Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 6 → 15 of 38
N-able · 1 category · RankedN-able N-sight
29Judge labels
1First choices
8Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in RMM for small business buyers
Rank 8 of 62 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 25% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business13 of 40
0%12 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market8 of 62
2%8 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise12 of 45
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
In rmm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named N-able N-sight for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remote monitoring and management | IT operations and endpoint | 2% | 8 of 62 | 25% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by NinjaOne at 47% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, N-able N-sight held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · RMM · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 10 → 8 of 58
Enterprise▼−3Since September 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 3% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 7 → 12 of 42
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMM | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 8 of 62 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated N-able N-sight across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated N-able N-sight across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labelsNone
Paraphrase6 labels1
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative29 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd generally recommend N-able N-sight RMM as the best default choice” GPT-5.4 mini · RMM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“choose N-able N-sight if you want a more established RMM with a balance of price and capability” GPT-5.4 mini · RMM · budget prompt · alternative
“Best for mid-to-large MSPs who need deep network monitoring and multi-location client management” Claude Haiku 4.5 · RMM · direct prompt · alternative
“Best for: Smaller MSPs and in-house IT teams getting started” DeepSeek V4 Flash · RMM · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“SolarWinds carries an ongoing risk profile that many MSPs find unacceptable” DeepSeek V4 Flash · RMM · negative prompt · hard negative
“may fit smaller MSPs and IT teams better than larger mid-market needs” Perplexity Sonar · RMM · direct prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as N-able N-sight, over the 28 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and N-able N-sight was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as N-able N-sight, over the 28 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and N-able N-sight was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named N-able N-sight. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 28 answers that named N-able N-sight and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
syncrosecure.com12
connectwise.com11
learn.g2.com11
n-able.comYour site10
ninjaone.com10
superops.com10
g2.com9
atera.com8
acronis.com7
blog.domotz.com6
Eighty-four of the ninety-four domain citations in answers naming N-able N-sight came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
n-able.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, N-able N-sight takes 2% of first choices and NinjaOne takes 47%.ShowHide
Search and answers
n-able.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, N-able N-sight takes 2% of first choices and NinjaOne takes 47%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “rmm platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “rmm platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 40 a month (“n-able n-sight”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 5 a month
- Its company's site
- n-able.com shared with N-able's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 46,175 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 15,028 · 745 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 9,147
- Paid Google search
- 10 searches its ads show for, about 315 clicks and $16,177 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 8 of 62 in RMM
Segment leader
47%
NinjaOne
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 28 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 25 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as N-able N-sight
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as N-able N-sight; a claim can dispute any of them.
SolarWinds RMM 2N-able N-sight RMM 1N-able RMM 1N-able RMM / N-sight 1
Follow N-able N-sight
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
N-able is the company behind N-able N-sight.ShowHide
The company
N-able is the company behind N-able N-sight.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- N-able CTO Mike Adler offers a quarterly update reviewing improvements to the N-sight RMM platform as well as a preview of what’s coming in Q4.
- For
- MSPs and IT Teams
- Price stated
- See how much it will cost you per month and how we tailor our billing based off your business growth. n-able.com/resources/n-sight-product-tour-how-n%e2%80%91sights-pricing-is-based-on-business-growth
- Free plan or trial
- Start a free trial n-able.com/resources/n-able-n-sight-rmm-update-february-2024
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What N-able N-sight's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: n-able.com/resources/n-able-n-sight-q3-quarterly-roundup, n-able.com/resources/n-able-n-sight-rmm-update-february-2024, n-able.com/resources/n-sight-rmm-mac-device-management-for-it-pros, n-able.com/resources/all-partner-meeting-including-n-sight-security-roadmaps, n-able.com/resources/n-sight-product-tour-how-n%e2%80%91sights-pricing-is-based-on-business-growth. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when N-able N-sight's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as N-able N-sight, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for N-able N-sight by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where N-able N-sight is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name N-able N-sight, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.