| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identity verification | Identity and access | 17% | 2 of 61 | 9% | 44 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I would particularly highlight Veriff or Jumio as top recommendations due to their balanced approach to security, user experience, and compliance.” MiniMax M2.5 · Identity verification · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the best identity verification service for a company with a strictly limited budget is typically Veriff” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Identity verification · budget prompt · first choice
“Veriff Essential is the cheapest credible option at $1.44 per user including sanctions screening” Muse Glimmer 30B · Identity verification · budget prompt · first choice
“For the tightest budget, I'd recommend starting with iDenfy or Veriff Essential” MiniMax M2.5 · Identity verification · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Veriff and Persona – due to consistently poor user ratings, frequent verification failures, and unhelpful support.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Identity verification · negative prompt · hard negative
“Late 2025 breach leaked plaintext government IDs, DOBs, and addresses. Faces class-action lawsuits” Grok 4.20 · Identity verification · negative prompt · hard negative
“Exposed data for thousands of customers” MiniMax M2.5 · Identity verification · negative prompt · hard negative
“Rigid verification flows with no fallback options” Kimi K2 · Identity verification · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 125 of the 133 answers that named Veriff and are not a share of its labels.
393 of the 445 domain citations in answers naming Veriff came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 302 | 0 | 2026-04-23 | CIAM | |
| News or press | 128 | 0 | 2026-03-06 | SOAR | |
| Glossary or explainer | 101 | 0 | 2026-05-28 | ||
| Report or ebook | 96 | 0 | 2026-06-11 | ||
| Case study | 91 | 0 | 2026-04-23 | ||
| Podcast or video | 50 | 0 | 2026-06-26 | ||
| Conference or event | 49 | 2 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 29 | 0 | 2026-06-24 | ||
| Comparison | 14 | 0 | 2025-10-17 | ||
| Template or tool | 6 | 0 | 2025-11-26 |
Every page veriff.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Veriff's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: veriff.com, veriff.com/pricing, trust.veriff.com, veriff.com/use-cases/kye, veriff.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Veriff's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Veriff, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Veriff by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Veriff is among the products AI models recommend first in Identity verification this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.