Every category where a model named CloudSEK XVigil for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Digital risk protection	Security operations	0%	23 of 86	8%	12	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CloudSEK XVigil yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CloudSEK XVigil across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	0	2
Grok 4.20	1	1	1	3
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative10 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained6 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative27 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“CloudSEK XVigil is best for external digital risk protection because it monitors organization-specific exposure” Muse Glimmer 30B · DRP · comparative prompt · alternative

“CloudSEK XVigil | External risk monitoring, organization exposure | Broad DRP coverage” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DRP · scale prompt · alternative

“CloudSEK XVigil (PeerSpot top 5, strong in organization-specific monitoring)” Grok 4.20 · DRP · comparative prompt · alternative

“High-quality alert prioritization and low false-positive rates” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DRP · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“General Category Red Flags (Applies to Many, e.g., Proofpoint, CloudSEK)” Grok 4.20 · DRP · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CloudSEK XVigil, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CloudSEK XVigil was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

ZeroFox24 of 276Not among the top eight

Recorded Future19 of 273Not among the top eight

Group-IB Digital Risk Protection17 of 272Not among the top eight

Netcraft17 of 271Not among the top eight

Rapid7 Threat Command12 of 270Not among the top eight

Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection9 of 271Not among the top eight

SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence9 of 270Not among the top eight

Flare8 of 270Not among the top eight

Fortra Brand Protection7 of 270Not among the top eight

ReliaQuest6 of 270Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CloudSEK XVigil. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 27 answers that named CloudSEK XVigil and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

expertinsights.com24

guideflow.com23

cloudsek.comYour site22

upguard.com21

g2.com17

netcraft.com14

peerspot.com14

breachsense.com13

cyberpress.org12

cybersecuritynews.com11

149 of the 171 domain citations in answers naming CloudSEK XVigil came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

expertinsights.com/security-operations/top-digital-risk-protection-solutions24

guideflow.com/blog/digital-risk-protection-software23

cloudsek.com/knowledge-base/best-digital-risk-protection-platforms22

upguard.com/blog/best-digital-risk-protection-drp-software-platforms-and-solutions21

g2.com/categories/digital-risk-protection-drp-platforms14

netcraft.com/blog/best-digital-risk-protection-providers13

peerspot.com/categories/digital-risk-protection13

breachsense.com/blog/best-digital-risk-protection-platforms12

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

cloudsek.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, CloudSEK XVigil takes 0% of first choices and UpGuard BreachSight takes 22%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “digital risk protection platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “digital risk protection platforms”

Searches for its name, Google: 10 a month (“cloudsek xvigil”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 87,254 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 5,883 · 592 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 4,245
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 23 of 86 in DRP

Segment leader

22%

UpGuard BreachSight

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 27 answers
Its own site cited: in 27 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on cloudsek.com

4,826

subdomains included

Content

999

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

28 · 22

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	573	24	2026-09-22	Logs, Email security
Glossary or explainer	204	undated		Threat intel, EDR
Report or ebook	132	0	2026-02-10
Comparison	46	0	2026-05-27	ASM, SIEM
Conference or event	26	undated
Case study	6	1	2026-09-22
News or press	6	undated
Webinar or virtual event	4	undated
Podcast or video	2	undated

Most recent

2026-09-22Access for sale inside a russian speaking access brokers dual operation blog
2026-09-22Ai agent driven offensive operation crypto wallet credential compromise blog
2026-09-22Ai supply chain breach 2500 companies 434000 cicd pipelines blog
2026-09-22Aivigil mcp security case study case study
2026-09-22Aurora ransomware affiliate ai attack planning crypto payments blog
2026-09-22Bluekit phishing as a service phaas blog

Events in person

Last twelve months

September 16, 2026 to September 18, 2026GISEC Global 2026Dubai Exhibition Centre, Expo City Dubai, Dubai · exhibited
September 14, 2026TahawulTech Channel Leadership Forum & Awards 2026Dubai · attended
July 1, 2026EliteCISOs Enterprise Security Summit 2026The Westin, Gurgaon, Gurgaon, India · sponsored
July 1, 2026Elite CISOs Enterprise Security Summit 2026, Delhi/NCR EditionThe Westin, Gurgaon, India · sponsored

As the event pages on cloudsek.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page cloudsek.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as CloudSEK XVigil

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CloudSEK XVigil; a claim can dispute any of them.

CloudSEK 4CloudSEK (XVigil) 1CloudSEK XVigil (AWS Marketplace) 1

Follow CloudSEK XVigil

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

CloudSEK XVigil is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Digital Risk protection
cloudsek.com
For: enterprises
trust.cloudsek.com
Certifications: SOC 2ISO 27001 v2022GDPRISO 42001 v2023ISO 9001:2015 (Quality Management Systems)ISO 22301 v2019ISO 27017ISO 27002
Customers named: The Private Office of Sheikh Saeed bin Ahmed Al MaktoumMV Informática Nordeste Ltda
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What CloudSEK XVigil's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: cloudsek.com, trust.cloudsek.com, cloudsek.com/platform, cloudsek.com/customers, cloudsek.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CloudSEK XVigil's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CloudSEK XVigil, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CloudSEK XVigil by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where CloudSEK XVigil is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name CloudSEK XVigil, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.