AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Onfido · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Onfido

76Judge labels
6First choices
24Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
7% in Identity verification for enterprise buyers
Rank 16 of 61 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 31% of its 29 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Onfido →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In identity verification · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Onfido for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Identity verificationIdentity and access0%16 of 6131%29criticized challenger
Customer identity and access managementIdentity and access0%40 of 700%1under 10 labels · led by Frontegg at 21%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Onfido yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Onfido across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501102
GPT-5.4 mini02002
Gemini 3.5 Flash00101
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast00145
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash01124
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash02204
Kimi K202024
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.501012
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00303

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct10 labelsNone
Paraphrase14 labels3
Comparative22 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained11 labels2
Scale-constrained10 labels1
Negative9 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative76 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Onfido is famous for its user interface... "liveness detection" ... is considered among the best in the industry.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Identity verification · comparative prompt · alternative
“Developer-friendly platform acquired by Entrust in 2024; strong brand recognition in AI-powered verification.” MiniMax M2.5 · Identity verification · comparative prompt · alternative
“Onfido is also a strong contender for automated document and selfie verification” GPT-5.4 mini · Identity verification · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“For regulated industries needing maximum trust: Start with Onfido.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Identity verification · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid for mid-sized: Onfido/Jumio (enterprise pricing, custom quotes often $1–2+/check with high mins)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Identity verification · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Mid-2025 critical vulnerability exposed admin tokens, allowing plaintext biometric and ID downloads” Grok 4.1 Fast · Identity verification · negative prompt · hard negative
“Multiple customer complaints about rejected valid documents and technical glitches” MiniMax M2.5 · Identity verification · negative prompt · soft negative
“User complaints about repeated document rejections, technical glitches” Kimi K2 · Identity verification · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Onfido, over the 76 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Onfido was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Jumio58 of 767Not among the top eight
Veriff56 of 7613Not among the top eight
Persona50 of 767Not among the top eight
Sumsub47 of 7611Not among the top eight
Trulioo41 of 762Not among the top eight
iDenfy32 of 767Not among the top eight
Stripe Identity18 of 763Not among the top eight
Socure17 of 761Not among the top eight
Didit13 of 767Not among the top eight
AU10TIX10 of 760Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Onfido. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 65 of the 76 answers that named Onfido and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

onfido.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Onfido takes 0% of first choices and Persona takes 21%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “identity verification service”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “identity verification services”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
2,400 a month (“onfido”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
130 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 263 a month
Searches its site ranks for
24 · 9 in the top three
Sites linking to it
4,046
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 16 of 61 in identity verification
Segment leader
21%
Persona
First choices
6 across its categories
Named in
76 answers
Its own site cited
in 65 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on onfido.com
10
subdomains included
Content
2
counted in the table below
Documentation
4
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Report or ebook2undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page onfido.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Onfido

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Onfido; a claim can dispute any of them.
Onfido (Entrust) 3Onfido (Entrust IDV) 2Onfido (now Entrust IDV) 2Onfido (backed by Entrust) 1Onfido (by TransPerfect) 1Onfido (now Entrust) 1Onfido / Entrust Identity Verification 1

Follow Onfido

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Onfido is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Onboard customers in seconds with AI-powered biometrics and document intelligence that catches the fraud others miss and confirm that customers are who they say they are across every interaction.
For
customers
Certifications
KYCAMLeIDAS 2.0QES
Customers named
Revolut2nd AddressPrincipal Financial GroupUK Home OfficeGetAroundGoogleMicrosoft EntraOkta
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Onfido's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: onfido.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Onfido's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Onfido, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Onfido by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Onfido is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Onfido, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at onfido.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.