Load balancers · October 2026 Edition
Traefik vs Azure Application Gateway
Zero of fourteen models named Traefik first on the direct prompt; one named Azure Application Gateway. Traefik was named by ten of the fourteen models and Azure Application Gateway by eight and Traefik carries 21 labels and Azure Application Gateway 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share2%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#8A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels2110A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Traefik reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.HAProxy was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. HAProxy vs Traefik · HAProxy vs Azure Application Gateway · Progress Kemp LoadMaster vs Traefik
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the load balancers page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
TraefikFirst choices, of fourteen modelsAzure Application Gateway
Direct01
Paraphrase00
Comparative10
Budget-constrained10
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Traefik and Azure Application Gateway stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | |||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
Traefik Azure Application Gateway first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Traefik on the left and Azure Application Gateway on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Traefik and Azure Application Gateway stood in it.
Azure Application Gateway first, Traefik not the choice
1 of 14 modelsTraefik was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Qwen 3.7 FlashAWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Application Gateway, NGINX alternatives: Cloudflare Load Balancing, HAProxy
Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashCloudflare Load Balancing alternatives: AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Application Gateway, HAProxy, NGINX, Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Perplexity SonarHAProxy alternatives: AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Application Gateway
GPT-6 LunaAWS Application Load Balancer alternatives: Azure Application Gateway, Azure Load Balancer, Cloudflare Load Balancing, Google Cloud Application Load Balancer, Google Cloud Network Load Balancer
Neither was named
10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Load Balancer, NGINX alternatives: Citrix ADC, F5, HAProxy
GPT-5.4 miniApplication Load Balancer alternatives: Azure Load Balancer, Google Cloud's Application Load Balancer, Network Load Balancer
Grok 4.1 FastHAProxy, NGINX alternatives: AWS ALB, Azure Load Balancer, Cloudflare Load Balancing, GCP Cloud Load Balancing, Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Mistral SmallCloudflare Load Balancing alternatives: HAProxy, Progress Kemp LoadMaster, VMware Avi Load Balancer
DeepSeek V4 FlashProgress Kemp LoadMaster alternatives: AWS Application Load Balancer, Cloudflare Load Balancing, HAProxy, NGINX
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Kimi K2HAProxy, Progress Kemp LoadMaster alternatives: F5 NGINX
GLM 4.7 FlashXNGINX, Progress Kemp LoadMaster alternatives: F5 BIG-IP, HAProxy
MiniMax M2.5Progress Kemp LoadMaster alternatives: AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Load Balancer, Cloudflare Load Balancing, GCP Cloud Load Balancing, NGINX
Muse Glimmer 30BProgress Kemp LoadMaster alternatives: AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Load Balancer, Cloudflare Load Balancing, HAProxy, NGINX
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Traefik leads by one point.
Traefik1%#10 of 13Azure Application Gateway0%#11 of 13Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Traefik2%#6 of 13Azure Application Gateway2%#8 of 13Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Traefik0%#– of 10Azure Application Gateway0%#– of 10What the models said about Traefik
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“For most small businesses today, Traefik offers the best balance of cost (free), ease of management (auto-discovery), and functionality” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Cloud-native champion - designed for containers ... Kubernetes/container-heavy | Traefik or NGINX Ingress” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you run Docker/Kubernetes: Go with Traefik. It integrates seamlessly and reduces operational overhead.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · alternative
What the models said about Azure Application Gateway
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Use the Application Gateway on Azure or Network Load Balancer (NLB) on AWS if you have strict compliance requirements” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“If everything is already in Azure and you prefer a managed service, Azure Application Gateway is a natural fit.” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ALB/NLB) or Azure's Application Gateway run directly within your cloud architecture.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · alternative
Also compared
HAProxy vs TraefikHAProxy vs Azure Application GatewayProgress Kemp LoadMaster vs TraefikProgress Kemp LoadMaster vs Azure Application GatewayNGINX vs TraefikNGINX vs Azure Application GatewayAWS Elastic Load Balancing vs TraefikAWS Elastic Load Balancing vs Azure Application GatewayCloudflare Load Balancing vs TraefikCloudflare Load Balancing vs Azure Application GatewayTraefik vs Azure Load BalancerAzure Load Balancer vs Azure Application GatewayAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full load balancers standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.