AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Network and edge › Load balancers › Progress Kemp LoadMaster vs Cloudflare Load Balancing
Load balancers · October 2026 Edition

Progress Kemp LoadMaster vs Cloudflare Load Balancing

Five of fourteen models named Progress Kemp LoadMaster first on the direct prompt; two named Cloudflare Load Balancing. Progress Kemp LoadMaster was named by ten of the fourteen models and Cloudflare Load Balancing by twelve and Progress Kemp LoadMaster carries 20 labels and Cloudflare Load Balancing 25, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Progress Kemp LoadMaster

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Cloudflare Load Balancing

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share27%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#5A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels2025A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Progress Kemp LoadMaster reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.HAProxy was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. HAProxy vs Progress Kemp LoadMaster · HAProxy vs Cloudflare Load Balancing · Progress Kemp LoadMaster vs NGINX

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the load balancers page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Progress Kemp LoadMasterFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCloudflare Load Balancing
Direct52
Paraphrase90
Comparative00
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Progress Kemp LoadMaster and Cloudflare Load Balancing were named in the same answer seventeen times, of the 35 answers naming Progress Kemp LoadMaster and the 71 naming Cloudflare Load Balancing. In those answers Cloudflare Load Balancing took the first choice two times and Progress Kemp LoadMaster eight.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Progress Kemp LoadMaster and Cloudflare Load Balancing stood in it.
ModelDirectPKParaphrasePKComparativePKBudget-constrainedPKScale-constrainedPKNegativePK
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 FlashPKPK
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 FastPKPK
Mistral SmallPK
DeepSeek V4 FlashPKPKPK
Llama 4 MaverickPK
Qwen 3.7 FlashPK
Kimi K2PKPK
GLM 4.7 FlashXPKPK
MiniMax M2.5PKPK
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30BPKPK
PK Progress Kemp LoadMaster Cloudflare Load BalancingPK first choicePK named as an alternativePK argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Progress Kemp LoadMaster on the left and Cloudflare Load Balancing on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Progress Kemp LoadMaster and Cloudflare Load Balancing stood in it.

Progress Kemp LoadMaster first, Cloudflare Load Balancing an alternative

5 of 14 modelsCloudflare Load Balancing was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
DeepSeek V4 FlashProgress Kemp LoadMaster alternatives: AWS Application Load Balancer, Cloudflare Load Balancing, HAProxy, NGINX
Kimi K2HAProxy, Progress Kemp LoadMaster alternatives: F5 NGINX
GLM 4.7 FlashXNGINX, Progress Kemp LoadMaster alternatives: F5 BIG-IP, HAProxy
MiniMax M2.5Progress Kemp LoadMaster alternatives: AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Load Balancer, Cloudflare Load Balancing, GCP Cloud Load Balancing, NGINX
Muse Glimmer 30BProgress Kemp LoadMaster alternatives: AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Load Balancer, Cloudflare Load Balancing, HAProxy, NGINX

Cloudflare Load Balancing first, Progress Kemp LoadMaster an alternative

2 of 14 modelsProgress Kemp LoadMaster was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashCloudflare Load Balancing alternatives: AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Application Gateway, HAProxy, NGINX, Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Mistral SmallCloudflare Load Balancing alternatives: HAProxy, Progress Kemp LoadMaster, VMware Avi Load Balancer

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Grok 4.1 FastHAProxy, NGINX alternatives: AWS ALB, Azure Load Balancer, Cloudflare Load Balancing, GCP Cloud Load Balancing, Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Qwen 3.7 FlashAWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Application Gateway, NGINX alternatives: Cloudflare Load Balancing, HAProxy
GPT-6 LunaAWS Application Load Balancer alternatives: Azure Application Gateway, Azure Load Balancer, Cloudflare Load Balancing, Google Cloud Application Load Balancer, Google Cloud Network Load Balancer

Neither was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Load Balancer, NGINX alternatives: Citrix ADC, F5, HAProxy
GPT-5.4 miniApplication Load Balancer alternatives: Azure Load Balancer, Google Cloud's Application Load Balancer, Network Load Balancer
Perplexity SonarHAProxy alternatives: AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Application Gateway
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Cloudflare Load Balancing leads by three points.
Cloudflare Load Balancing11%#3 of 13
Progress Kemp LoadMaster9%#– of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Progress Kemp LoadMaster leads at mid-market.
Progress Kemp LoadMaster27%#2 of 13
Cloudflare Load Balancing4%#5 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Cloudflare Load Balancing leads at enterprise.
Cloudflare Load Balancing6%#3 of 10
Progress Kemp LoadMaster4%#– of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Progress Kemp LoadMaster

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Best All-Rounder (Hybrid/Virtual/On-Premises): Progress Kemp LoadMaster ... is widely considered the gold standard for the mid-market.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Progress Kemp LoadMaster as the best application delivery controller for a mid-sized B2B company” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Progress Kemp LoadMaster (now part of Progress) is the one I would suggest as the default starting point.” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Cloudflare Load Balancing

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Ideal for companies needing global traffic steering, failover, and strong DDoS protection... making it a good fit for B2B companies with a global customer base” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Best For: B2B SaaS companies, multi-cloud setups, and security-first organizations... Combines global routing with top-tier security at the edge” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Best if you want managed service simplicity: Cloudflare Load Balancing ... though managed services can become expensive as usage grows” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.