| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unified endpoint management | IT operations and endpoint | 39% | 1 of 53 | 9% | 67 | endorsed leader | ▼−3Since September 2026: 43% → 40%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Patch management | IT operations and endpoint | 4% | 6 of 85 | 9% | 23 | accepted challenger | ▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Microsoft 365 management | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 22 of 149 | 8% | 12 | accepted challenger | |
| Remote monitoring and management | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 29 of 62 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by NinjaOne at 47% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Application shielding | Developer platform | 0% | 52 of 87 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Appdome at 33% | |
| IT asset management | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 35 of 82 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Freshservice at 31% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Network access control | Network and edge | 0% | 83 of 111 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Portnox Cloud at 35% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UEM | 43% | 40% | ▼−3Since September 2026: 43% → 40%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 of 53, unchanged |
| Patching | 2% | 5% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 6 of 85 |
| M365 management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 22 of 149, unchanged |
| RMM | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 29 of 62, unchanged |
| App shielding | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 52 of 87, unchanged |
| ITAM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 26 → 35 of 82 |
| NAC | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 83 of 111, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 4 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 11 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 12 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 3 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 11 |
| Kimi K2 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 9 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 9 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Intune is usually the default choice when you want cloud-first management tightly integrated with Microsoft's identity and security stack.” GPT-5.4 mini · UEM · comparative prompt · first choice
“included in Microsoft 365 E3 and E5 licences, which makes it the default "best value overall" for organizations already on Microsoft” Muse Glimmer 30B · UEM · comparative prompt · first choice
“If your company is already on Microsoft 365 → Go with Microsoft Intune. It's the most cost-effective and deeply integrated option” DeepSeek V4 Flash · UEM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you are strictly a "Microsoft Shop" (all Windows/Office), Intune is usually the most cost-effective and integrated path.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · UEM · comparative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Why cautious? Real-world exploit in March 2026 ... Users report steep learning curve, poor macOS/iOS support vs. Windows, and bloat if not fully Microsoft-stack.” Grok 4.20 · UEM · negative prompt · soft negative
“Microsoft Intune (With Caution) ... Intune can show a device as "compliant" even when critical third-party software ... is dangerously out of date” DeepSeek V4 Flash · M365 management · negative prompt · soft negative
“While incredible for Windows, patching macOS, Linux, or non-Microsoft software ... usually requires separate configuration or third-party add-ons” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Patching · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Microsoft Intune (Use with Caution) ... You should be cautious if you lack dedicated administration resources.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · UEM · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 329 of the 370 answers that named Microsoft Intune and are not a share of its labels.
802 of the 876 domain citations in answers naming Microsoft Intune came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Microsoft Intune's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: microsoft.com/de-de/surface/business/microsoft-device-management, microsoft.com/fi-fi/surface/business/microsoft-device-management, microsoft.com/es-es/surface/business/microsoft-device-management, microsoft.com/fr-fr/surface/business/microsoft-device-management, microsoft.com/hu-hu/surface/business/microsoft-device-management. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft Intune's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft Intune, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Microsoft Intune by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
AI models recommend Microsoft Intune first in Unified endpoint management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.