Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 58 → 67 of 71
1 category · RankedSecuronix Unified Defense SIEM
47Judge labels
1First choices
14Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in SIEM for enterprise buyers
Rank 61 of 61 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 47% of its 15 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Securonix Unified Defense SIEM →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business74 of 79
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market61 of 61
0%15 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise6 of 61
2%30 labels
accepted challenger
In siem · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Securonix Unified Defense SIEM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIEM platforms | Security operations | 0% | 61 of 61 | 47% | 15 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · SIEM · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 43 → 55 of 55
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 9 → 6 of 51
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIEM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 43 → 61 of 61 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Securonix Unified Defense SIEM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Securonix Unified Defense SIEM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative15 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labels1
Scale-constrained8 labelsNone
Negative15 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative47 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Want cloud-native UEBA/long retention for mid-market to enterprise → Securonix Unified Defense SIEM.” Muse Glimmer 30B · SIEM · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Frequently called out as one of the worst in user forums... Delivery and reliability issues make it a "deal killer" for many.” Grok 4.20 · SIEM · negative prompt · hard negative
“calling it "absolute trash" and noting that "the sales pitch is slick but they fail to deliver anything worthwhile."d” MiniMax M2.5 · SIEM · negative prompt · hard negative
“Verdict: Highest caution — repeatedly flagged by practitioners... "Any other SIEM would outperform this one."” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SIEM · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid: Securonix unless you have dedicated resources to overcome its operational challenges” Kimi K2 · SIEM · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Securonix Unified Defense SIEM, over the 47 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Securonix Unified Defense SIEM was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Securonix Unified Defense SIEM, over the 47 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Securonix Unified Defense SIEM was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Securonix Unified Defense SIEM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 45 of the 47 answers that named Securonix Unified Defense SIEM and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
underdefense.com36
paloaltonetworks.com28
exabeam.com25
manageengine.com20
expertinsights.com16
panther.com15
netwitness.com13
kaseya.com12
reddit.com12
solutionsreview.com12
189 of the 189 domain citations in answers naming Securonix Unified Defense SIEM came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
securonix.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Sentinel takes 38%.ShowHide
Search and answers
securonix.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Sentinel takes 38%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “siem platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “siem platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 20 a month (“securonix unified defense siem”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 3,571 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,125 · 77 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,705
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 5 clicks and $13 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 61 of 61 in SIEM
Segment leader
38%
Microsoft Sentinel
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 47 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 45 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on securonix.com
2,302
subdomains included
Content
1,826
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
44 · 64
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 936 | 15 | 2026-09-23 | SIEM, SOAR | |
| News or press | 593 | 4 | 2026-09-22 | SIEM, SOAR | |
| Conference or event | 231 | 8 | 2026-10-14 | XDR, MDR | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 27 | 1 | 2026-08-28 | SIEM | |
| Comparison | 14 | 1 | 2026-07-10 | SIEM, XDR | |
| Glossary or explainer | 14 | 0 | 2024-10-30 | SIEM, SOAR | |
| Case study | 5 | 0 | 2024-12-16 | ||
| Report or ebook | 5 | undated | SIEM | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-10-14Sans ai cybersecurity summit conference or event
- 2026-09-23Securonix iso iec 42001 blog
- 2026-09-23Allan gray strengthens detection coverage and automates response with securonix blog
- 2026-09-23Iso 42001 ai governance pilot production blog
- 2026-09-23Securonix synq browser threat intelligence blog
- 2026-09-23Ai has entered the soc governance has to catch up blog
Events in person
Upcoming
- November 30, 2026 to December 4, 2026H-ISAC Orbit of Trust Fall Summit 2026Tucson · attends
Last twelve months
- October 26, 2026 to October 29, 2026FS-ISAC Americas Fall Summit 2026Austin, USA · attended
- September 18, 2026Securonix UnSummit Singapore 2026Pullman Singapore – Orchard, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore · hosted
- December 3, 2025 to December 5, 2025AISS 2025Hotel Pullman & Pride Plaza, Aerocity, New Delhi, India · hosted
As the event pages on securonix.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page securonix.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Securonix Unified Defense SIEM
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Securonix Unified Defense SIEM; a claim can dispute any of them.
Securonix 13
Follow Securonix Unified Defense SIEM
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Securonix Unified Defense SIEM is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Securonix Unified Defense SIEM is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Unified Defense SIEM, TDIR, UEBA & SOAR Solutions
- Price stated
- Priced For Outcomes, Not Overhead. securonix.com/products/siem-solutions
- Customers named
- Alberta Health Services
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Securonix Unified Defense SIEM's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: securonix.com/products, securonix.com/solutions, securonix.com/category/siem, securonix.com/solutions/cloud-siem, securonix.com/products/siem-solutions. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Securonix Unified Defense SIEM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Securonix Unified Defense SIEM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Securonix Unified Defense SIEM by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Securonix Unified Defense SIEM is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Securonix Unified Defense SIEM, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.