1 category · RankedNetcraft
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital risk protection | Security operations | 0% | 21 of 86 | 12% | 16 | accepted challenger |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Netcraft across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Netcraft (G2 high performer, ranked #1 overall in some guides like WorldMetrics for preemptive domain disruption)” Grok 4.20 · DRP · comparative prompt · alternative
“reject them in favor of more modern, automated solutions like Recorded Future, Netcraft, or ThreatConnect” Qwen 3.7 Flash · DRP · negative prompt · alternative
“Ranked highly for its cost-effective solutions, especially for smaller teams needing transparent entry pricing” Mistral Small · DRP · budget prompt · alternative
“Uniquely proactive; great for companies with many customer-facing domains, though less common in mid-market” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DRP · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Netcraft specifically warns against the "dashboard trap," meaning a vendor may look good at reporting but not actually move abuse cases toward removal efficiently.” Perplexity Sonar · DRP · negative prompt · soft negative
“Best-in-class speed for removing fake sites/social accounts, but less transparent for low-budget entrants.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · DRP · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Netcraft, over the 53 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Netcraft was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 53 of the 53 answers that named Netcraft and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
252 of the 289 domain citations in answers naming Netcraft came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
netcraft.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Netcraft takes 0% of first choices and UpGuard BreachSight takes 22%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,400 a month (“netcraft”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 83 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 6,024 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,267 · 146 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 28,229
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 53 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 53 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 518 | 74 | 2026-09-29 | CDN | |
| News or press | 16 | 14 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Report or ebook | 9 | 8 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 8 | 7 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Comparison | 6 | 6 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 5 | 5 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Case study | 3 | 3 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Conference or event | 2 | 2 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 2 | 2026-09-29 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-29Netcraft vs zerofox comparison
- 2026-09-29Netcraft vs doppel comparison
- 2026-09-29Netcraft vs fortra phishlabs comparison
- 2026-09-29Thanks webinar webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-29Glossary glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-29Web server survey blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page netcraft.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Netcraft
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Netcraft is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Next-Gen Digital Risk Protection | AI-powered Cybercrime Defense by Netcraft
- For
- brand and digital risk leaders
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type 2
- Hosting
- AWS EMEA SARL (EU) Region
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, customers
What Netcraft's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: netcraft.com, trust.netcraft.com, netcraft.com/platform, netcraft.com/company/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Netcraft's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Netcraft, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Netcraft by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Netcraft is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Netcraft, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.