IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Ivanti Neurons · September 2026 Edition

Ivanti · 2 categories · Named, not ranked

Ivanti Neurons

21Judge labels

0First choices

7Negative labels

9 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

8 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Ivanti Neurons was named 8 times in UEM and 1 other category, where Microsoft Intune led with 43%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business37 of 59

under the label threshold

Mid-market32 of 52

under the label threshold

Enterprise18 of 57

under the label threshold

In uem · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Ivanti Neurons for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Unified endpoint management	IT operations and endpoint	0%	32 of 52	40%	5	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Intune at 43%
Patch management	IT operations and endpoint	0%	23 of 87	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Action1 at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Ivanti Neurons yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Ivanti Neurons across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Strong for complex heterogeneous environments, predictive analytics, and legacy system support.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · UEM · comparative prompt · alternative

“Ivanti Neurons and Tanium stand out when patch decisions need to be tied to vulnerability.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Patching · comparative prompt · alternative

“Ivanti Neurons is a contender” GPT-5.4 mini · UEM · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“for mid-to-large enterprises needing AI-driven automation (may be heavier than needed)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · UEM · direct prompt · soft negative

“Gartner Leader; strong automation but pricier.” Grok 4.1 Fast · UEM · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Ivanti Neurons, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ivanti Neurons was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Intune16 of 218Not in the top three

NinjaOne13 of 210Not in the top three

Omnissa Workspace ONE11 of 211Not in the top three

Jamf11 of 210Not in the top three

ManageEngine Endpoint Central10 of 212Not in the top three

Tanium8 of 211Not in the top three

Action17 of 211Not in the top three

Automox7 of 210Not in the top three

IBM MaaS3607 of 210Not in the top three

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus5 of 210Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Ivanti Neurons. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 21 answers that named Ivanti Neurons and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gbhackers.com10

cyberpress.org9

cybersecuritynews.com9

syncrosecure.com9

action1.com6

blog.scalefusion.com6

expertinsights.com6

techvendorindex.com5

cdn-dynmedia-1.microsoft.com4

g2.com4

Sixty-eight of the sixty-eight domain citations in answers naming Ivanti Neurons came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cyberpress.org/uem-solutions-by-business-size7

gbhackers.com/best-uem-solutions-compared7

syncrosecure.com/blog/unified-endpoint-management-tools7

blog.scalefusion.com/best-uem-solutions6

cybersecuritynews.com/best-uem-solutions5

cdn-dynmedia-1.microsoft.com/is/content/microsoftcorp/microsoft/final/en-us/microsoft-bran4

cybersecuritynews.com/best-uem-solutions/amp4

expertinsights.com/it-management/the-top-unified-endpoint-management-uem-solutions4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ivanti Neurons's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ivanti Neurons, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ivanti.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.