| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETL and ELT | Data platform | 2% | 6 of 75 | 3% | 35 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Data quality and observability | Data platform | 0% | 28 of 110 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Metaplane at 31% | |
| Data catalogs and governance | Data platform | 0% | 37 of 83 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Atlan at 44% | |
| Master data management | Data platform | 0% | 63 of 92 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Profisee MDM at 41% | |
| Telemetry pipelines | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 76 of 124 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by OpenTelemetry Collector at 37% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETL | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 6 of 75 |
| Data observability | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 28 of 110, unchanged |
| Data catalogs | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 37 of 83, unchanged |
| Master data | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 63 of 92, unchanged |
| Telemetry pipelines | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 76 of 124, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 10 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 7 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“use modern ELT orchestrators like dbt (Data Build Tool) coupled with lightweight extractors” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ETL · negative prompt · first choice
“ELT / transformations: dbt” GPT-5.4 mini · ETL · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Better Alternative: For most teams, a SQL-based transformation tool like dbt or a visual low-code tool is faster and cheaper to maintain.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ETL · negative prompt · alternative
“building tests directly into your ELT pipeline using dbt is cost-effective and highly customizable” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Data observability · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“dbt is usually a complement, not a full ETL replacement” GPT-6 Luna · ETL · comparative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 85 of the 100 answers that named dbt and are not a share of its labels.
289 of the 289 domain citations in answers naming dbt came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conference or event | 555 | 0 | 2026-06-07 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 176 | undated | |||
| Blog | 165 | undated | Observability | ||
| Report or ebook | 83 | 35 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Case study | 61 | 0 | 2025-04-17 | ||
| Comparison | 22 | 1 | 2026-08-27 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 10 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 3 | 1 | 2026-09-04 | ||
| Podcast or video | 3 | 0 | 2022-02-25 | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
As the event pages on getdbt.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page getdbt.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What dbt's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: getdbt.com, getdbt.com/pricing, trust.getdbt.com, getdbt.com/product/ai, getdbt.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when dbt's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as dbt, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for dbt by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: