AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › F5 BIG-IP · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

F5 BIG-IP

112Judge labels
19First choices
54Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
40% in Load balancers for enterprise buyers
Rank 93 of 94 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 55% of its 31 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of F5 BIG-IP →
By buyer segmentAn enterprise product: leader at enterprise, not named at small business or mid-market.
In load balancers · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named F5 BIG-IP for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Load balancersNetwork and edge0%93 of 9455%31criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for F5 BIG-IP yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated F5 BIG-IP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501102
GPT-5.4 mini01113
Gemini 3.5 Flash01034
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.2000022
Mistral Small10001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00033
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00112
Kimi K201023
GLM 4.7 FlashX02024
MiniMax M2.501012
GPT-6 Luna00112
Muse Glimmer 30B00112

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct16 labels9
Paraphrase26 labels9
Comparative23 labels12not counted in share
Budget-constrained11 labels1
Scale-constrained10 labelsNone
Negative26 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative112 labels in all, every segment counted; 19 of the 31 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For flexibility and performance: NGINX or F5.” Mistral Small · Load balancers · comparative prompt · first choice
“Most feature-rich enterprise solution ... Enterprise hybrid/multi-cloud | F5 BIG-IP or NGINX Plus” Kimi K2 · Load balancers · comparative prompt · alternative
“consider cloud-agnostic solutions (like HAProxy, F5 BIG-IP, or Cloudflare Load Balancer) to avoid vendor lock-in” MiniMax M2.5 · Load balancers · negative prompt · alternative
“F5 BIG-IP is the legacy enterprise standard for data centers and compliance-heavy organizations” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Load balancers · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“What I'd avoid for mid-sized B2B - F5 BIG-IP: ... over-engineered, expensive, and feature-heavy for mid-market needs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Load balancers · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“CISA has repeatedly listed F5 BIG-IP in exploited-vulnerability notices, and older / unsupported versions are especially risky.” GPT-5.4 mini · Load balancers · negative prompt · soft negative
“Very expensive (base units start at ~$30,000–$65,000+; full bundles can exceed $140,000). Complex to operate and license.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Load balancers · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Be cautious with hardware appliances that have known firmware vulnerabilities; patch or replace them.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Load balancers · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as F5 BIG-IP, over the 112 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and F5 BIG-IP was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
HAProxy74 of 11213Not among the top eight
NGINX70 of 1125Not among the top eight
Citrix ADC48 of 1120Not among the top eight
AWS Elastic Load Balancing46 of 1127Not among the top eight
Azure Load Balancer33 of 1120Not among the top eight
Cloudflare Load Balancing28 of 1121Not among the top eight
Google Cloud Load Balancing27 of 1120Not among the top eight
Kemp LoadMaster19 of 1123Not among the top eight
Progress Kemp LoadMaster18 of 11211Not among the top eight
Traefik18 of 1121Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named F5 BIG-IP. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 95 of the 112 answers that named F5 BIG-IP and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com43
f5.com41
loadbalancer.org40
g2.com30
kemptechnologies.com30
radware.com30
devopsschool.com29
nomios.com27
xurrent.com25
aws.amazon.com23

No domain is on file for F5 BIG-IP, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where F5 BIG-IP stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
1,600 a month (“f5 big-ip”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
374 a month
Its own site
No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 93 of 94 in load balancers
Segment leader
29%
HAProxy
First choices
19 across its categories
Named in
112 answers
Its own site cited
No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as F5 BIG-IP

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as F5 BIG-IP; a claim can dispute any of them.
F5 BIG-IP (Local Traffic Manager - LTM) 1F5 BIG-IP / F5 ADSP 1F5 BIG-IP / F5 Distributed Cloud 1F5 BIG‑IP 1F5 Big-IP 1

Follow F5 BIG-IP

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when F5 BIG-IP's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as F5 BIG-IP, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for F5 BIG-IP by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where F5 BIG-IP is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name F5 BIG-IP, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.