AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Network and edge › Load balancers › HAProxy vs Cloudflare Load Balancing
Load balancers · October 2026 Edition

HAProxy vs Cloudflare Load Balancing

Three of fourteen models named HAProxy first on the direct prompt; two named Cloudflare Load Balancing. HAProxy was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Cloudflare Load Balancing by twelve and HAProxy carries 58 labels and Cloudflare Load Balancing 25, so the shares are not directly comparable.

HAProxy

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Cloudflare Load Balancing

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share29%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate5%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#5A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels5825A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, HAProxy reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Progress Kemp LoadMaster was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. HAProxy vs Progress Kemp LoadMaster · HAProxy vs NGINX · HAProxy vs AWS Elastic Load Balancing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the load balancers page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
HAProxyFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCloudflare Load Balancing
Direct321 against HAProxy
Paraphrase10
Comparative20
Budget-constrained100
Scale-constrained10
Negative202 against HAProxy
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, HAProxy and Cloudflare Load Balancing were named in the same answer fifty-nine times, of the 174 answers naming HAProxy and the 71 naming Cloudflare Load Balancing. In those answers Cloudflare Load Balancing took the first choice twelve times and HAProxy twelve.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where HAProxy and Cloudflare Load Balancing stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
HAProxy Cloudflare Load Balancing first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, HAProxy on the left and Cloudflare Load Balancing on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where HAProxy and Cloudflare Load Balancing stood in it.

HAProxy first, Cloudflare Load Balancing an alternative

3 of 14 modelsCloudflare Load Balancing was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Perplexity SonarHAProxy alternatives: AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Application Gateway
Grok 4.1 FastHAProxy, NGINX alternatives: AWS ALB, Azure Load Balancer, Cloudflare Load Balancing, GCP Cloud Load Balancing, Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Kimi K2HAProxy, Progress Kemp LoadMaster alternatives: F5 NGINX

Cloudflare Load Balancing first, HAProxy an alternative

2 of 14 modelsHAProxy was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashCloudflare Load Balancing alternatives: AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Application Gateway, HAProxy, NGINX, Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Mistral SmallCloudflare Load Balancing alternatives: HAProxy, Progress Kemp LoadMaster, VMware Avi Load Balancer

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Load Balancer, NGINX alternatives: Citrix ADC, F5, HAProxy
DeepSeek V4 FlashProgress Kemp LoadMaster alternatives: AWS Application Load Balancer, Cloudflare Load Balancing, HAProxy, NGINX
Qwen 3.7 FlashAWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Application Gateway, NGINX alternatives: Cloudflare Load Balancing, HAProxy
GLM 4.7 FlashXNGINX, Progress Kemp LoadMaster alternatives: F5 BIG-IP, HAProxy
MiniMax M2.5Progress Kemp LoadMaster alternatives: AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Load Balancer, Cloudflare Load Balancing, GCP Cloud Load Balancing, NGINX
GPT-6 LunaAWS Application Load Balancer alternatives: Azure Application Gateway, Azure Load Balancer, Cloudflare Load Balancing, Google Cloud Application Load Balancer, Google Cloud Network Load Balancer
Muse Glimmer 30BProgress Kemp LoadMaster alternatives: AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Azure Load Balancer, Cloudflare Load Balancing, HAProxy, NGINX

Neither was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniApplication Load Balancer alternatives: Azure Load Balancer, Google Cloud's Application Load Balancer, Network Load Balancer
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
HAProxy leads by nine points.
HAProxy20%#1 of 13
Cloudflare Load Balancing11%#3 of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
HAProxy leads by twenty-five points.
HAProxy29%#1 of 13
Cloudflare Load Balancing4%#5 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
HAProxy leads by six points.
HAProxy12%#2 of 10
Cloudflare Load Balancing6%#3 of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about HAProxy

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Open‑source solutions that are no longer actively maintained (e.g., very old versions of HAProxy, Nginx...) | Unpatched CVEs” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“consider a third-party option like F5 or HAProxy, but that adds more ops overhead” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · soft negative
“running them on under-powered virtual machines (like a $5/mo VPS) creates a bottleneck” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“If you have standard web apps or APIs: Go with HAProxy. It has the broadest adoption, most documentation, and best performance for the price (free).” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“The performance leader — handles millions of requests per second with sub-millisecond latency... HAProxy is the performance benchmark.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Fastest and most stable - used by GitHub, Reddit, Stack Overflow ... High-performance, mission-critical | HAProxy” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Cloudflare Load Balancing

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Ideal for companies needing global traffic steering, failover, and strong DDoS protection... making it a good fit for B2B companies with a global customer base” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Best For: B2B SaaS companies, multi-cloud setups, and security-first organizations... Combines global routing with top-tier security at the edge” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Best if you want managed service simplicity: Cloudflare Load Balancing ... though managed services can become expensive as usage grows” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.