| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Load balancers | Network and edge | 4% | 5 of 94 | 0% | 25 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Ideal for companies needing global traffic steering, failover, and strong DDoS protection... making it a good fit for B2B companies with a global customer base” Mistral Small · Load balancers · direct prompt · first choice
“Best For: B2B SaaS companies, multi-cloud setups, and security-first organizations... Combines global routing with top-tier security at the edge” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Load balancers · direct prompt · first choice
“Best if you want managed service simplicity: Cloudflare Load Balancing ... though managed services can become expensive as usage grows” Perplexity Sonar · Load balancers · budget prompt · alternative
“Need global, anycast traffic steering and fast failover without running infrastructure → Cloudflare Load Balancing.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Load balancers · direct prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 64 of the 71 answers that named Cloudflare Load Balancing and are not a share of its labels.
251 of the 251 domain citations in answers naming Cloudflare Load Balancing came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Cloudflare Load Balancing's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: developers.cloudflare.com/load-balancing, blog.cloudflare.com/introducing-load-balancing-analytics, blog.cloudflare.com/unimog-cloudflares-edge-load-balancer, blog.cloudflare.com/introducing-spectrum-with-load-balancing, blog.cloudflare.com/eliminating-hardware-with-load-balancing-and-cloudflare-one. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cloudflare Load Balancing's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cloudflare Load Balancing, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Cloudflare Load Balancing by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: