| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital risk protection | Security operations | 0% | 22 of 86 | 13% | 15 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best overall for broad enterprise DRP coverage: Group-IB, an all-in-one platform with evidence-rich takedowns and 24x7 analysts.” Muse Glimmer 30B · DRP · comparative prompt · first choice
“Group-IB - Best Overall Enterprise Coverage” GLM 4.7 FlashX · DRP · comparative prompt · first choice
“Group-IB is also a good option because it explicitly covers phishing sites” Perplexity Sonar · DRP · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“For pure brand protection focus, consider ZeroFox or Group-IB.” MiniMax M2.5 · DRP · direct prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Group-IB Digital Risk Protection ... Limited Automation: Takedown processes often require manual follow-up” GLM 4.7 FlashX · DRP · negative prompt · soft negative
“typically six-figure per year and not published, so they are generally out of reach for limited-budget companies” Muse Glimmer 30B · DRP · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 51 of the 51 answers that named Group-IB Digital Risk Protection and are not a share of its labels.
253 of the 271 domain citations in answers naming Group-IB Digital Risk Protection came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
First shown August 2026, as Group-IB Europe B.V., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 1 in the year.
On Google's pages: 1
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Group-IB Digital Risk Protection's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: group-ib.com/products/digital-risk-protection, group-ib.com/resources/research-hub/apac-digital-risk-protection-cases-report-august-2025, group-ib.com/resources/podcasts/product/digital-risk-protection. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Group-IB Digital Risk Protection's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Group-IB Digital Risk Protection by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: