| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identity verification | Identity and access | 0% | 16 of 61 | 31% | 29 | criticized challenger | |
| Customer identity and access management | Identity and access | 0% | 40 of 70 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Frontegg at 21% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Onfido is famous for its user interface... "liveness detection" ... is considered among the best in the industry.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Identity verification · comparative prompt · alternative
“Developer-friendly platform acquired by Entrust in 2024; strong brand recognition in AI-powered verification.” MiniMax M2.5 · Identity verification · comparative prompt · alternative
“Onfido is also a strong contender for automated document and selfie verification” GPT-5.4 mini · Identity verification · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“For regulated industries needing maximum trust: Start with Onfido.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Identity verification · direct prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid for mid-sized: Onfido/Jumio (enterprise pricing, custom quotes often $1–2+/check with high mins)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Identity verification · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Mid-2025 critical vulnerability exposed admin tokens, allowing plaintext biometric and ID downloads” Grok 4.1 Fast · Identity verification · negative prompt · hard negative
“Multiple customer complaints about rejected valid documents and technical glitches” MiniMax M2.5 · Identity verification · negative prompt · soft negative
“User complaints about repeated document rejections, technical glitches” Kimi K2 · Identity verification · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 65 of the 76 answers that named Onfido and are not a share of its labels.
220 of the 220 domain citations in answers naming Onfido came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Report or ebook | 2 | undated |
Every page onfido.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Onfido's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: onfido.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Onfido's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Onfido, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Onfido by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: