AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Stitch · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Stitch

94Judge labels
7First choices
22Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
9% in ETL for small business buyers
Rank 4 of 75 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 20% of its 30 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Stitch →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In etl · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Stitch for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
ETL and ELTData platform4%4 of 7520%30accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Stitch held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · ETL · by segment

Small business▼−5Since September 2026: 13% → 8%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
8%from 13% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 3 → 5 of 61
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 5 → 4 of 69
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 18 → 64 of 64

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
ETL4%4%=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 5 → 4 of 75

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Stitch across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501214
GPT-5.4 mini01102
Gemini 3.5 Flash01124
Perplexity Sonar10001
Grok 4.2000516
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00123
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K201203
GLM 4.7 FlashX10102
MiniMax M2.501102
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01102

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct19 labels2
Paraphrase13 labels1
Comparative21 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained14 labels3
Scale-constrained10 labels1
Negative17 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative94 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“or Stitch if you need the lowest entry price for simpler ingestion needs” Perplexity Sonar · ETL · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with Hevo Data or Stitch Data for mid-market B2B companies” GLM 4.7 FlashX · ETL · direct prompt · first choice
“Stitch is a solid choice for businesses that need a simple, reliable data pipeline solution without complexity” Claude Haiku 4.5 · ETL · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Stitch is a lightweight, cloud-native ELT tool. It has simple row-based pricing, making it incredibly cheap” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ETL · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Stitch has limited customer support with community forums as the primary troubleshooting resource, pricing that doesn't scale well at large data volumes” Claude Haiku 4.5 · ETL · negative prompt · soft negative
“provides straightforward data replication but lacks Fivetran's deeper customization and robust enterprise security features” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ETL · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Only ~130 connectors, less reliable at scale... Better for small startups than mid-market.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ETL · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“you must be extremely cautious of their Monthly Active Rows (MAR) pricing model” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ETL · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Stitch, over the 94 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Stitch was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Matillion33 of 941Not among the top eight
Skyvia28 of 947Not among the top eight
AWS Glue26 of 940Not among the top eight
Apache Airflow22 of 940Not among the top eight
Azure Data Factory22 of 940Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Stitch. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 86 of the 94 answers that named Stitch and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

hevodata.com63
integrate.io55
fivetran.com49
airbyte.com46
estuary.dev39
blog.coupler.io35
skyvia.com28
sqream.com26
g2.com25
sarasanalytics.com22

388 of the 388 domain citations in answers naming Stitch came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

stitchdata.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Stitch takes 4% of first choices and Fivetran takes 40%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “etl tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “etl tools”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
823,000 a month (“stitch”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
214,976 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 8,859 a month
Searches its site ranks for
4,399 · 69 in the top three
Sites linking to it
2,725
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
4%
rank 4 of 75 in ETL
Segment leader
40%
Fivetran
First choices
7 across its categories
Named in
94 answers
Its own site cited
in 86 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on stitchdata.com
35,145
subdomains included
Content
585
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
10 · 34,388
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Report or ebook417undated
Blog77undatedETL
Glossary or explainer39undatedETL
Case study37undatedETL
Comparison15undatedData warehouses
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page stitchdata.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Stitch

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Stitch; a claim can dispute any of them.
Stitch Data 3Stitch (Talend) 1Stitch (by DataRobot) 1Stitch (by Qlik) 1Stitch (by Talend) 1Stitch (by Talend/Qlik) 1Stitch (now Qlik Talend Cloud) 1Stitch (now part of Talend) 1

Follow Stitch

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Stitch is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Simple, extensible cloud ETL built for data teams
For
data teams
Price stated
Starts at $100; Monthly at $1,500; Monthly at $3,000 stitchdata.com/pricing
Starting price
100 stitchdata.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
Try it free; No credit card needed stitchdata.com
Integrations claimed
130 stitchdata.com
Certifications
SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001Cyber EssentialsCyber Essentials PlusFedRAMP ModerateGovRAMPHITRUSTIRAP
Not stated on the pages read
Hosting, customers

What Stitch's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: stitchdata.com, stitchdata.com/pricing, stitchdata.com/platform/security, stitchdata.com/solutions/sales, stitchdata.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Stitch's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Stitch, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Stitch by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Stitch is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Stitch, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at stitchdata.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.