IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence

7Judge labels

2First choices

0Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence was named 4 times in Threat intel, where NordStellar led with 13%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business72 of 122

under the label threshold

Mid-market11 of 128

under the label threshold

Enterprise32 of 105

under the label threshold

In threat intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Threat intelligence platforms	Security operations	4%	11 of 128	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by NordStellar at 13%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	2	0	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labels1

Paraphrase2 labels1

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“SOCRadar offers the best balance of capability and affordability” Kimi K2 · Threat intel · direct prompt · first choice

“Start with SOCRadar for these reasons” Kimi K2 · Threat intel · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“SOCRadar is also a strong mid-market choice” GPT-5.4 mini · Threat intel · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Recorded Future7 of 72Not in the top three

CrowdStrike Falcon Adversary Intelligence2 of 71Not in the top three

Group-IB Threat Intelligence2 of 71Not in the top three

NordStellar2 of 71Not in the top three

Cyble Vision2 of 70Not in the top three

Flare2 of 70Not in the top three

ThreatConnect2 of 70Not in the top three

ZeroFox2 of 70Not in the top three

Feedly Threat Intelligence1 of 71Not in the top three

Abuse.ch1 of 70Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com5

b2breviews.com4

upguard.com4

analyticsinsight.net3

cyware.com3

g2.com3

capterra.com2

cyble.com2

esecurityplanet.com2

gartner.com2

Thirty of the thirty domain citations in answers naming SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-threat-intelligence-tools5

b2breviews.com/threat-intelligence-platforms4

upguard.com/blog/best-threat-intelligence-platforms-and-vendors4

cyware.com/blog/top-threat-intelligence-platforms-and-solutions3

analyticsinsight.net/cybersecurity/10-best-threat-intelligence-platforms-in-20262

analyticsinsight.net/cybersecurity/best-threat-intelligence-platforms2

cyble.com/knowledge-hub/top-best-threat-intelligence-platforms2

esecurityplanet.com/products/threat-intelligence-platforms2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence; a claim can dispute any of them.

SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence (XTI) 2

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at socradar.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.