AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › ReliaQuest · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

ReliaQuest

15Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ReliaQuest was named 3 times in DRP, where UpGuard BreachSight led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In drp · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ReliaQuest for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Digital risk protectionSecurity operations0%55 of 8633%3under 10 labels · led by UpGuard BreachSight at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ReliaQuest yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ReliaQuest across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00011
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best For: Organizations seeking a unified platform that combines DRP with broader security visibility.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · DRP · comparative prompt · alternative
“ReliaQuest is noted as a cost-effective DRP solution” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DRP · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“more suitable than enterprise-heavy platforms like Proofpoint, ReliaQuest, or CrowdStrike” Perplexity Sonar · DRP · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ReliaQuest, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ReliaQuest was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Recorded Future14 of 152Not among the top eight
ZeroFox11 of 153Not among the top eight
Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection10 of 151Not among the top eight
Netcraft8 of 152Not among the top eight
UpGuard BreachSight7 of 152Not among the top eight
Group-IB Digital Risk Protection7 of 151Not among the top eight
CloudSEK XVigil6 of 151Not among the top eight
SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence5 of 151Not among the top eight
CrowdStrike4 of 150Not among the top eight
CybelAngel4 of 150Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ReliaQuest. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named ReliaQuest and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cyberpress.org11
expertinsights.com11
guideflow.com10
upguard.com9
netcraft.com8
cloudsek.com7
cybelangel.com7
g2.com7
peerspot.com7
cybersecuritynews.com6

Eighty-three of the eighty-three domain citations in answers naming ReliaQuest came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

reliaquest.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ReliaQuest takes 0% of first choices and UpGuard BreachSight takes 22%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “digital risk protection platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “digital risk protection platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
12,100 a month (“reliaquest”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
567 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 10,314 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,821 · 87 in the top three
Sites linking to it
4,233
Paid Google search
5 searches its ads show for, about 2,356 clicks and $20,150 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
63 ads · 37 text, 14 video, 12 image · 24 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2023, as ReliaQuest LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 52 in the year, 11 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 55 of 86 in DRP
Segment leader
22%
UpGuard BreachSight
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
15 answers
Its own site cited
in 15 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on reliaquest.com
1,504
subdomains included
Content
1,208
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
12 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog62862026-09-23SIEM, MDR
Podcast or video34372026-09-23MFA, EDR
News or press8802025-07-29SOAR
Case study4502026-05-06
Glossary or explainer3422026-07-22ASM, XDR
Comparison3112026-07-22MDR, XDR
Webinar or virtual event28172026-10-27SIEM
Conference or event712026-07-15
Report or ebook2undated
Template or tool202026-02-24
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page reliaquest.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as ReliaQuest

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ReliaQuest; a claim can dispute any of them.
ReliaQuest (GreyMatter DRP) 1

Follow ReliaQuest

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

ReliaQuest is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The Agentic AI Security Operations Platform for Agentic Defense
For
security teams
Free plan or trial
Request A Demo reliaquest.com
Integrations claimed
300 reliaquest.com/integrations
Customers named
Southwest AirlinesJetBlueKKRLowe'sCintasAdientGraphic Packaging InternationalDonnelley Financial Solutions
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, certifications, hosting

What ReliaQuest's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: reliaquest.com, reliaquest.com/solutions, reliaquest.com/resources/customer-stories, reliaquest.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ReliaQuest's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ReliaQuest, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ReliaQuest by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where ReliaQuest is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name ReliaQuest, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at reliaquest.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.