| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint detection and response | Security operations | 0% | 53 of 54 | 100% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Bitdefender GravityZone at 20% |
| Endpoint protection | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 67 of 99 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender for Cloud at 22% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“MSP reviews describe it as "among the least effective tools"... the high FPR and operational overhead can be a dealbreaker.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · EDR · negative prompt · hard negative
“Labeled "worst EDR" in MSP-focused Reddit rants... Best avoided unless you're locked into Kaseya ecosystem.” Grok 4.1 Fast · EDR · negative prompt · hard negative
“Datto EDR (Kaseya) — operationally painful for MSPs, buggy portal, poor support.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · EDR · negative prompt · hard negative
“Datto EDR: Documented performance impacts including sustained high CPU, elevated memory consumption, heavy disk I/O contention, and network slowdowns” Kimi K2 · EDR · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named Datto EDR and are not a share of its labels.
Fifty-six of the fifty-six domain citations in answers naming Datto EDR came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Datto EDR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Datto EDR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at datto.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.