Three of fourteen models named Veriff first on the direct prompt; zero named Jumio. Veriff was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Jumio by fourteen and Veriff carries 44 labels and Jumio 36, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the identity verification page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Veriff and Jumio were named in the same answer seventy-nine times, of the 133 answers naming Veriff and the 103 naming Jumio. In those answers Jumio took the first choice twelve times and Veriff thirteen.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Veriff and Persona – due to consistently poor user ratings, frequent verification failures, and unhelpful support.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Late 2025 breach leaked plaintext government IDs, DOBs, and addresses. Faces class-action lawsuits” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
“Exposed data for thousands of customers” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“I would particularly highlight Veriff or Jumio as top recommendations due to their balanced approach to security, user experience, and compliance.” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the best identity verification service for a company with a strictly limited budget is typically Veriff” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Veriff Essential is the cheapest credible option at $1.44 per user including sanctions screening” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid for mid-sized: Onfido/Jumio (enterprise pricing, custom quotes often $1–2+/check with high mins)” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Jumio's median annual spend of around $55,000 is among the highest in the market, which is prohibitive for mid-market organizations” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · soft negative
“Excellent quality (5,000+ document types) but enterprise-focused with quote-only pricing and heavy minimums” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“One of the pioneers in the space, Jumio offers a "Digital Trust Suite." They have the broadest support for countries and currencies globally.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Jumio and Socure lead for regulated financial services... Jumio is the safest choice for global scale.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“One of the longest-established players, known for AI-driven, end-to-end identity verification.” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.