AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › iDenfy · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

iDenfy

75Judge labels
20First choices
2Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
18% in Identity verification for small business buyers
Rank 5 of 61 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 26 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of iDenfy →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In identity verification · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named iDenfy for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Identity verificationIdentity and access8%5 of 610%26accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for iDenfy yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated iDenfy across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.511002
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash02002
Perplexity Sonar11204
Grok 4.1 Fast21104
Mistral Small01102
DeepSeek V4 Flash01102
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K202002
GLM 4.7 FlashX00202
MiniMax M2.510001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01102

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct14 labels3
Paraphrase9 labels5
Comparative16 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained28 labels11
Scale-constrained3 labels1
Negative5 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative75 labels in all, every segment counted; 20 of the 27 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd recommend iDenfy or Sumsub as top KYC document and selfie verification tools, with iDenfy edging out for its budget-friendly pricing” Grok 4.1 Fast · Identity verification · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the best practical choice is usually iDenfy because it is specifically described as well-suited for small businesses” Perplexity Sonar · Identity verification · budget prompt · first choice
“For the tightest budget, I'd recommend starting with iDenfy or Veriff Essential” MiniMax M2.5 · Identity verification · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose reputable alternatives (lower issues reported): Jumio, iDenfy, or ComplyCube” Grok 4.1 Fast · Identity verification · negative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as iDenfy, over the 75 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and iDenfy was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Onfido32 of 752Not among the top eight
Didit18 of 759Not among the top eight
Ondato12 of 750Not among the top eight
Entrust9 of 750Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named iDenfy. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 75 of the 75 answers that named iDenfy and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

idenfy.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, iDenfy takes 8% of first choices and Persona takes 21%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “identity verification service”
1
Position for “identity verification services”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
110,000 a month (“idenfy”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
18 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 6,549 a month
Searches its site ranks for
3,648 · 63 in the top three
Sites linking to it
5,065
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
15 ads · 12 text, 3 image · 3 shown in the last 30 days

First shown June 2025, as UAB "iDenfy", verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 9 in the year, 6 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
8%
rank 5 of 61 in identity verification
Segment leader
21%
Persona
First choices
20 across its categories
Named in
75 answers
Its own site cited
in 75 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on idenfy.com
900
subdomains included
Content
524
counted in the table below
Documentation
222
Product · Integration
27 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog299undatedIdentity verification
Report or ebook137undatedIdentity verification
Glossary or explainer41undatedIdentity verification
News or press31undatedIdentity verification
Comparison14undatedIdentity verification
Case study1undated
Conference or event1undated

Events in person

Last twelve months
  • September 29, 2026 to October 1, 2026SBC Summit 2026Feira Internacional de Lisboa & MEO Arena, Lisbon, PT · exhibited

As the event pages on idenfy.com state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page idenfy.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow iDenfy

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

iDenfy is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Identity verification service for user onboarding. Mitigate fraud with instant ID verification. Meet Know Your Customer, AML regulations.
For
businesses
Price stated
Pay only per successful ID verification idenfy.com
Starting price
1.35 idenfy.com
Free plan or trial
Try for free idenfy.com
Integrations claimed
8 idenfy.com · 5000 idenfy.com/integrations pages disagree
Certifications
ISO 27001 certificate number ISMS-1851/AISO/IEC 27001:2022SOC 2 Type IIeIDAS ComplianceGDPR compliantISO 27001
Hosting
EU
Customers named
PaysetCherry ServersHollaExGOAT FinanceBeera StationMano BankPonte FinanceCSGOWin

What iDenfy's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: idenfy.com, idenfy.com/security, idenfy.com/use-cases, idenfy.com/customers, idenfy.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when iDenfy's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as iDenfy, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for iDenfy by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where iDenfy is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name iDenfy, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at idenfy.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.