AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Security operations › Compliance automation › Drata vs Scrut Automation
Compliance automation · October 2026 Edition

Drata vs Scrut Automation

Nine of fourteen models named Drata first on the direct prompt; zero named Scrut Automation. Drata was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Scrut Automation by nine and Drata carries 63 labels and Scrut Automation 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Drata

endorsed leader

Named in seven categories this edition.

Scrut Automation

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share34%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate16%9%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#5A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels6311A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Drata reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Vanta was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Drata vs Vanta · Drata vs Sprinto · Drata vs Secureframe

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the compliance automation page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
DrataFirst choices, of fourteen modelsScrut Automation
Direct90
Paraphrase81
Comparative50
Budget-constrained006 against Drata
Scale-constrained30
Negative004 against Drata · 1 against Scrut Automation
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Drata and Scrut Automation stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Drata Scrut Automation first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Drata on the left and Scrut Automation on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Drata and Scrut Automation stood in it.

Drata first, Scrut Automation not the choice

9 of 14 modelsScrut Automation was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Drata alternatives: Hyperproof, Secureframe, Thoropass
Gemini 3.5 FlashDrata, Vanta alternatives: Secureframe, Sprinto, Thoropass
Perplexity SonarDrata, Vanta alternatives: Hyperproof, LogicGate Risk Cloud
Grok 4.1 FastDrata alternatives: Secureframe, Vanta
DeepSeek V4 FlashDrata alternatives: HiComply, Hyperproof, ISMS.online, Orbiq, Secureframe, Sprinto, Vanta
Kimi K2Drata alternatives: Secureframe, Vanta
GLM 4.7 FlashXDrata, Secureframe alternatives: Hyperproof, Orbiq, Vanta
MiniMax M2.5Drata, Vanta alternatives: Secureframe, Sprinto
GPT-6 LunaDrata alternatives: Hyperproof, Vanta

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniVanta alternatives: AuditBoard, Drata, Secureframe
Mistral SmallVanta alternatives: Drata, LogicGate Risk Cloud, Secureframe, Sprinto, Thoropass
Qwen 3.7 FlashVanta alternatives: Drata, Secureframe, Sprinto
Muse Glimmer 30BVanta alternatives: Drata, Hyperproof, Secureframe, Sprinto

Neither was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Drata leads by four points.
Drata8%#3 of 6
Scrut Automation4%#5 of 6
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Drata leads by thirty-two points.
Drata34%#1 of 9
Scrut Automation2%#5 of 9
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Drata leads by twenty-six points.
Drata26%#2 of 10
Scrut Automation0%#– of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Drata

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.

“What to Avoid If Budget Is Tight ... Drata (~$7.5K–$15K+/yr)” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Drata is the strongest all-around recommendation for mid-market scale, cross-framework automation, and proven audit workflow experience.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Go with Drata if you have a strong engineering team; go with Vanta if you have a standard SaaS-heavy stack and want speed.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Consider vendors like Vanta, Drata, Secureframe, or similar platforms that specialize in mid-market compliance automation” GLM 4.7 FlashX · scale prompt · first choice

What the models said about Scrut Automation

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.

“Scrut Automation: Minor gripes on bugs/sync issues (19/139 Capterra reviews), despite top ratings” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Vanta and Scrut are the most popular and highly rated options” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you're small and cost-sensitive, consider newer or mid-tier options like Scrut Automation (4.87/5 reviewer satisfaction, per Capterra)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · alternative
“Tops reviewer satisfaction (4.87/5 on Capterra); superior automated evidence collection.” Grok 4.1 Fast · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.