Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 10 → 6 of 38
2 categories · RankedSuperOps
59Judge labels
2First choices
6Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in RMM for small business buyers
Rank 11 of 62 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 18 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of SuperOps →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business5 of 40
4%26 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market11 of 62
0%18 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise13 of 45
0%11 labels
criticized challenger
In rmm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SuperOps for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remote monitoring and management | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 11 of 62 | 0% | 18 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Remote support and remote access | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 50 of 77 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Splashtop Remote Support at 23% |
Movement
Since September 2026, SuperOps held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · RMM · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 8 → 11 of 58
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 → 13 of 42
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMM | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 11 of 62 |
| Remote support | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 50 of 77, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SuperOps across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SuperOps across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labels2
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative21 labelsNone
Budget-constrained8 labelsNone
Scale-constrained7 labelsNone
Negative9 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative59 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Atera/Syncro/SuperOps when per-technician pricing and an all-in-one PSA+RMM bundle are more important” Muse Glimmer 30B · RMM · comparative prompt · alternative
“Look for published pricing (NinjaOne, SuperOps, Syncro, and Atera all list prices).” DeepSeek V4 Flash · RMM · negative prompt · alternative
“Go with Atera or SuperOps if you want rapid deployment, predictable scaling costs” Qwen 3.7 Flash · RMM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Need integrated PSA/RMM with alert management and modern interface | SuperOps” GLM 4.7 FlashX · RMM · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SuperOps, over the 59 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SuperOps was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SuperOps, over the 59 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SuperOps was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SuperOps. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 55 of the 59 answers that named SuperOps and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
superops.comYour site37
syncrosecure.com37
atera.com34
geekflare.com25
learn.g2.com24
ninjaone.com22
blog.domotz.com21
softwaretestinghelp.com20
spotsaas.com20
connectwise.com19
222 of the 259 domain citations in answers naming SuperOps came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
superops.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, SuperOps takes 0% of first choices and NinjaOne takes 47%.ShowHide
Search and answers
superops.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, SuperOps takes 0% of first choices and NinjaOne takes 47%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “rmm platform”
8
Position for “rmm platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,000 a month (“superops”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 33 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 287,437 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 13,587 · 1,841 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,306
- Paid Google search
- 4 searches its ads show for, about 245 clicks and $18,469 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 11 of 62 in RMM
Segment leader
47%
NinjaOne
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 59 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 55 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on superops.com
1,696
subdomains included
Content
1,049
counted in the table below
Documentation
320
Product · Integration
5 · 49
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 441 | 6 | 2026-09-23 | RMM, Patching | |
| Conference or event | 357 | 0 | 2024-09-11 | UEM, RMM | |
| Glossary or explainer | 100 | 13 | 2026-09-24 | RMM, Patching | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 55 | undated | Patching | ||
| Comparison | 51 | 2 | 2026-09-24 | RMM, UEM | |
| Template or tool | 26 | 0 | 2022-06-08 | RMM | |
| Case study | 13 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 5 | 3 | 2026-09-12 | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24What is psa glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-24Onprem vs cloud comparison
- 2026-09-24What is rmm glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-24What is network level authentication glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-24Uem vs emm vs mdm comparison
- 2026-09-24What is it automation glossary or explainer
Events in person
Last twelve months
- April 13, 2026 to April 16, 2026MSP SummitLas Vegas · exhibited
- April 13, 2026 to April 16, 2026CP ExpoLas Vegas · exhibited
As the event pages on superops.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page superops.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as SuperOps
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SuperOps; a claim can dispute any of them.
SuperOps.ai 2
Follow SuperOps
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
SuperOps is its own company.ShowHide
The company
SuperOps is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- One AI-native platform to manage endpoints, automate service delivery, and scale IT operations — built for MSPs and internal IT teams.
- For
- MSPs and internal IT teams
- Price stated
- 14-day free trial, no credit card required. Paid plans available. superops.com
- Starting price
- 0 superops.com
- Free plan or trial
- 14-day free trial, no credit card required. superops.com
- Certifications
- SOC II Type 2GDPRISO 27001HIPAA compliance
- Customers named
- Appsolute ITLG TechJuggatechDayu TechAutoPay PlusXivTechSpark Education TrustPalmiq
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What SuperOps's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: superops.com, superops.com/security, superops.com/solutions/finance, superops.com/customers, superops.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SuperOps's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SuperOps, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SuperOps by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SuperOps is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SuperOps, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.