor site · HAProxy18 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
16 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Radware13 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
13 answers · 17 citations · 9 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best load balancer”, “load balancer”, “load balancers”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
F5 BIG-IP40%1,600374
HAProxy haproxy.com
HAProxy 12%, HAProxy One 2%
15%1404,40042418,4104
Cloudflare parent site
Cloudflare Load Balancing 6%
6%64550,00010,897
Loadbalancer.org Enterprise ADC loadbalancer.org6%1504,966576
F5 f5.com
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager 4%, F5 2%
6%3727,10017,155178,423 company$51201
NGINX nginx.org4%14633,1004,36238,473
Kemp LoadMaster kemptechnologies.com4%33210935,090$127233
Progress Kemp LoadMaster4%502
NetScaler ADC netscaler.com2%5
AWS parent site
AWS Application Load Balancer 2%, AWS Elastic Load Balancing 0%
2%77368,000114,001

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 22 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (aws.amazon.com, f5.com, g2.com, kemptechnologies.com, loadbalancer.org). The first result for “best load balancer” is g2.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best load balancer for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which application delivery controller would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade load balancers and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best load balancer for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a load balancer. What should we look at?”Negative“Which load balancers should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5F5 BIG-IP
Four alternativesAWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Load Balancer, HAProxy, NGINX
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic ManagerChanged
Three alternativesA10 Thunder ADC, Kemp LoadMaster, NetScaler
F5 BIG-IP
Three alternativesCitrix ADC, HAProxy, NGINX
HAProxy, NGINX
One alternativeAzure Load Balancer
against: AWS Elastic Load Balancing
no first choiceagainst: Citrix NetScaler ADC, F5 BIG-IP, Progress Kemp LoadMaster, VMware Avi Load Balancer
GPT-5.4 miniF5 BIG-IP
Seven alternativesApplication Gateway, Application Load Balancer, Azure Load Balancer, Cloud Load Balancing, HAProxy, NGINX, Network Load Balancer
F5 BIG-IPHeld
Two alternativesA10, F5 NGINX
against: Citrix ADC
F5 BIG-IP
Four alternativesA10 Thunder ADC, Citrix ADC, HAProxy, NGINX
HAProxy
Two alternativesF5 BIG-IP, NGINX
against: AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Load Balancer, Google Cloud’s load balancing
no first choiceagainst: Azure Basic Load Balancer, Citrix NetScaler ADC, F5 BIG-IP, Gateway Load Balancer
Gemini 3.5 FlashVMware Avi Load Balancer
Seven alternativesAWS Elastic Load Balancing, Cloudflare Load Balancing, F5 BIG-IP, F5 NGINX, Google Cloud Load Balancing, HAProxy, Progress Kemp LoadMaster
F5 BIG-IPChanged
Four alternativesCloudflare Load Balancing, NetScaler, Progress Kemp LoadMaster, Radware Alteon
F5 BIG-IP
Seven alternativesAWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure App Gateway, Citrix ADC, GCP Cloud Load Balancing, HAProxy, NGINX, VMware Avi Load Balancer
HAProxy, Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Two alternativesF5 NGINX, Loadbalancer.org Enterprise ADC
against: AWS ALB, Azure Application Gateway, GCP Cloud Load Balancing
no first choiceagainst: F5 BIG-IP, HAProxy, Kemp LoadMaster, NGINXagainst: AWS Route 53, Azure Traffic Manager, Citrix ADC, F5 BIG-IP, HAProxy, NGINX, VMware Avi Load Balancer
Perplexity SonarHAProxy
Four alternativesAzure Load Balancer, Cloudflare Load Balancing, Load Balancer Enterprise ADC, Progress Kemp LoadMaster
F5 BIG-IPChanged
Three alternativesCitrix ADC, NetScaler ADC, Radware Alteon
F5 BIG-IP
Seven alternativesAWS, Akamai Connected Cloud, Azure, Cloudflare Load Balancing, Google Cloud, HAProxy, Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Cloudflare Load Balancingagainst: AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Google Cloud Load Balancingno first choicenothing named
Grok 4.1 FastF5 BIG-IP, HAProxy
Four alternativesAWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Application Gateway, Google Cloud Load Balancing, NGINX
F5 BIG-IPChanged
One alternativeCitrix ADC
against: A10 Thunder ADC, Radware Alteon
F5 BIG-IP
Eight alternativesA10 Thunder ADC, AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Load Balancer/Application Gateway, Citrix ADC, Google Cloud Load Balancing, HAProxy, NGINX, Radware AppWall
Loadbalancer.org Enterprise ADC
Three alternativesAWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Load Balancer, GCP
against: Citrix ADC, F5 BIG-IP
no first choice
Five alternativesAWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Load Balancer, F5 BIG-IP, Google Cloud Load Balancing, NGINX
against: AWS Classic Load Balancer, AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Load Balancer/Application Gateway, Community HAProxy, GCP Cloud Load Balancing
Mistral SmallF5 BIG-IP, Kemp LoadMaster
Three alternativesAzure Load Balancer, Google Cloud Load Balancing, HAProxy
F5 BIG-IPChanged
Five alternativesA10 Thunder ADC, AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Application Gateway, Citrix ADC, NGINX
no first choiceLoadbalancer.org Enterprise ADCagainst: AWS ALB, Azure Load Balancer, Google Cloud Load Balancingno first choiceagainst: AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Load Balancer, F5 BIG-IP, Google Cloud Load Balancer
DeepSeek V4 FlashF5 BIG-IP
Five alternativesAWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Load Balancer, Google Cloud Load Balancing, HAProxy, Progress Kemp LoadMaster
F5 BIG-IP PlatformChanged
Three alternativesA10 Thunder ADC, Fortinet FortiADC, NetScaler
F5 BIG-IP
Four alternativesA10 Thunder ADC, Citrix NetScaler ADC, HAProxy, NGINX
HAProxy One
One alternativeLoadbalancer.org Enterprise ADC
against: AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Load Balancer, DigitalOcean Load Balancers, F5 BIG-IP
no first choice
Five alternativesAWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Application Gateway, HAProxy, Kemp LoadMaster, NGINX
against: F5 BIG-IP
against: AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Load Balancer, Citrix ADC, F5 BIG-IP iSeries, GCP Cloud Load Balancing, HAProxy, Legacy Kemp LoadMaster Hardware Models, Microsoft Network Load Balancing
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceCloudflare Load Balancing
Three alternativesAmazon Elastic Load Balancer, HAProxy, NGINX
no first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashF5 BIG-IP, F5 Distributed Cloud
Four alternativesAmazon Web Services, HAProxy, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, NGINX
F5 BIG-IPChanged
Three alternativesAWS: Application Load Balancer (ALB) + Global Accelerator, Azure: Azure Front Door + Load Balancer, NGINX
F5 BIG-IP
Five alternativesAWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Application Gateway, GCP Cloud Load Balancing, HAProxy, NGINX
HAProxy, Kemp LoadMaster
One alternativeF5 BIG-IP
against: AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Load Balancer, Google Cloud HTTP LB
no first choiceagainst: A10 Thunder ADC, AWS Application Load Balancer, Azure Load Balancer, Cisco ACE, Citrix ADC, F5 BIG-IP, Google Cloud Load Balancing, HAProxy, NGINX, NetScaler
Kimi K2F5
Six alternativesAWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Load Balancer, Google Cloud Load Balancing, HAProxy, NGINX, VMware Avi Load Balancer
F5 BIG-IPChanged
Two alternativesA10 Thunder ADC, Citrix ADC
F5 BIG-IP
Seven alternativesA10 Thunder ADC, AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Load Balancer/Application Gateway, Citrix ADC, GCP Cloud Load Balancing, HAProxy, NGINX
Loadbalancer.org Enterprise ADC
Two alternativesAmerican Cloud Load Balancing, Civo Load Balancers
against: AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Load Balancer, F5 BIG-IP, GCP native load balancers, HAProxy, NGINX
no first choiceagainst: AVI Networks, AWS Classic Load Balancer, AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Load Balancer, Citrix NetScaler ADC, GCP Cloud Load Balancing, HAProxy, NGINX, Snapt
GLM 4.7 FlashXF5 BIG-IP
Three alternativesCitrix ADC, HAProxy, NGINX
against: AWS
F5 BIG-IPHeld
Two alternativesCitrix NetScaler ADC, Radware Alteon
Citrix ADC, F5 BIG-IP
Four alternativesAWS Application Load Balancer, AWS Network Load Balancer, HAProxy, NGINX
NGINX
One alternativeF5 BIG-IP
against: AWS ALB
no first choiceagainst: AWS, Azure, F5 BIG-IP, GCP, HAProxy, NGINX
MiniMax M2.5F5 BIG-IP
Two alternativesAWS Elastic Load Balancing, F5 NGINX
Citrix NetScaler ADC, F5 BIG-IPChanged
One alternativeA10 Thunder ADC
F5 BIG-IP
Three alternativesCitrix ADC, HAProxy, NGINX
F5 BIG-IP
Two alternativesHAProxy, Kemp LoadMaster
against: Citrix NetScaler ADC
no first choicenothing named
GPT-6 LunaAWS Application Load Balancer
Three alternativesAWS Network Load Balancer, Azure Application Gateway, Google Cloud Application Load Balancer
against: F5 BIG-IP, HAProxy, NGINX
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic ManagerChanged
Three alternativesAzure Application Gateway, Citrix ADC, NetScaler
no first choice
Five alternativesA10 Thunder ADC, F5 BIG-IP LTM, HAProxy, NGINX, NetScaler ADC
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
One alternativeApplication Load Balancer
no first choiceagainst: A10, Azure Application Gateway, Azure Load Balancer, BIG-IP, Citrix ADC, Community Kubernetes Ingress NGINX
Muse Glimmer 30BF5 BIG-IP
Two alternativesHAProxy, NGINX
NetScaler ADCChanged
One alternativeF5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager
F5 BIG-IP
Seven alternativesA10 Networks Thunder, AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Google Cloud Load Balancing, HAProxy, Kemp LoadMaster / Progress Kemp, Microsoft Azure, NGINX Plus from F5
against: Citrix NetScaler ADC
Cloudflare Load Balancing, DigitalOcean Regional Load Balancers
Two alternativesCivo, Loadbalancer.org Enterprise Prime
against: AWS Elastic Load Balancing
no first choiceagainst: AWS, Application Gateway, Azure, GCP, Traffic Manager
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-05 01:52no05 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-04 22:21no04 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-05 01:50yes1125 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-04 23:59yes153 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-05 01:57yes2110 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-04 22:29yes54 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-04 23:40yes2137 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-05 01:36yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-04 22:37no024 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-05 00:05yes1015 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-04 23:04yes19103 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 01:15yes1026 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-05 00:56yes410 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-04 22:49yes1515 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-05 00:51yes99 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-05 00:53yes64 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-05 01:50yes620 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-05 00:02yes173 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-05 01:11yes238 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-05 00:17no08 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-05 01:36yes2438 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-05 01:36yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-04 23:27no031 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-05 00:47yes1733 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-04 23:16yes951 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-04 22:12yes520 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-05 00:38yes313 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-05 01:21yes1921 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-05 01:30yes99 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-05 00:57yes68 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-04 23:56yes2731 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-05 01:31yes186 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-05 00:06yes2013 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-04 22:19yes1413 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-05 00:27yes2372 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-04 22:38yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-05 00:15yes1021 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-04 22:23yes1832 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-05 01:14yes15132 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-04 23:45yes1033 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-05 00:43yes624 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-04 23:38yes1428 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-05 01:19no04 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-04 23:50yes24 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-05 00:05yes2526 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-04 23:49yes133 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-04 22:40yes1811 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-05 00:22yes1029 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-05 00:14yes2440 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-04 23:32yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-04 23:10yes1088 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-04 23:50yes2123 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-05 00:47yes2158 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 00:56yes1757 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-04 22:20yes315 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-05 00:21yes2128 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-05 00:02yes1913 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-05 01:00no06 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-05 01:54no017 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-04 22:17yes184 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-05 01:37yes179 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-05 01:50no09 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-05 01:24yes2544 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-05 01:15yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-05 00:23yes541 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-04 22:17yes2531 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-05 00:59yes2442 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 01:18no058 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-04 22:59yes423 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-04 22:53yes2529 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-04 23:06yes3815 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-04 23:40yes58 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-04 22:44yes1930 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-04 22:20yes193 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-05 01:36yes2112 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-05 01:30yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-05 01:10yes2270 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-04 22:27yes54 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-05 00:15no031 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-05 00:59yes2430 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-05 00:24yes2248 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 00:47yes2059 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-05 00:14yes419 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-05 00:23yes2128 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
A10 Networks read as A10 Thunder ADC
A10 Networks Thunder ADC read as A10 Thunder ADC
AWS ALB/ELB read as AWS Elastic Load Balancing
AWS ALB/ELB (Elastic Load Balancing) read as AWS Elastic Load Balancing
AWS ALB/NLB read as AWS Elastic Load Balancing
AWS ELB read as AWS Elastic Load Balancing
AWS ELB/ALB read as AWS Elastic Load Balancing
AWS Elastic Load Balancer (ELB/ALB/NLB) read as AWS Elastic Load Balancing
Akamai read as Akamai Connected Cloud
Azure LB read as Azure Load Balancer
Citrix NetScaler read as Citrix ADC
Citrix NetScaler (Cloud Software Group) read as Citrix ADC
Cloudflare read as Cloudflare Load Balancing
Cloudflare (Enterprise) read as Cloudflare Load Balancing
Cloudflare Enterprise read as Cloudflare Load Balancing
DigitalOcean read as DigitalOcean Load Balancers
GCP Cloud LB read as GCP Cloud Load Balancing
GCP LB read as GCP Cloud Load Balancing
GCP Load Balancer read as GCP Cloud Load Balancing
GCP Load Balancing read as GCP Cloud Load Balancing
Google Cloud LB read as Google Cloud Load Balancing
Kemp read as Kemp LoadMaster
Loadbalancer.org read as Loadbalancer.org Enterprise ADC
Loadbalancer.org Enterprise read as Loadbalancer.org Enterprise ADC
Loadbalancer.org's Enterprise ADC read as Loadbalancer.org Enterprise ADC
Radware read as Radware Alteon
Unresolved, counted raw
AWS: Application Load Balancer (ALB) + Global Accelerator
Amazon Elastic Load Balancer
American Cloud Load Balancing
Azure App Gateway
Azure Traffic Manager
Azure: Azure Front Door + Load Balancer
BIG-IP
Civo Load Balancers
Cloudflare LB
Community HAProxy
Community Kubernetes Ingress NGINX
Consul Connect
DigitalOcean Regional Load Balancers
F5 BIG-IP Platform
F5 BIG-IP iSeries
GCP native load balancers
Google Cloud HTTP LB
Google Cloud’s load balancing
HAProxy One (HAProxy Enterprise)
Kemp Technologies
Legacy Kemp LoadMaster Hardware Models
Load Balancer Enterprise ADC
Loadbalancer Enterprise ADC
Loadbalancer.org Enterprise Prime
Loadbalancer.org enterprise appliances/software
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
Microsoft Network Load Balancing (NLB / WNLB)
NGINX Plus from F5
Progress Kemp
Radware's Application Delivery Solutions
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← DNS filteringManaged DNS →