Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 44 → 47 of 64
Ivanti · 3 categories · RankedIvanti Endpoint Manager
18Judge labels
0First choices
15Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Patching for mid-market buyers
Rank 85 of 85 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 80% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business51 of 69
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market85 of 85
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise95 of 96
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In patching · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Ivanti Endpoint Manager for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patch management | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 85 of 85 | 80% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus at 29% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Unified endpoint management | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 53 of 53 | 75% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Intune at 39% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Endpoint protection | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 66 of 86 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender for Endpoint at 22% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Ivanti Endpoint Manager held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Patching · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 55 → 79 of 79
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 20 → 93 of 94
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patching | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 55 → 85 of 85 |
| UEM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 43 → 53 of 53 |
| Endpoint protection | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 66 of 86, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Ivanti Endpoint Manager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Ivanti Endpoint Manager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative15 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best for: enterprises needing third-party application patching with on-prem/cloud control.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Patching · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“has been repeatedly hit by flaws in the patching workflow itself... Many teams are pausing new deployments until the patching channel issues are fully remediated.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Patching · negative prompt · hard negative
“High Caution/Avoid Unless Specific Fit ... HIGH CAUTION: Significant Security or Structural Risks... Why exercise extreme caution: Severe security track record” Muse Glimmer 30B · UEM · negative prompt · hard negative
“high-value attack target with a rough patch history. If you use it, patch it diligently and segment access.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Patching · negative prompt · hard negative
“should probably be avoided unless you have a compelling legacy reason and a robust patch management regime” Kimi K2 · UEM · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Ivanti Endpoint Manager, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ivanti Endpoint Manager was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Ivanti Endpoint Manager, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ivanti Endpoint Manager was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Ivanti Endpoint Manager. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 18 answers that named Ivanti Endpoint Manager and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
action1.com8
heimdalsecurity.com8
g2.com7
expertinsights.com6
manageengine.com6
syncrosecure.com6
windowsforum.com6
gbhackers.com5
its.ny.gov5
learn.g2.com5
Sixty-two of the sixty-two domain citations in answers naming Ivanti Endpoint Manager came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as Ivanti Endpoint Manager
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Ivanti Endpoint Manager; a claim can dispute any of them.
Ivanti Endpoint Manager (EPM) 2Ivanti Endpoint Manager / EPM 1Ivanti Endpoint Manager / Ivanti EPMM / Ivanti Neurons for MDM 1Ivanti Endpoint Manager / Neurons for Patch Management 1Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management / Ivanti Endpoint Manager 1Landesk 1
Follow Ivanti Endpoint Manager
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Ivanti is the company behind Ivanti Endpoint Manager.ShowHide
The company
Ivanti is the company behind Ivanti Endpoint Manager.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Instructor Led Training: Ivanti Endpoint Manager
- For
- administrators
- Certifications
- UEM certifications
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting, customers
What Ivanti Endpoint Manager's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: advantagelearning.ivanti.com/pages/endpoint-manager-live, advantagelearning.ivanti.com/pages/unified-endpoint-manager-1, advantagelearning.ivanti.com/courses/endpoint-manager-patch-vilt, advantagelearning.ivanti.com/courses/endpoint-manager-admin-event, advantagelearning.ivanti.com/bundles/unified-endpoint-management-1. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ivanti Endpoint Manager's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ivanti Endpoint Manager, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Ivanti Endpoint Manager by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Ivanti Endpoint Manager is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Ivanti Endpoint Manager, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.