| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Email security | Security operations | 10% | 3 of 71 | 12% | 49 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd suggest starting with Microsoft Defender for Office 365 if you're on M365, or Proofpoint Core Email Protection if you need more advanced features” MiniMax M2.5 · Email security · direct prompt · first choice
“look toward platforms that specialize exclusively in email security ... such as Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Proofpoint, Mimecast, or Netskope.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Email security · negative prompt · first choice
“Proofpoint Essentials and Barracuda Email Protection are top recommendations due to their balance of advanced features, scalability, and value.” Mistral Small · Email security · direct prompt · first choice
“Proofpoint Email Protection - Enterprise leader with highest execution in Gartner; excels in regulated industries.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Email security · comparative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Proofpoint is priced and configured for enterprise environments with significant operational complexity... it just may not be suitable for smaller organizations.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Email security · negative prompt · soft negative
“Traditional SEGs (like legacy Proofpoint or Mimecast setups) require rerouting your MX records, which is complex to manage and can disrupt mail flow.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Email security · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“priced and configured for enterprise environments with significant operational complexity and generally positioned above SMB budgets” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Email security · direct prompt · soft negative
“More enterprise-oriented; may be overkill and over-budget for typical mid-market needs.” Kimi K2 · Email security · direct prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 131 of the 155 answers that named Proofpoint Email Protection and are not a share of its labels.
456 of the 504 domain citations in answers naming Proofpoint Email Protection came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Proofpoint Email Protection's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Proofpoint Email Protection, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at proofpoint.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.