Every category where a model named Rapid7 InsightIDR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
SIEM platforms	Security operations	22%	2 of 49	4%	28	accepted challenger
Extended detection and response	Security operations	0%	25 of 61	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender XDR at 63%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Rapid7 InsightIDR yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Rapid7 InsightIDR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	0	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	4	1	0	5
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	1	0	3
Mistral Small	1	1	0	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	0	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	0	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	0	0	0	2
Kimi K2	3	1	0	0	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	3	1	0	4
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct15 labels7

Paraphrase9 labels3

Comparative15 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained13 labels5

Scale-constrained5 labels1

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative59 labels in all, every segment counted; 16 of the 19 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Rapid7 InsightIDR tops many lists ... for mid-sized orgs due to asset pricing (no surprise bills as logs grow), included MDR ... and simplicity” Grok 4.1 Fast · SIEM · direct prompt · first choice

“Rapid7 InsightIDR is a good choice for organizations looking for a cloud-native SIEM solution with built-in UEBA and SOAR capabilities” Llama 4 Maverick · SIEM · direct prompt · first choice

“Highly recommended for mid-market teams seeking a user-friendly, cloud-native SIEM with built-in UEBA and SOAR capabilities” Mistral Small · SIEM · direct prompt · first choice

“is specifically designed for mid-market companies needing predictable costs and comprehensive coverage” MiniMax M2.5 · SIEM · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“good for SMBs but starts around $2.5K+/month” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SIEM · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Rapid7 InsightIDR, over the 59 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Rapid7 InsightIDR was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Sentinel49 of 5913Compare →

Elastic Security32 of 592Not in the top three

Splunk Enterprise Security25 of 593Not in the top three

IBM QRadar22 of 590Not in the top three

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM17 of 593Not in the top three

LogRhythm17 of 590Not in the top three

Blumira16 of 595Not in the top three

Wazuh15 of 595Compare →

ManageEngine Log36013 of 592Not in the top three

Sumo Logic13 of 590Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Rapid7 InsightIDR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 57 of the 59 answers that named Rapid7 InsightIDR and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

underdefense.com42

paloaltonetworks.com41

manageengine.com22

cipherssecurity.com21

expertinsights.com20

gartner.com20

exabeam.com19

subrosacyber.com19

xoomar.com14

reddit.com13

231 of the 231 domain citations in answers naming Rapid7 InsightIDR came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

underdefense.com/blog/siem-solutions-comparison39

paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/siem-tools-comparison37

expertinsights.com/security-operations/the-top-siem-solutions18

manageengine.com/log-management/top-siem-tools.html17

subrosacyber.com/blog/best-siem-reddit17

gartner.com/reviews/market/security-information-event-management15

cipherssecurity.com/best-siem-tools-in-2026-compared13

solutionsinsider.com/continuity-and-compliance-solutions/best-siem-tools-for-small-busines12

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Rapid7 InsightIDR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Rapid7 InsightIDR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at rapid7.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.