ETL and ELT for enterprise buyers
Asked as “ETL tool”, and as “data pipeline and ELT platform”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 45 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
49%
Clear leader
49Fivetran27Integrate.io04Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud20others
49% of first choices, clear leader.
Since September 2026▼−1Since September 2026: 49% → 47%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Fivetran held the lead, −1 point on 49%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Airbyte36%Contested▼−3Since September 2026: 36% → 33%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-market
Fivetran40%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Fivetran (37%) replaces Airbyte (32% then, 26% now), 11 points clear, past the 11-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseFivetran49%Clear leader▼−1Since September 2026: 49% → 47%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This page
Airbyte36%Contested▼−3Since September 2026: 36% → 33%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketFivetran40%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Fivetran (37%) replaces Airbyte (32% then, 26% now), 11 points clear, past the 11-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseFivetran49%Clear leader▼−1Since September 2026: 49% → 47%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Fivetran49%30%61criticized default▼−1Since September 2026: 49% → 47%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.49% → 47%
Fivetran49%30%61criticized default▼−1Since September 2026: 49% → 47%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.49% → 47%02
Integrate.io27%10%20accepted challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 28% → 29%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.28% → 29%
Integrate.io27%10%20accepted challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 28% → 29%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.28% → 29%03
Matillion4%21%38accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 5% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 5%
Matillion4%21%38accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 5% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 5%04
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud4%28%32criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 8% → 5%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 5%
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud4%28%32criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 8% → 5%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 5%05
Informatica PowerCenter4%45%20criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 3% → 3%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.3% → 3%
Informatica PowerCenter4%45%20criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 3% → 3%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.3% → 3%06
Talend2%38%48criticized challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.3% → 0%
Talend2%38%48criticized challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.3% → 0%07
IBM DataStage2%39%18criticized challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 0% → 3%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 3%
IBM DataStage2%39%18criticized challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 0% → 3%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 3%Show the eight products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
15
Stitch0%50%14criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Stitch0%50%14criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%14
Oracle Data Integrator0%36%11criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Oracle Data Integrator0%36%11criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%11Airbyte0%29%31criticized challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 0%
Airbyte0%29%31criticized challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 0%13
Hevo Data0%23%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Hevo Data0%23%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%10Azure Data Factory0%19%27accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
09
AWS Glue0%17%30accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
AWS Glue0%17%30accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%12
Databricks Lakeflow0%15%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Databricks Lakeflow0%15%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%08
dbt0%4%25accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
dbt0%4%25accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Fivetran vs TalendFivetran vs dbtFivetran vs MeltanoFivetran vs Apache NiFiAirbyte vs Hevo DataAirbyte vs StitchAirbyte vs TalendAirbyte vs dbtAirbyte vs MeltanoAirbyte vs Apache NiFiHevo Data vs StitchHevo Data vs TalendHevo Data vs dbtHevo Data vs MeltanoHevo Data vs Apache NiFiStitch vs TalendStitch vs dbtStitch vs MeltanoStitch vs Apache NiFiTalend vs dbtTalend vs MeltanoTalend vs Apache NiFidbt vs Meltanodbt vs Apache NiFiMeltano vs Apache NiFi
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809A10
1112131415Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Fivetran49%
Fivetran49%02Integrate.io27%
Integrate.io27%03Matillion4%
Matillion4%04Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud4%
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud4%05Informatica PowerCenter4%
Informatica PowerCenter4%06Talend2%
Talend2%07IBM DataStage2%
IBM DataStage2%08dbt0%
dbt0%09AWS Glue0%
AWS Glue0%10Azure Data Factory0%
11Airbyte0%
Airbyte0%12Databricks Lakeflow0%
Databricks Lakeflow0%13Hevo Data0%
Hevo Data0%14Oracle Data Integrator0%
Oracle Data Integrator0%15Stitch0%
Stitch0%What they warned about
Five of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Talend38%
18 of 48 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 10 hard negative
“Price increases have forced many long-time customers to reconsider their data architecture, and the architectural roots are described as less aligned with pipeline-as-code” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Fivetran30%
18 of 61 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“**Verdict**: Good for smaller scale, poor predictability at enterprise volume” Kimi K2, budget prompt
Informatica PowerCenter45%
9 of 20 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Legacy ETL stacks such as Informatica, Talend and Azure Data Factory are repeatedly cited as slowing teams down... generally seen as a lock-in / maintenance-first platform.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud28%
9 of 32 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“**Verdict**: High cost, low predictability, especially with thousands of users” Kimi K2, budget prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1114 links across 214 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 6 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Integrate.io55 answers · 174 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Fivetran41 answers · 79 citations · 14 models
vendor site · Hevo Data40 answers · 75 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Airbyte35 answers · 61 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Estuary26 answers · 33 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Coupler.io23 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Domo21 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Weld20 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G219 answers · 33 citations · 8 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Zoho15 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Stacksync15 answers · 15 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
26 answers · 11 models
22 answers · 9 models
22 answers · 11 models
19 answers · 8 models
18 answers · 10 models
16 answers · 10 models
14 answers · 11 models
14 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best etl tool”, “etl tool”, “etl tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fivetran fivetran.com | 49% | 186 | 18,100 | 476 | 41,501 | $126 | 97 | 5 |
| Integrate.io integrate.io | 27% | 43 | 110 | 2 | 53,336 | 3 | 1 | |
| Informatica PowerCenter informatica.com Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud 4%, Informatica PowerCenter 4% | 9% | 259 | 720 | 98 | 73,321 | 120 | ||
| Matillion matillion.com | 4% | 76 | 2,900 | 132 | 25,032 | 0 | ||
| Cleo Integration Cloud cleo.com | 2% | 182 | 170 | 1 | 63,575 | 41 | ||
| Talend qlik.com | 2% | 117 | 2,900 | 235 | 705,831 | 55 | ||
| IBM parent site IBM DataStage 2% | 2% | 28 | 201,000 | 34,098 | ||||
| IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration | 2% | |||||||
| Informatica Data Integration | 2% | |||||||
| dbt getdbt.com | 0% | 85 | 5,590 | 75,753 | 12 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 19 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (airbyte.com, fivetran.com, hevodata.com, integrate.io). The first result for “best etl tool” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best ETL tool for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which data pipeline and ELT platform would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade ETL tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best ETL tool for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a ETL tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which ETL tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceFivetranChangedno first choiceIntegrate.ioagainst: Fivetranno first choiceagainst: Azure Data Factory, Google Cloud Dataflow, Informatica PowerCenter, Integrate.io, Stitch, StreamSets, Talend
Four alternatives
Azure Data Factory, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Talend, dbtTwo alternatives
Hevo Data, SnapLogicGPT-5.4 miniFivetranMatillionChangedno first choiceMatillionno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Airbyte, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, MatillionThree alternatives
Apache Airflow, Fivetran, dbtSeven alternatives
AWS Glue, Airbyte, Azure Data Factory, Fivetran, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Matillion, TalendOne alternative
Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudGemini 3.5 FlashFivetranFivetranHeldagainst: Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft SQL Server Integration ServicesInformatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Talendagainst: IBM DataStageIntegrate.ioagainst: Alteryx, Fivetran, dbtFivetranagainst: AWS Glue, Airbyte, Apache Airflow, Azure Data Factory, Coupler.io, Fivetran, Google Cloud Dataflow, IBM DataStage, Informatica PowerCenter, Make, Meltano, Microsoft SQL Server Integration Services, Oracle Data Integrator, Prefect, Stitch, Talend, Zapier
Seven alternatives
AWS Glue, Apache Airflow, Azure Data Factory, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Integrate.io, Matillion, dbtFour alternatives
Airbyte, Apache Airflow, Matillion, dbtSix alternatives
AWS Glue, Fivetran, Matillion, Microsoft Azure Data Factory, Microsoft Fabric, dbtFive alternatives
AWS Glue, Airbyte, Apache Airflow, Azure Data Factory, dbtFour alternatives
AWS Glue, Airbyte, Azure Data Factory, Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudPerplexity SonarInformatica Data IntegrationFivetranChangedno first choiceIntegrate.ioagainst: Fivetranno first choiceagainst: IBM DataStage, Informatica PowerCenter, Oracle Data Integrator
Two alternatives
Azure Data Factory, FivetranOne alternative
Databricks LakeflowTen alternatives
Alteryx, Boomi Data Integration, Celigo, Databricks Lakeflow, Fivetran, Google BigQuery, Hevo Data, IBM StreamSets, Informatica Data Integration and Engineering, MatillionGrok 4.1 FastInformatica Intelligent Data Management CloudFivetranChangedagainst: AWS Glue, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Matillion, TalendInformatica PowerCenterIntegrate.ioagainst: AWS Glue, Fivetran, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Matillion, TalendIntegrate.ioagainst: Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloudagainst: Airbyte, Apache Airflow, Apache NiFi, Databricks Lakeflow, Fivetran, Microsoft SQL Server Integration Services, Pentaho Data Integration, Singer, Stitch, Talend
Six alternatives
AWS Glue, Google Cloud Data Fusion, IBM DataStage, Matillion, SAP Data Intelligence, TalendThree alternatives
Apache Airflow, Astronomer, dbtFive alternatives
AWS Glue, Azure Data Factory, IBM DataStage, Matillion, TalendOne alternative
AirbyteFour alternatives
Airbyte, Fivetran, Matillion, TalendMistral SmallCleo Integration Cloud, IBM webMethods Hybrid IntegrationFivetranChangedagainst: Airbyte, MatillionInformatica Intelligent Data Management CloudIntegrate.ioagainst: Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, SAP Data Servicesno first choiceagainst: Airbyte
Three alternatives
Hevo Data, Matillion ETL, MuleSoftThree alternatives
Databricks Lakeflow, Snowflake, dbtFour alternatives
AWS Glue, Azure Data Factory, Oracle Data Integrator, TalendDeepSeek V4 FlashFivetranFivetranHeldagainst: AWS Glue, Azure Data Factory, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Matillion, Talendno first choiceIntegrate.ioagainst: Airbyte, Databricks Lakeflow, Fivetran, Google Cloud Dataflow, Matillionno first choiceagainst: Airbyteagainst: Airbyte, Azure Data Factory, Fivetran, Informatica PowerCenter, Meltano, Oracle Data Integrator, Singer, Stitch, Talend
Four alternatives
Airbyte, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Matillion, TalendThree alternatives
Airbyte, Snowflake, dbtEight alternatives
AWS Glue, Azure Data Factory, Fivetran, Google Cloud Data Fusion, IBM DataStage, Informatica PowerCenter, Matillion, TalendTwo alternatives
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, TalendThree alternatives
Fivetran, Integrate.io, MatillionLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceFivetranChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
AWS Glue, Airbyte, Dagster, MatillionOne alternative
AWS GlueQwen 3.7 FlashFivetranFivetranHeldno first choiceIntegrate.ioagainst: Fivetran, Matillion, MuleSoft, Talendno first choiceagainst: Fivetran, Hevo Data, Old-School Informatica, Pentaho Data Integration, Stitch, Talend
Three alternatives
Azure Data Factory, Informatica PowerCenter, MatillionThree alternatives
Airbyte, Matillion, dbtKimi K2Fivetran, Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudFivetranChangedIBM DataStage, Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudIntegrate.ioagainst: AWS Glue, Fivetran, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Talendno first choiceagainst: IBM DataStage, Informatica PowerCenter, Talendagainst: Fivetran, IBM DataStage, Informatica PowerCenter, Oracle Data Integrator, Oracle GoldenGate, Singer, Stitch, Talend
Two alternatives
Talend, dbtFour alternatives
Airbyte, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Informatica PowerCenter, dbtSeven alternatives
AWS Glue, Azure Data Factory, Fivetran, Google Cloud Dataflow, Matillion, Stitch, TalendGLM 4.7 FlashXIBM DataStage, Informatica PowerCenteragainst: Integrate.ioFivetranChangedno first choiceIntegrate.ioagainst: Airbyte, Fivetran, Hevo Data, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Matillion, Stitch, Talendno first choiceagainst: IBM DataStage, Informatica PowerCenter, Talend
Six alternatives
Fivetran, Matillion, Microsoft SQL Server Integration Services, Oracle Data Integrator, Stitch, TalendThree alternatives
Airbyte, Snowflake, dbtFive alternatives
IBM DataStage, Informatica PowerCenter, Matillion, SAP Data Services, TalendOne alternative
EtlworksMiniMax M2.5FivetranFivetranHeldInformatica PowerCenterIntegrate.ioagainst: Fivetran, Hevo Data, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Matillion, Talendno first choiceagainst: Apache Airbyte, Fivetran, IBM DataStage, Meltano
Four alternatives
Azure Data Factory, Cleo Integration Cloud, Databricks Lakeflow, StitchSix alternatives
Airbyte, Databricks Lakeflow, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Snowflake, Talend, dbtFive alternatives
Databricks Lakeflow, Fivetran, Matillion, Microsoft Azure Data Factory, TalendGPT-6 LunaFivetranFivetranHeldno first choiceFivetranno first choiceagainst: Informatica PowerCenter, Microsoft SQL Server Integration Services, Talend
Two alternatives
Informatica Cloud Data Integration, dbtTwo alternatives
Airbyte, dbt PlatformNine alternatives
AWS Glue, Fivetran, Google Cloud Data Fusion, IBM DataStage, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Matillion, Microsoft Fabric Data Factory / Azure Data Factory, Oracle Data Integrator, TalendOne alternative
Airbyte Pro or Enterprise FlexMuse Glimmer 30BInformatica PowerCenter, TalendFivetranChangedno first choiceagainst: FivetranIntegrate.ioagainst: Fivetranno first choiceagainst: Airbyte, Azure Data Factory, Fivetran, Informatica PowerCenter, Talend
Five alternatives
Azure Data Factory, Cleo Integration Cloud, Fivetran, Integrate.io, MatillionFive alternatives
Airbyte, Databricks with Delta Live Tables, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Snowflake, dbtSix alternatives
AWS Glue, Apache NiFi, Hevo Data, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft Azure Data Factory, TalendOne alternative
Hevo DataBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:38 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:45 | yes | 4 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:28 | yes | 11 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:12 | yes | 17 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:01 | yes | 24 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:53 | yes | 11 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:55 | yes | 24 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:30 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:43 | no | 0 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:56 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:43 | yes | 14 | 48 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:00 | yes | 9 | 34 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:45 | yes | 2 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:07 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:15 | yes | 20 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:55 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:53 | yes | 8 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:43 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:41 | yes | 24 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:29 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:03 | yes | 25 | 62 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:30 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:43 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:29 | yes | 25 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:52 | yes | 25 | 83 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 13:45 | yes | 5 | 55 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:24 | yes | 6 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 13:44 | yes | 14 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:04 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:51 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:01 | yes | 21 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:03 | yes | 18 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:09 | yes | 23 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:10 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:38 | yes | 23 | 38 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:54 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:35 | no | 0 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:43 | yes | 20 | 28 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:04 | yes | 25 | 82 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:11 | yes | 15 | 25 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:27 | yes | 9 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:44 | yes | 15 | 36 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:04 | yes | 17 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:32 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:24 | yes | 14 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:49 | yes | 18 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:07 | yes | 22 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:03 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:09 | yes | 23 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 13:17 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:36 | yes | 23 | 193 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 07:27 | yes | 25 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:39 | yes | 23 | 135 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:16 | yes | 22 | 46 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:59 | yes | 2 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:09 | yes | 21 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:10 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 13:39 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:22 | yes | 12 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:12 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:13 | yes | 13 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:08 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:34 | yes | 23 | 50 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:18 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:42 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:02 | yes | 10 | 46 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:29 | yes | 23 | 88 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 13:05 | no | 0 | 60 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:34 | yes | 2 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 13:07 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:08 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:26 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:16 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:58 | yes | 19 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:05 | yes | 19 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:45 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:44 | yes | 24 | 41 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 13:01 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:42 | yes | 21 | 88 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:51 | yes | 25 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:57 | yes | 23 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 13:10 | yes | 10 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:33 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:45 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Databricks read as Databricks Lakeflow
Estuary read as Estuary Flow
Hevo read as Hevo Data
Informatica read as Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
Informatica (PowerCenter/IDMC) read as Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
Informatica PowerCenter / IDMC read as Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
Pentaho (Community Edition) read as Pentaho Data Integration
Unresolved, counted raw
Airbyte Pro or Enterprise Flex
Apache Airbyte
Boomi Data Integration
Cloud Data Integration (CDI)
Databricks with Delta Live Tables
IBM StreamSets
IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration
IDMC
Informatica Data Integration
Informatica Data Integration and Engineering
Metaphor
Microsoft Fabric Data Factory / Azure Data Factory
Old-School Informatica (PowerCenter)
StreamSets
Xplenty
dbt Platform
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.