AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Network and edge › October 2026 Edition

Data center networking

Asked as “data center switching platform”, and as “data center network fabric”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 44 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the October 2026 Edition on October 4, 2026; its answers are read by the distilled judge (ai-indexes-judge-qwen3-14b-run3), not the claude-opus-5 judge of the earlier categories: how the two compare.
Standing · first-choice share
27%
Contested · HPE Aruba Networking CX Series 7%
27Arista Networks07HPE Aruba Networking CX Series07Juniper Apstra59others

27% of first choices, contested.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Arista Networks27%13%45accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 27% now.
02Cisco5%32%28criticized challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 5% now.
03HPE Aruba2%8%12accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
04Cisco Nexus2%19%16accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
07Cisco ACI0%58%12criticized challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
06VMware NSX0%44%16criticized challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
05Juniper Networks0%19%26accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All six head-to-head pages: the top four products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
H03
04
05
06
07
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Arista Networks27%
02Cisco5%
03HPE Aruba2%
04Cisco Nexus2%
05Juniper Networks0%
06VMware NSX0%
07Cisco ACI0%

What they warned about

Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Cisco
32%
9 of 28 labels negative · 8 of 14 models
“Some Gartner clients report higher rates of issues compared to other vendors, typically around product complexity, software quality, and support timeliness” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
VMware NSX
44%
7 of 16 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Don't over-engineer with ACI/NSX. Cisco ACI and VMware NSX are powerful but carry significant complexity and cost” DeepSeek V4 Flash, paraphrase prompt
Arista Networks
13%
6 of 45 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“Cisco ACI, Nexus 9000 with extensive features enabled, or overly rich SD‑N stacks can introduce configuration‑driven bugs if not fully tested.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Cisco ACI
58%
7 of 12 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“What I'd Avoid: | **Cisco ACI** | Overly complex and expensive for mid-sized environments” Kimi K2, paraphrase prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1161 links across 308 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.

vendor site · Cisco44 answers · 85 citations · 13 models
vendor site · G228 answers · 35 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Juniper26 answers · 42 citations · 12 models
26 answers · 39 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Arista23 answers · 37 citations · 12 models
22 answers · 35 citations · 10 models
vendor site · HPE20 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
18 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Nokia17 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
14 answers · 40 citations · 9 models
vendor site · FitGap14 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
12 answers · 16 citations · 8 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best data center switching platform”, “data center networking platforms”, “data center switching platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Arista EOS arista.com
Arista Networks 27%, Arista EOS 5%, Arista Converged Cloud Fabric 5%
36%10133,10027846,8983
Juniper juniper.net
Juniper Apstra 7%, Juniper’s QFX-based data center fabric, managed with Apstra 2%
9%262106267,308 company0
HPE Aruba Networking CX Series7%
Dell dell.com
Dell 2%, Dell Technologies 2%, Dell PowerSwitch S Series 2%
7%64368,000213,97013,697,880$10,867636
Cisco cisco.com5%199165,00048,3525,114,808$683912
Cumulus Linux5%26052
FS.com5%
Cisco parent site
Cisco Nexus 2%, Cisco Nexus Hyperfabric 2%
5%46165,00048,352
Edgecore edge-core.com
Edgecore 2%, Edgecore Networks 2%
5%61,900955,154
HPE parent site
HPE Aruba 2%
2%2827,1005,522

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 23 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (cisco.com, gartner.com, hpe.com, reddit.com). The first result for “best data center switching platform” is gartner.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best data center switching platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which data center network fabric would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top data center networking platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best data center switching platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a data center switching platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which data center networking platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceCumulus Linux
Three alternativesOpen Network Operating System, OpenDaylight, OpenSwitch
no first choiceagainst: CyberPower's PowerPanel Enterprise DCIM platform, Dataprobe's iBoot Power Distribution Unit
GPT-5.4 miniArista Networks
Two alternativesCisco Nexus, Juniper QFX
no first choiceChangedArista Networks
Four alternativesCisco, HPE, Juniper Networks, NVIDIA Spectrum-X
against: Dell
Juniper’s QFX-based data center fabric, managed with Apstra
One alternativeArista EOS-based leaf-spine design
against: Cisco Nexus 9000
no first choiceagainst: Arista Networks
Gemini 3.5 FlashArista Networks
Two alternativesDell Technologies, HPE Juniper Networking
against: Cisco Systems
Arista NetworksHeld
One alternativeHPE Juniper
against: Cisco
Arista Networks
Four alternativesCisco, Juniper Networks, NVIDIA Spectrum-X, SONiC
Dell PowerSwitch S Series
Four alternativesArista Networks, Celestica, Delta, Edgecore
against: Cisco Nexus, FS.com, MikroTik CRS Series
Arista Networks
Four alternativesArista CloudVision, Dell Technologies, HPE Juniper, HPE Juniper Apstra
against: Cisco, Cisco Nexus Dashboard, Whitebox/DIY SONiC
against: Apstra, Cisco ACI, Cumulus Linux, HPE, Juniper Networks, Mist AI Ops, SONiC, VMware NSX
Perplexity SonarCisco Nexus
Two alternativesArista Networks, HPE Data Center Switches
Juniper ApstraChanged
Three alternativesArista Converged Cloud Fabric, Cisco Nexus fabric / Nexus Hyperfabric, Nokia Data Center Fabric
Cisco
Six alternativesArista Networks, Console Connect, HPE Aruba, Juniper Networks, Megaport, VMware NSX
Arista Networks
One alternativeFortinet FortiSwitch - Data Center
against: HPE Aruba
no first choiceagainst: Cisco, Fortinet fabric-integrated switches, Juniper Networks, Riverbed SteelConnect CX, Ruckus
Grok 4.1 FastHPE Aruba Networking CX Series
Two alternativesCisco Nexus, Juniper Networks
against: Arista Networks
Arista NetworksChanged
Two alternativesCisco Nexus, Juniper Apstra
Arista EOS, Cisco Nexus
Three alternativesApstra, Juniper QFX, NVIDIA Spectrum/Cumulus
FS.com
Three alternativesDiscount Cisco Nexus, Extreme Networks, HPE Aruba
against: Cisco Nexus, Huawei Data Center Networking
no first choiceagainst: Cisco, Juniper Networks, Netgear Orbi, VMware NSX
Mistral SmallCisco
Three alternativesArista Networks, Huawei Data Center Networking, Juniper Networks
no first choiceChangedno first choiceCumulus Linux
Five alternativesArista Networks, Dell, Dell PowerSwitch, Edge-Core, Juniper EX4600
no first choiceagainst: Cisco ACI, Dell Fabric Manager, Huawei iMaster NCE-Fabric, VMware NSX
DeepSeek V4 FlashHPE Aruba CX Series
Two alternativesExtreme Networks, Juniper QFX Series
against: Cisco Nexus 9000 Series
Arista Converged Cloud FabricChanged
Two alternativesCisco, HPE Aruba
against: Juniper Networks, VMware NSX
Arista EOS + CloudVision, Cisco ACI
Two alternativesJuniper Apstra, NVIDIA Spectrum-X
Dell, Edgecore
Two alternativesArista Networks, Cisco Nexus
against: Aruba Instant On, MikroTik CRS Series, Ubiquiti UniFi
Arista Networks
Two alternativesHPE Aruba, Juniper Networks
against: Cisco, NVIDIA Spectrum-X
against: Cisco Catalyst 9000 Series, Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) & Firepower Management Center, NVIDIA InfiniBand, Nexus 9000 series, VMware NSX
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceArista Networks
One alternativeHPE Aruba EdgeConnect
against: Huawei Data Center Networking
no first choiceagainst: Cisco
Qwen 3.7 FlashCisco, HPE Aruba
One alternativeJuniper EX Series
Arista EOS, Juniper ApstraChanged
Two alternativesPica8 Picos, SONiC
against: Cisco ACI, VMware NSX
no first choiceDelta Electronics, FS.com
Three alternativesArista Networks, Dell Networking, HPE Aruba
against: Cisco
Arista Networks
Two alternativesCumulus Networks, Juniper Networks
against: Cisco ACI or Nexus
against: Arista Networks, Blue Coat Systems, Cisco ACI, Cisco Nexus 7000 Series, Dell PowerConnect, Extreme Networks, Foundry Networks, VMware NSX-T / VDC Stack
Kimi K2HPE Aruba Networking CX Series
Two alternativesCisco Nexus 9000, Juniper QFX Series
against: Arista Networks 7000 Series
Juniper ApstraChanged
Three alternativesArista CloudVision, Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller, Cisco Nexus Hyperfabric
against: Cisco ACI, VMware NSX
no first choiceMikroTik CRS Series
Six alternativesArista Networks, Celestica, Cisco Nexus 3000 Series, Dell PowerSwitch Series, Delta Networks, Edgecore
Arista Networks
Three alternativesCisco, HPE Aruba, Juniper Networks
against: Cisco ACI, Cisco Catalyst 2960-CX series, Cisco Catalyst 3650 series, Cisco HyperFlex Data Platform, Cisco Nexus with proprietary approaches, Community SONiC, EMC/Dell S4048T, RecoverPoint Gen 6, XtremIO X2, HPE, Juniper QFX Line, Juniper QFX5200, ACX6160
GLM 4.7 FlashXHPE Aruba Networking CX Series
Three alternativesCisco Catalyst 9200/9300 Series, Cisco Nexus 9300 Series, Dell PowerSwitch S Series
Dell TechnologiesChanged
Four alternativesCisco Nexus, Extreme Networks, HPE, Juniper Networks
no first choiceDell Networking S5224F-ON / S5248F-ON
Three alternativesCisco Catalyst 9200L Series, H3C S5130S Series, H3C S6850 High-Density Data Center Switch
no first choiceagainst: Arista CloudVision, Arista Networks, Cisco, Cisco Catalyst Center, Cisco FMC, Cisco Identity Services Engine, Juniper Contrail, Juniper Junos‑Space, Juniper Networks
MiniMax M2.5no first choiceArista Converged Cloud Fabric, Cisco Nexus HyperfabricChanged
One alternativeHPE Juniper
against: Cisco ACI
Cisco Catalyst Center
Four alternativesArista CloudVision, Huawei iMaster NCE-Fabric, Juniper Apstra, VMware NSX
Arista Networks
One alternativeHPE Aruba
against: Huawei Data Center Networking
no first choiceagainst: Arista Networks, Cisco, NVIDIA Spectrum-X
GPT-6 LunaArista EOS
Three alternativesCisco Nexus 9000, CloudVision, HPE Juniper QFX + Apstra
no first choiceChanged
Three alternativesArista EOS + CloudVision, Cisco Nexus, Juniper with Apstra
Arista Networks, Cisco
Five alternativesApstra, Dell Enterprise SONiC, HPE Juniper, NVIDIA Spectrum-X, SONiC-based systems
Edgecore switch with Enterprise SONiC support
One alternativeJuniper QFX5120
no first choiceagainst: ACI, Cisco Nexus, NSX, Nexus
Muse Glimmer 30BHPE Aruba EdgeConnect
Two alternativesArista Networks, Juniper Networks
against: Cisco Nexus 9000, Cisco Nexus Hyperfabric
Arista NetworksChanged
Two alternativesAruba CX, Cisco
Arista Networks, Cisco
Three alternativesApstra, Juniper Networks, VMware NSX
Edgecore Networks, SONiC
Three alternativesFS.com, MikroTik CRS Series, Ubiquiti UniFi
against: Arista Networks, Cisco Catalyst
no first choiceagainst: Check Point Software, D-Link, Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-05 00:34no04 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-05 00:24yes45 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-05 01:32yes1335 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-04 23:04yes203 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-05 00:57yes2111 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-05 01:56yes129 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-05 01:16yes2370 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-05 00:40yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-04 22:58yes1036 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-05 00:26yes2532 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-05 00:21yes2453 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 00:23yes561 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-04 23:23yes315 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-05 00:46yes2233 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-05 00:01no05 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-05 01:30no04 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-05 00:26yes624 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-05 00:16yes184 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-04 22:22yes2410 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-05 00:41no03 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-05 00:34yes2441 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-05 01:32yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-05 00:56yes23142 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-04 22:52yes2318 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-04 22:10yes2584 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 00:07yes550 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-05 01:23yes318 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-05 00:07yes1421 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-04 23:56yes1813 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-05 00:03yes811 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-04 22:42yes1425 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-04 23:50yes174 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-05 00:40yes2422 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-05 01:30yes2514 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-05 00:57yes2546 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-05 01:21yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-04 22:34yes2056 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-05 01:38yes2534 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-05 00:38yes2542 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 01:57yes1931 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-04 23:47yes734 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-05 00:24yes1533 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-05 01:14no05 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-05 00:45yes44 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-04 22:33yes2733 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-04 23:35yes323 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-04 22:31yes229 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-05 00:40yes157 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-04 23:57yes2548 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-04 23:36yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-04 22:35yes1034 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-05 00:20yes2019 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-05 01:30yes2534 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 00:13yes923 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-04 23:48yes215 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-05 00:59yes2227 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-05 01:53yes1810 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-04 22:18no07 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-05 01:36yes530 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-04 22:49yes145 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-05 00:17yes209 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-05 00:56no010 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-05 01:51yes2581 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-05 00:42yes510 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-04 22:32no034 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-04 23:42yes2434 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-05 01:22yes1548 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 01:55yes524 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-05 00:59yes217 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-05 00:43yes1425 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-04 22:55yes188 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-05 01:20yes57 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-05 01:50yes1726 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-05 01:47yes243 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-05 00:00yes2312 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-05 01:47yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-04 23:42yes2555 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-05 00:24yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-05 01:35no037 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-05 01:11yes2436 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-05 01:02yes1545 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-04 23:34yes1524 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-05 00:19yes119 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-05 00:44yes1528 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Arista read as Arista Networks
Arista (CloudVision) read as Arista Networks
Arista (EOS + CloudVision) read as Arista Networks
Huawei read as Huawei Data Center Networking
Juniper read as Juniper Networks
Juniper (Apstra) read as Juniper Networks
Juniper (QFX/EX) read as Juniper Networks
Juniper (e.g., QFX, Apstra) read as Juniper Networks
MikroTik read as MikroTik CRS Series
NVIDIA read as NVIDIA Spectrum-X
NVIDIA (Spectrum) read as NVIDIA Spectrum-X
Ubiquiti read as Ubiquiti UniFi
Unresolved, counted raw
ACI
AWS Direct Connect
Arista EOS-based leaf-spine design
Arista Networks 7000 Series
Arista Networks Platform
Arista with CloudVision
Azure ExpressRoute
Big Switch
Blue Coat Systems (Symantec/Radware)
Check Point Software
Cisco ACI or Nexus
Cisco Catalyst
Cisco Catalyst 2960-CX series
Cisco Catalyst 3650 series
Cisco FMC
Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) & Firepower Management Center (FMC)
Cisco HyperFlex Data Platform
Cisco Nexus 7000 Series
Cisco Nexus fabric / Nexus Hyperfabric
Cisco Nexus with proprietary approaches
CloudVision
Community SONiC
Console Connect
Cruz Fabric Controller
Cumulus Networks
CyberPower's PowerPanel Enterprise DCIM platform
Dataprobe's iBoot Power Distribution Unit
Dell Enterprise SONiC
Dell Networking (PowerSwitch)
Dell Networking S5224F-ON / S5248F-ON
Dell PowerSwitch Series
Delta Networks
Discount Cisco Nexus
EMC/Dell S4048T, RecoverPoint Gen 6, XtremIO X2
EVPN/VXLAN
Edgecore switch with Enterprise SONiC support
Enterprise SONiC distributions
Equinix Fabric
Extreme
Fortinet FortiSwitch - Data Center
Fortinet fabric-integrated switches
Foundry Networks (Broadcom)
H3C S5130S Series
H3C S6850 High-Density Data Center Switch
HP ProCurve/Aruba 2530 Series
HPE Aruba CX Series (8000/9300)
HPE Aruba Networking CX
HPE Data Center Switches
HPE Juniper QFX + Apstra
HPE-Aruba
Huawei Quidway S1700
Juniper EX Series
Juniper EX4600
Juniper Junos‑Space
Juniper QFX Line
Juniper QFX5120
Juniper QFX5200, ACX6160
Juniper with Apstra
Juniper’s QFX-based data center fabric, managed with Apstra
Leaf-Spine Architecture
Mellanox Spectrum
Mist AI Ops
NVIDIA Cumulus
NVIDIA InfiniBand (Quantum-X series)
NVIDIA Spectrum/Cumulus
Netgear Orbi
Nexus 9000 series
Nexus Dashboard with NX-OS
Nexus Dashboard with NX-OS VXLAN EVPN
Nokia SR Linux
Open Network Operating System (ONOS)
OpenSwitch
Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS
SONiC-based systems
VMware NSX-T / VDC Stack
Whitebox/DIY SONiC
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.

Follow Data center networking

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this category moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

← CDNDDI and IPAM →