Every category where a model named CrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
SIEM platforms	Security operations	0%	12 of 49	0%	8	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Sentinel at 41%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose CrowdStrike/Palo Alto if you want a converged platform with built-in XDR and flat pricing.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SIEM · comparative prompt · alternative

“Offers petabyte-scale ingestion and Charlotte AI assistant for natural language threat hunting” Llama 4 Maverick · SIEM · budget prompt · alternative

“Go with CrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM if you already use CrowdStrike on your endpoints” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SIEM · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for Existing Falcon Customers” Kimi K2 · SIEM · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Sentinel19 of 226Not in the top three

Splunk Enterprise Security16 of 223Not in the top three

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM15 of 223Not in the top three

Elastic Security15 of 222Not in the top three

Google Security Operations13 of 220Not in the top three

IBM QRadar11 of 220Not in the top three

Rapid7 InsightIDR10 of 222Not in the top three

Exabeam9 of 220Not in the top three

Securonix7 of 220Not in the top three

LogRhythm6 of 220Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 22 answers that named CrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

paloaltonetworks.com15

underdefense.com14

expertinsights.com10

gartner.com10

cipherssecurity.com8

rapid7.com8

exabeam.com6

solutionsreview.com5

cyberinfos.in4

decryptiondigest.com4

Eighty-four of the eighty-four domain citations in answers naming CrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/siem-tools-comparison15

underdefense.com/blog/siem-solutions-comparison14

expertinsights.com/security-operations/the-top-siem-solutions10

gartner.com/reviews/market/security-information-event-management8

rapid7.com/fundamentals/top-6-siem-providers-in-20268

cipherssecurity.com/best-siem-tools-in-2026-compared7

cyberinfos.in/top-10-best-siem-tools-20264

exabeam.com/explainers/siem-tools/siem-buyers-guide4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at crowdstrike.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.