AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Recorded Future · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Recorded Future

128Judge labels
10First choices
53Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
17% in DRP for enterprise buyers
Rank 7 of 86 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 34% of its 35 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Recorded Future →
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In drp · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Recorded Future for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Digital risk protectionSecurity operations4%7 of 8634%35criticized challenger
Attack surface managementSecurity operations0%75 of 1000%1under 10 labels · led by Intruder at 49%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Recorded Future yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Recorded Future across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500202
GPT-5.4 mini01012
Gemini 3.5 Flash01012
Perplexity Sonar00202
Grok 4.2011024
Mistral Small11002
DeepSeek V4 Flash11046
Llama 4 Maverick01203
Qwen 3.7 Flash03003
Kimi K201012
GLM 4.7 FlashX11013
MiniMax M2.501102
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00123

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct29 labels3
Paraphrase11 labels1
Comparative30 labels9not counted in share
Budget-constrained24 labels5
Scale-constrained10 labels1
Negative24 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative128 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 19 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Strong threat intelligence integration, excels at contextualizing exposed data, dark web chatter, and threat actor signals.” Mistral Small · DRP · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you want deep threat intelligence context (understanding who is attacking and why) → Recorded Future” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DRP · comparative prompt · first choice
“From leaders like Recorded Future (strong intel), ZeroFox (takedowns), Rapid7 (SOC integration).” Grok 4.20 · DRP · scale prompt · first choice
“I recommend Recorded Future as your primary solution” GLM 4.7 FlashX · DRP · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“What to avoid ... Recorded Future: Quote-based, but generally above $10,000/year.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DRP · budget prompt · hard negative
“Recorded Future is cited as an example of this trade-off: * Weaknesses: * Limited social media monitoring compared to platforms specializing in brand protection” Muse Glimmer 30B · DRP · negative prompt · soft negative
“Top-ranked for threat intel and DRP, but complaints include high costs, setup complexity, alert fatigue (less relevant noise), and limited automation” Grok 4.20 · DRP · negative prompt · soft negative
“far more accessible than enterprise-focused tools like ZeroFox or Recorded Future, which typically require custom six-figure quotes” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DRP · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Recorded Future, over the 128 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Recorded Future was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Netcraft38 of 1284Not among the top eight
Group-IB Digital Risk Protection35 of 1284Not among the top eight
CloudSEK XVigil19 of 1281Not among the top eight
Guardz17 of 12814Not among the top eight
CrowdStrike Falcon17 of 1284Not among the top eight
CTM36016 of 1280Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Recorded Future. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 125 of the 128 answers that named Recorded Future and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

recordedfuture.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Recorded Future takes 4% of first choices and UpGuard BreachSight takes 22%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “digital risk protection platform”
8
Position for “digital risk protection platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
6,600 a month (“recorded future”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
260 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 50,278 a month
Searches its site ranks for
5,343 · 432 in the top three
Sites linking to it
12,248
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
48 ads · 40 text, 4 image, 4 video · 22 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2024, as Recorded Future, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 12 in the year, 36 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
4%
rank 7 of 86 in DRP
Segment leader
22%
UpGuard BreachSight
First choices
10 across its categories
Named in
128 answers
Its own site cited
in 125 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on recordedfuture.com
1,810
subdomains included
Content
1,257
counted in the table below
Documentation
348
Product · Integration
28 · 14
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog738undatedSIEM, SOAR
Report or ebook362undatedTPRM
News or press65undated
Case study61undatedMDR
Glossary or explainer14undatedThreat intel
Conference or event7undated
Comparison6undated
Webinar or virtual event2undated
Template or tool1undated
Podcast or video1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page recordedfuture.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Recorded Future

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Recorded Future; a claim can dispute any of them.
Recorded Future (Digital Risk Protection) 1

Follow Recorded Future

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Recorded Future is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Advanced Cyber Threat Intelligence
For
organizations
Price stated
Pricing depends on the Package, organization-size tier, add-ons, services, and additional capacity selected. recordedfuture.com/pricing
Integrations claimed
100 recordedfuture.com
Customers named
SuperhumanNovavaxCitizens Financial Group
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, free plan or trial, certifications, hosting

What Recorded Future's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: recordedfuture.com, recordedfuture.com/pricing, recordedfuture.com/security, recordedfuture.com/platform, recordedfuture.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Recorded Future's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Recorded Future, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Recorded Future by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Recorded Future is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Recorded Future, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at recordedfuture.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.