| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital risk protection | Security operations | 2% | 14 of 86 | 25% | 12 | criticized challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best overall for limited budgets: Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection” Perplexity Sonar · DRP · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose Proofpoint if your DRP needs are tightly tied to email security, identity protection, and insider/threat workflows” GPT-5.4 mini · DRP · direct prompt · alternative
“Proofpoint is known for identifying and mitigating threats tied to phishing and account takeover attacks” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DRP · comparative prompt · alternative
“One of the most established DRP solutions, offering dark web scanning, phishing domain detection” Mistral Small · DRP · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“more suitable than enterprise-heavy platforms like Proofpoint, ReliaQuest, or CrowdStrike” Perplexity Sonar · DRP · direct prompt · soft negative
“General Category Red Flags (Applies to Many, e.g., Proofpoint, CloudSEK)” Grok 4.1 Fast · DRP · negative prompt · soft negative
“avoid enterprise giants like CrowdStrike/Proofpoint unless scaling soon” Grok 4.1 Fast · DRP · direct prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 43 of the 47 answers that named Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection and are not a share of its labels.
211 of the 211 domain citations in answers naming Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: proofpoint.com/us/proofpoint-launches-nexgate-social-media-threat-center, proofpoint.com/us/linkedin-selects-proofpoints-nexgate-certified-compliance-partner, proofpoint.com/us/proofpoint-named-leader-digital-risk-monitoring-and-granted-groundbreaking-patent-social-media, proofpoint.com/us/proofpoint-essentials-adds-social-media-protection-email-attachment-defense-and-automated-email, proofpoint.com/us/proofpoint-extends-data-protection-and-information-governance-solutions-address-cloud-based-file. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: