Three of fourteen models named Veriff first on the direct prompt; three named Sumsub. Veriff was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Sumsub by fourteen and Veriff carries 44 labels and Sumsub 40, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the identity verification page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Veriff and Sumsub were named in the same answer eighty-six times, of the 133 answers naming Veriff and the 119 naming Sumsub. In those answers Sumsub took the first choice sixteen times and Veriff nineteen.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Veriff and Persona – due to consistently poor user ratings, frequent verification failures, and unhelpful support.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Late 2025 breach leaked plaintext government IDs, DOBs, and addresses. Faces class-action lawsuits” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
“Exposed data for thousands of customers” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“I would particularly highlight Veriff or Jumio as top recommendations due to their balanced approach to security, user experience, and compliance.” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the best identity verification service for a company with a strictly limited budget is typically Veriff” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Veriff Essential is the cheapest credible option at $1.44 per user including sanctions screening” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Be most cautious about: IDScan.net, IDmerit, and Sumsub due to confirmed major data breaches.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“2024 breach through third-party vendor went undetected for 18 months” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“a July 2024 intrusion through a third-party support ticketing platform went undetected until a January 2026 review” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“I would recommend Sumsub if you want a balanced, enterprise-ready KYC document + selfie verification tool” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Sumsub — Best All-in-One Value ... Start with Sumsub if you need KYB (business verification) + KYC together” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The Best All-in-One Solution (KYC + KYB): Sumsub ... highly recommended for mid-market B2B companies” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.