IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › ZeroFox · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

ZeroFox

18Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ZeroFox was named 4 times in Threat intel and 1 other category, where NordStellar led with 13%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business25 of 122

under the label threshold

Mid-market28 of 128

under the label threshold

Enterprise22 of 105

under the label threshold

In threat intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ZeroFox for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Threat intelligence platforms	Security operations	0%	28 of 128	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by NordStellar at 13%
Attack surface management	Security operations	0%	90 of 104	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Intruder at 59%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ZeroFox yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ZeroFox across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	2	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“if your biggest pain is brand protection, executive impersonation, and takedown workflows” GPT-5.4 mini · Threat intel · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“focuses on external threat coverage and automated mitigation of brand impersonation” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Threat intel · comparative prompt · alternative

“shortlist SOCRadar or ZeroFox” GPT-5.4 mini · Threat intel · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ZeroFox, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ZeroFox was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Recorded Future17 of 189Not in the top three

ThreatConnect9 of 180Not in the top three

Flashpoint8 of 180Not in the top three

Anomali ThreatStream6 of 180Not in the top three

SOCRadar6 of 180Not in the top three

CrowdStrike Falcon Adversary Intelligence4 of 180Not in the top three

NordStellar3 of 182Not in the top three

Anomali3 of 180Not in the top three

CrowdStrike3 of 180Not in the top three

CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence3 of 180Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ZeroFox. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 18 answers that named ZeroFox and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com9

esecurityplanet.com7

g2.com7

upguard.com7

gartner.com6

analyticsinsight.net5

b2breviews.com5

anomali.com4

cyware.com4

devopsschool.com4

Fifty-eight of the fifty-eight domain citations in answers naming ZeroFox came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-threat-intelligence-tools9

esecurityplanet.com/products/threat-intelligence-platforms7

upguard.com/blog/best-threat-intelligence-platforms-and-vendors7

analyticsinsight.net/cybersecurity/best-threat-intelligence-platforms5

b2breviews.com/threat-intelligence-platforms5

gartner.com/en/documents/77983534

analyticsinsight.net/amp/story/cybersecurity/10-best-threat-intelligence-platforms-in-20263

analyticsinsight.net/cybersecurity/10-best-threat-intelligence-platforms-in-20263

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as ZeroFox

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ZeroFox; a claim can dispute any of them.

Zerofox 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ZeroFox's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ZeroFox, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zerofox.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.