| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Backup and disaster recovery | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 21 of 116 | 12% | 24 | accepted challenger | ▼−12Since September 2026: 12% → 0%, −12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Business continuity management | Security operations | 0% | 98 of 114 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by LogicManager at 24% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Backup and DR | 12% | 0% | ▼−12Since September 2026: 12% → 0%, −12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. | Moved past the floor | Rank 3 → 21 of 116 |
| Business continuity | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 98 of 114, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Channel-Focused DRaaS (Datto, Acronis): Highly popular for mid-sized companies working through Managed Service Providers” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Backup and DR · scale prompt · alternative
“Datto provides appliance + local virtualization for rapid failover, ideal for SMB/MSP with limited IT staff.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Backup and DR · comparative prompt · alternative
“Built for MSPs and mid/large B2B; all-in-one BCDR with cloud failover... Drawbacks: More MSP-oriented.” Grok 4.20 · Backup and DR · direct prompt · alternative
“Datto SIRIS is noted for unified backup and disaster recovery with instant virtualization” Perplexity Sonar · Backup and DR · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“product packaging and current positioning can change, so I'd want to verify the latest official details before making a strong recommendation” GPT-5.4 mini · Backup and DR · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Since Kaseya acquired Datto in 2022 and Unitrends in 2018, renewal and support issues have been reported for both.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Backup and DR · negative prompt · soft negative
“primarily focused on backup and disaster recovery rather than full business continuity management” Mistral Small · Business continuity · negative prompt · soft negative
“Primarily targeted at MSPs; may feel "over‑engineered" if you have a small fleet.” MiniMax M2.5 · Backup and DR · direct prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 54 of the 60 answers that named Datto SIRIS and are not a share of its labels.
174 of the 187 domain citations in answers naming Datto SIRIS came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Datto SIRIS's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: datto.com/products/siris, datto.com/resources/siris-explainer, datto.com/resources/fips_mode_datto_siris, datto.com/resources/cmit-wins-against-ransomware-with-datto-siris, datto.com/resources/total-communications-goes-beyond-bcdr-with-datto-siris. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Datto SIRIS's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Datto SIRIS, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Datto SIRIS by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: