Every category where a model named N-able N-sight for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Remote monitoring and management	IT operations and endpoint	2%	10 of 57	27%	11	criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for N-able N-sight yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated N-able N-sight across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1	0	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	2	1	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labels2

Paraphrase5 labels1

Comparative10 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative7 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best default pick for mid-sized B2B MSP use: N-able N-sight RMM” GPT-5.4 mini · RMM · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“The Enterprise Choice: SolarWinds RMM ... Cons: The user interface feels dated” Qwen 3.7 Flash · RMM · direct prompt · alternative

“Good fit: Smaller teams that want an all-in-one starter platform.” GPT-5.4 mini · RMM · comparative prompt · alternative

“N-able N-sight is best for smaller MSPs and in-house teams.” MiniMax M2.5 · RMM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“N-able N-sight — appears in abuse reporting, and N-able products are often discussed in the context of network-heavy environments” Perplexity Sonar · RMM · negative prompt · soft negative

“8 vulnerabilities disclosed in 2025, all rated high or critical” Kimi K2 · RMM · negative prompt · soft negative

“(multiple vulnerabilities disclosed)” Mistral Small · RMM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as N-able N-sight, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and N-able N-sight was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

NinjaOne21 of 3113Not in the top three

Syncro20 of 314Not in the top three

Atera17 of 316Not in the top three

Datto RMM13 of 311Not in the top three

Action111 of 310Not in the top three

N-able N-central9 of 312Not in the top three

ConnectWise Automate9 of 311Not in the top three

ConnectWise RMM8 of 313Not in the top three

Kaseya VSA7 of 310Not in the top three

SuperOps7 of 310Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named N-able N-sight. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 28 of the 31 answers that named N-able N-sight and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

syncrosecure.com18

superops.com17

comparitech.com11

ninjaone.com11

aimultiple.com10

connectwise.com10

expertinsights.com10

learn.g2.com10

reddit.com9

blog.domotz.com8

114 of the 114 domain citations in answers naming N-able N-sight came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

syncrosecure.com/blog/best-rmm-software17

superops.com/best-rmm-software-and-tools14

comparitech.com/net-admin/rmm-software-and-tools11

learn.g2.com/best-rmm-software10

aimultiple.com/rmm-software9

expertinsights.com/it-management/the-top-rmm-solutions-for-msps7

gbhackers.com/best-rmm-platforms-for-msps-a-complete-comparison-guide7

acronis.com/en/tru/posts/the-remote-access-blind-spot-an-analysis-of-rmm-tool-risk-for-smb6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as N-able N-sight

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as N-able N-sight; a claim can dispute any of them.

N-able RMM 4N-Able N-Sight 1N-Able RMM 1N-able N-sight RMM 1SolarWinds RMM 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when N-able N-sight's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as N-able N-sight, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at n-able.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.