AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Network and edge › Load balancers › Azure Load Balancer vs Azure Application Gateway
Load balancers · October 2026 Edition

Azure Load Balancer vs Azure Application Gateway

One of fourteen models named Azure Load Balancer first on the direct prompt; one named Azure Application Gateway. Azure Load Balancer was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Azure Application Gateway by eight and Azure Load Balancer carries 29 labels and Azure Application Gateway 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Azure Load Balancer

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Azure Application Gateway

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share2%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate14%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#7#8A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels2910A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Azure Load Balancer reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.HAProxy was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. HAProxy vs Azure Load Balancer · HAProxy vs Azure Application Gateway · Progress Kemp LoadMaster vs Azure Load Balancer

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the load balancers page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Azure Load BalancerFirst choices, of fourteen modelsAzure Application Gateway
Direct11
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained002 against Azure Load Balancer
Scale-constrained00
Negative002 against Azure Load Balancer
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Azure Load Balancer and Azure Application Gateway stood in it.
ModelDirectALParaphraseALComparativeALBudget-constrainedALScale-constrainedALNegativeAL
Claude Haiku 4.5AL
GPT-5.4 miniAL
Gemini 3.5 FlashAL
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 FastALAL
Mistral SmallALAL
DeepSeek V4 FlashALALAL
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 FlashAL
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5ALALAL
GPT-6 LunaALAL
Muse Glimmer 30BALAL
AL Azure Load Balancer Azure Application GatewayAL first choiceAL named as an alternativeAL argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Azure Load Balancer on the left and Azure Application Gateway on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Azure Load Balancer and Azure Application Gateway stood in it.

Azure Load Balancer first, Azure Application Gateway not the choice

1 of 14 modelsAzure Application Gateway was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Load Balancer, NGINX alternatives: Citrix ADC, F5, HAProxy

Azure Application Gateway first, Azure Load Balancer not the choice

1 of 14 modelsAzure Load Balancer was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Qwen 3.7 FlashAWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Application Gateway, NGINX alternatives: Cloudflare Load Balancing, HAProxy

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniApplication Load Balancer alternatives: Azure Load Balancer, Google Cloud's Application Load Balancer, Network Load Balancer
Gemini 3.5 FlashCloudflare Load Balancing alternatives: AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Application Gateway, HAProxy, NGINX, Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Perplexity SonarHAProxy alternatives: AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Application Gateway
Grok 4.1 FastHAProxy, NGINX alternatives: AWS ALB, Azure Load Balancer, Cloudflare Load Balancing, GCP Cloud Load Balancing, Progress Kemp LoadMaster
MiniMax M2.5Progress Kemp LoadMaster alternatives: AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Load Balancer, Cloudflare Load Balancing, GCP Cloud Load Balancing, NGINX
GPT-6 LunaAWS Application Load Balancer alternatives: Azure Application Gateway, Azure Load Balancer, Cloudflare Load Balancing, Google Cloud Application Load Balancer, Google Cloud Network Load Balancer
Muse Glimmer 30BProgress Kemp LoadMaster alternatives: AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Load Balancer, Cloudflare Load Balancing, HAProxy, NGINX

Neither was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Mistral SmallCloudflare Load Balancing alternatives: HAProxy, Progress Kemp LoadMaster, VMware Avi Load Balancer
DeepSeek V4 FlashProgress Kemp LoadMaster alternatives: AWS Application Load Balancer, Cloudflare Load Balancing, HAProxy, NGINX
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Kimi K2HAProxy, Progress Kemp LoadMaster alternatives: F5 NGINX
GLM 4.7 FlashXNGINX, Progress Kemp LoadMaster alternatives: F5 BIG-IP, HAProxy

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Azure Load Balancer leads by six points.
Azure Load Balancer6%#6 of 13
Azure Application Gateway0%#11 of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Azure Load Balancer2%#7 of 13
Azure Application Gateway2%#8 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Azure Load Balancer0%#10 of 10
Azure Application Gateway0%#– of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Azure Load Balancer

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Cloud-native load balancers (AWS ELB, Azure LB, GCP LB) ... may lack deep packet inspection, advanced routing rules, or cross-cloud consistency” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Traefik is rated higher for value, with reviewers expressing greater satisfaction with its pricing compared to Azure Load Balancer.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · soft negative
“excellent within their ecosystems but can lead to vendor lock-in” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“Cloud-native load balancers (AWS ALB, Azure LB) are often the best fit” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Azure Load Balancer for network-layer distribution, especially in Azure-native environments.” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · alternative
“AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Load Balancer, or Google Cloud Load Balancing” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · alternative

What the models said about Azure Application Gateway

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Use the Application Gateway on Azure or Network Load Balancer (NLB) on AWS if you have strict compliance requirements” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“If everything is already in Azure and you prefer a managed service, Azure Application Gateway is a natural fit.” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ALB/NLB) or Azure's Application Gateway run directly within your cloud architecture.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.