| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remote monitoring and management | IT operations and endpoint | 6% | 5 of 62 | 15% | 48 | accepted challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Patch management | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 45 of 85 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus at 29% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Remote support and remote access | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 46 of 77 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Splashtop Remote Support at 23% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMM | 0% | 4% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 29 → 5 of 62 |
| Patching | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 18 → 45 of 85 |
| Remote support | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 46 of 77, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Datto RMM and ManageEngine OpManager MSP are top choices due to their scalability, MSP-focused features, and strong automation capabilities.” Mistral Small · RMM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Datto RMM * Datto promotes G2 Summer 2025 recognition for its user versatility” Muse Glimmer 30B · RMM · direct prompt · first choice
“NinjaOne and Datto RMM are often cited as top choices” MiniMax M2.5 · RMM · direct prompt · first choice
“If your primary focus is BCDR and ransomware protection, Datto RMM’s built‑in detection and asset visibility are valuable.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · RMM · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“cited in community warnings and commonly treated with caution because of the broader Kaseya/Datto ecosystem risk profile” Llama 4 Maverick · RMM · negative prompt · hard negative
“While Datto RMM itself is technically regarded as a solid, modern, and highly capable product, the business practices of its parent company, Kaseya, are a primary source of complaint” Gemini 3.5 Flash · RMM · negative prompt · soft negative
“has been criticized and is often treated with caution ... sometimes avoided due to past security incidents and vendor lock-in issues” Mistral Small · RMM · negative prompt · soft negative
“Datto RMM has a complex interface that makes it difficult to navigate and use, and users find that support can be inconsistent” Claude Haiku 4.5 · RMM · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 123 of the 133 answers that named Datto RMM and are not a share of its labels.
489 of the 489 domain citations in answers naming Datto RMM came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Datto RMM's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: datto.com/datto-rmm-partner-request, datto.com/request/datto-rmm, datto.com/request/datto-rmm-trial, datto.com/resources/teleglobal-datto-rmm, datto.com/resources/datto-rmm-security-forum. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Datto RMM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Datto RMM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Datto RMM by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: