| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patch management | IT operations and endpoint | 29% | 2 of 85 | 0% | 38 | accepted challenger | ▲+3Since September 2026: 27% → 30%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Remote monitoring and management | IT operations and endpoint | 8% | 3 of 62 | 10% | 10 | accepted challenger | ▼−4Since September 2026: 11% → 7%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Unified endpoint management | IT operations and endpoint | 7% | 3 of 53 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Intune at 39% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Vulnerability management platforms | Security operations | 4% | 10 of 77 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Rapid7 InsightVM at 30% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Microsoft 365 management | IT operations and endpoint | 2% | 14 of 149 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by CoreView at 20% | |
| Remote support and remote access | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 55 of 77 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Splashtop Remote Support at 23% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMM | 11% | 7% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 11% → 7%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 of 62, unchanged |
| Vuln management | 0% | 4% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 32 → 10 of 77 |
| UEM | 2% | 6% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 3 of 53 |
| Patching | 27% | 30% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 27% → 30%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 → 2 of 85 |
| M365 management | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 14 of 149, unchanged |
| Remote support | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 55 of 77, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 11 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Automox or Action1 | Extremely modern, cloud-native, excellent cross-platform support (Mac/Win/Linux), and very simple to deploy” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Patching · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose Action1 if you have under 200 devices and your primary needs are patching, software deployment, and remote access.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · RMM · budget prompt · first choice
“Action1 is the clear winner. Its free tier (200 endpoints, full functionality, no expiration) is unmatched in the industry” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Patching · budget prompt · first choice
“Action1 is widely regarded as the best budget-friendly choice because its free tier includes almost all premium features.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · UEM · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“we observed threat actors leveraging vulnerability management software such as Action1 to deploy ScreenConnect clients via Microsoft Installer packages” Muse Glimmer 30B · RMM · negative prompt · soft negative
“the available results do not frame it as clearly as the best fit specifically for mid-market B2B support teams” Perplexity Sonar · Remote support · direct prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 181 of the 184 answers that named Action1 and are not a share of its labels.
572 of the 660 domain citations in answers naming Action1 came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 393 | undated | Patching, RMM | ||
| News or press | 134 | undated | RMM, Patching | ||
| Case study | 50 | undated | Patching, RMM | ||
| Comparison | 30 | undated | Patching, RMM | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 10 | undated | Patching | ||
| Conference or event | 9 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 7 | undated | Patching | ||
| Report or ebook | 4 | undated | Patching | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
As the event pages on action1.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page action1.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Action1's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: action1.com, action1.com/pricing, action1.com/legal/security, action1.com/case-studies, action1.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Action1's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Action1, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Action1 by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Action1 is among the products AI models recommend first in Patch management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Action1 is among the products AI models recommend first in Remote monitoring and management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Action1 is among the products AI models recommend first in Unified endpoint management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.