Every category where a model named Rapid7 InsightIDR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
SIEM platforms	Security operations	17%	3 of 61	6%	34	accepted challenger	▼−7Since September 2026: 22% → 16%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Deception technology	Security operations	2%	10 of 94	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Thinkst Canary at 37%
Network detection and response	Security operations	0%	28 of 102	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by ManageEngine NetFlow Analyzer at 21%
Extended detection and response	Security operations	0%	30 of 58	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender XDR at 40%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Rapid7 InsightIDR held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · SIEM · by segment

Small business▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

4%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 9 → 6 of 71

Mid-market▼−7Since September 2026: 22% → 16%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

16%from 22% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 4 pointsRank 2 → 3 of 55

Enterprise▼−8Since September 2026: 11% → 2%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

2%from 11% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 3 pointsRank 4 → 7 of 51

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
SIEM	22%	16%	▼−7Since September 2026: 22% → 16%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 2 → 3 of 61
Deception	0%	3%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 3% now.	New this edition	Rank 10 of 94, unchanged
NDR	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 28 of 102, unchanged
XDR	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 28 → 30 of 58

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Rapid7 InsightIDR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	2	2	0	5
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	2	0	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1	1	3
Grok 4.20	0	4	2	0	6
Mistral Small	0	2	0	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	2	1	0	5
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	3	0	0	4
Kimi K2	1	1	1	1	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	3	0	0	4
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	1	1	0	2
Muse Glimmer 30B	2	0	2	0	4

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct19 labels6

Paraphrase13 labels6

Comparative35 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained21 labels2

Scale-constrained14 labelsNone

Negative18 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative120 labels in all, every segment counted; 14 of the 17 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Rapid7 InsightIDR - Combines SIEM, UEBA, and SOAR capabilities in a single cloud-native platform with asset-based pricing that eliminates ingest anxiety” Claude Haiku 4.5 · SIEM · direct prompt · first choice

“"Best for: Mid-sized organizations that want a cloud-native SIEM with integrated MDR capabilities, fast deployment and strong endpoint visibility"” Muse Glimmer 30B · SIEM · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“The Best All-Rounder: Rapid7 InsightIDR ... widely considered the best fit for mid-sized organizations” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SIEM · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Need predictable pricing + managed detection without building a full SOC → Rapid7 InsightIDR.” Muse Glimmer 30B · SIEM · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid commercial SIEMs like Rapid7 InsightIDR ($2,500+/month)” Kimi K2 · SIEM · budget prompt · hard negative

“eliminates cloud-only platforms such as ... Rapid7 Incident Command” Perplexity Sonar · SIEM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Rapid7 InsightIDR, over the 120 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Rapid7 InsightIDR was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Sentinel64 of 12020Compare →

Splunk Enterprise Security48 of 1206Not among the top eight

Elastic Security44 of 1200Compare →

IBM QRadar32 of 1200Not among the top eight

Blumira28 of 12015Not among the top eight

Wazuh24 of 1201Compare →

Exabeam23 of 1200Not among the top eight

Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM23 of 1200Compare →

ManageEngine Log36022 of 1202Compare →

Google Security Operations21 of 1202Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Rapid7 InsightIDR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 115 of the 120 answers that named Rapid7 InsightIDR and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

paloaltonetworks.com50

underdefense.com45

expertinsights.com37

g2.com36

sentinelone.com32

comparitech.com26

exabeam.com26

kaseya.com25

q-sec.com25

manageengine.com24

326 of the 326 domain citations in answers naming Rapid7 InsightIDR came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/siem-tools-comparison45

underdefense.com/blog/siem-solutions-comparison30

q-sec.com/siem-knowledge-base/best-siem-for-small-business25

kaseya.com/blog/best-siem-tools24

expertinsights.com/security-operations/the-top-siem-solutions22

manageengine.com/log-management/top-siem-tools.html21

techrepublic.com/article/siem-tools20

panther.com/blog/best-siem-tools19

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Rapid7 InsightIDR stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 140 a month (“rapid7 insightidr”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 15 a month
Its own site: It sits on Rapid7's site (rapid7.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

17%

rank 3 of 61 in SIEM

Segment leader

38%

Microsoft Sentinel

First choices: 14 across its categories
Named in: 120 answers
Its own site cited: in 115 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Rapid7 InsightIDR

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Rapid7 InsightIDR; a claim can dispute any of them.

Rapid7 9Rapid7 (InsightDeception) 1Rapid7 Incident Command 1Rapid7 InsightIDR (with Deception capabilities) 1

Follow Rapid7 InsightIDR

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Rapid7 is the company behind Rapid7 InsightIDR.

ShowHide

On record

Company records

Also from Rapid7: Rapid7 ASM, Rapid7 AppSec Platform, Rapid7 Exposure Command, Rapid7 Incident Command, Rapid7 InsightAppSec, Rapid7 InsightCloudSec, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Rapid7 InsightIDR Deception and 8 more

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: your security center for incident detection and response, authentication monitoring, and endpoint visibility
docs.rapid7.com/insightidr
For: security teams
docs.rapid7.com/insightidr
Hosting: Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, customers

What Rapid7 InsightIDR's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: docs.rapid7.com/insightidr, docs.rapid7.com/insightidr/threats, docs.rapid7.com/insightidr/log-search, docs.rapid7.com/insightidr/idr-ai-usage, docs.rapid7.com/insightidr/duo-security. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Rapid7 InsightIDR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Rapid7 InsightIDR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Rapid7 InsightIDR by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Rapid7 InsightIDR is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Rapid7 InsightIDR, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Rapid7 InsightIDR is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.

ShowHide

Rapid7 InsightIDR is among the products AI models recommend first in SIEM platforms this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges

Show the code

<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/security/siem-platforms/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/rapid7-insightidr--siem-platforms-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in SIEM platforms, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the SIEM platforms standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides

Show the code

<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/security/siem-platforms/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/rapid7-insightidr--siem-platforms-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in SIEM platforms, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the SIEM platforms standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer

Show the code

<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/security/siem-platforms/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/rapid7-insightidr--siem-platforms-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in SIEM platforms, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the SIEM platforms standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.