Compliance automation for enterprise buyers
Asked as “compliance automation platform”, and as “SOC 2 and ISO 27001 automation tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 57 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
37%
Contested · Drata 26%
37Vanta26Drata09Hyperproof28others
37% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026▼−9Since September 2026: 48% → 38%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Vanta held the lead, −9 points on 48%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Vanta35%Contested▲+1Since September 2026: 35% → 37%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-market
Drata34%Contested▼−2Since September 2026: 37% → 35%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseVanta37%Contested▼−9Since September 2026: 48% → 38%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This page
Vanta35%Contested▲+1Since September 2026: 35% → 37%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketDrata34%Contested▼−2Since September 2026: 37% → 35%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseVanta37%Contested▼−9Since September 2026: 48% → 38%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Vanta37%16%67endorsed leader▼−9Since September 2026: 48% → 38%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.48% → 38%
Vanta37%16%67endorsed leader▼−9Since September 2026: 48% → 38%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.48% → 38%02Drata26%20%59accepted challenger▲+10Since September 2026: 18% → 28%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.18% → 28%
Drata26%20%59accepted challenger▲+10Since September 2026: 18% → 28%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.18% → 28%03
Hyperproof9%14%37accepted challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 5% → 6%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 6%
Hyperproof9%14%37accepted challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 5% → 6%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 6%04
AuditBoard7%7%30accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 6%
AuditBoard7%7%30accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 6%05
OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance2%13%30accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance2%13%30accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%06
ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management2%13%30accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management2%13%30accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%07
Secureframe2%25%32criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
Secureframe2%25%32criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10
Archer0%45%11criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Archer0%45%11criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%09
Sprinto0%36%14criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Sprinto0%36%14criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%08
MetricStream0%31%13criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
MetricStream0%31%13criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Vanta37%
Vanta37%02Drata26%
Drata26%03Hyperproof9%
Hyperproof9%04AuditBoard7%
AuditBoard7%05OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance2%
OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance2%06ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management2%
ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management2%07Secureframe2%
Secureframe2%08MetricStream0%
MetricStream0%09Sprinto0%
Sprinto0%10Archer0%
Archer0%What they warned about
Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Drata20%
12 of 59 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“critiques for integration gaps, false positives in monitoring, and insufficient enterprise features” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
Vanta16%
11 of 67 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“the primary groups to scrutinize are **mid-market/SMB-native automation tools** (specifically **Vanta**, **Drata**, and **Secureframe**)” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Secureframe25%
8 of 32 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“primary groups to scrutinize are **mid-market/SMB-native automation tools** (specifically **Vanta**, **Drata**, and **Secureframe**)” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Sprinto36%
5 of 14 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“**Avoid for enterprise use.** These platforms are highly optimized for price-sensitive, lean, cloud-native startups.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
79 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1179 links across 281 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 9 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Vanta67 answers · 188 citations · 14 models
29 answers · 35 citations · 10 models
28 answers · 47 citations · 11 models
vendor site · ComplyJet24 answers · 36 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Optro21 answers · 25 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Sprinto18 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Guideflow16 answers · 16 citations · 10 models
15 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Drata14 answers · 20 citations · 6 models
13 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
vendor site · RiskWatch13 answers · 14 citations · 7 models
vendor site · FitGap13 answers · 14 citations · 10 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
39 answers · 12 models
26 answers · 10 models
24 answers · 11 models
22 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 10 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best compliance automation platform”, “compliance automation platform”, “compliance automation platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanta vanta.com | 37% | 500 | 40,500 | 1,219 | 72,260 | 120 | 1 | |
| Drata drata.com | 26% | 390 | 9,900 | 257 | 36,413 | 54 | 7 | |
| Hyperproof hyperproof.io | 9% | 142 | 1,600 | 37 | 64,238 | $59 | 34 | |
| AuditBoard auditboard.com | 7% | 99 | 8,100 | 220 | 129 | 0 | ||
| ZenGRC zengrc.com | 5% | 62 | 480 | 4 | 29,603 | 9 | ||
| OneTrust onetrust.com OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance 2% | 2% | 48 | 14,800 | 624 | 54,294 company | 58 | ||
| ServiceNow parent site ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management 2% | 2% | 190 | 135,000 | 13,451 | ||||
| Secureframe secureframe.com | 2% | 232 | 2,400 | 39 | 45,014 | 27 | ||
| Optro optro.ai | 2% | 47 | 2,900 | 39 | 126,117 | $4,599 | 75 | 5 |
| Mitratech Alyne mitratech.com | 2% | 10 | 10 | 0 | 46,305 | $10,768 | 106 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 23 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (drata.com, optro.ai, vanta.com). The first result for “best compliance automation platform” is vanta.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best compliance automation platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which SOC 2 and ISO 27001 automation tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade compliance automation platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best compliance automation platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a compliance automation platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which compliance automation platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5HyperproofDrata, VantaChangedVantaagainst: HyperproofComplyance, HiComplyagainst: OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, Vantano first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Drata, Orbiq, VantaOne alternative
OneTrust Compliance AutomationSeven alternatives
Cynomi, Drata, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, Orbiq, Scrut Automation, Secureframe, SprintoGPT-5.4 miniDrataDrata, VantaChangedDrata, VantaHyperproofno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
AuditBoard, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, Secureframe, VantaSix alternatives
AuditBoard, Hyperproof, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, Optro, Secureframe, SprintoOne alternative
AuditBoardGemini 3.5 FlashDrata, VantaOptroChangedDrata, VantaHyperproofagainst: Drata, VantaDrata, Vantaagainst: Delve, Drata, Scrut Automation, Scytale, Secureframe, Sprinto, Vanta
Four alternatives
Compyl, Hyperproof, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, Optro, formerly AuditBoardThree alternatives
Anecdotes, Drata, VantaThree alternatives
Anecdotes, AuditBoard, OneTrust Tech Risk & ComplianceThree alternatives
6clicks, SimpleRisk, WorkivaThree alternatives
AuditBoard, Hyperproof, LogicGatePerplexity SonarAuditBoard, VantaVantaChangedVantaMitratech Alyneagainst: Hyperproof, MetricStreamno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Hyperproof, Mitratech AlyneTwo alternatives
Hyperproof, ScytaleSix alternatives
Archer, Drata, Hyperproof, MetricStream, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, SprintoOne alternative
ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementGrok 4.1 FastDrata, VantaDrataChangedagainst: Scytale, Secureframe, SprintoDrata, Vantaagainst: Archer, MetricStream, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementZenGRCagainst: ComplyJet, Drata, Secureframe, VantaDrata, Vantaagainst: ComplyJet, Drata, Hyperproof, Vanta
Two alternatives
Diligent, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementThree alternatives
MetricStream, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, VantaThree alternatives
AuditBoard, Hyperproof, SecureframeTwo alternatives
Hyperproof, OneTrust Tech Risk & ComplianceThree alternatives
AuditBoard, Hyperproof, SecureframeMistral SmallVantaSecureframe, VantaChangedScytaleDrata, Vantano first choiceagainst: Drata, Hyperproof, Vanta
One alternative
SprintoTwo alternatives
AuditBoard, ScytaleFour alternatives
AuditBoard, MetricStream, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, VantaDeepSeek V4 FlashVantaVantaHeldagainst: OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, Secureframe, SprintoDrata, VantaOneTrust Tech Risk & Complianceagainst: Dratano first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Diligent, Drata, SecureframeOne alternative
DrataSeven alternatives
AuditBoard, Hyperproof, LogicGate, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, Optro, Secureframe, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementTwo alternatives
Secureframe, VantaLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceAuditBoardno first choiceagainst: ComplyJet, Drata, Hyperproof
Two alternatives
OneTrust GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementQwen 3.7 FlashDrata, VantaDrataChangedDrata, VantaDrataagainst: AuditBoardno first choiceagainst: Drata, Secureframe, Vanta
Two alternatives
MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementFour alternatives
AuditBoard, Diligent, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, VantaThree alternatives
AuditBoard, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, SecureframeOne alternative
VantaKimi K2Vantaagainst: DrataDrataChangedDrata, VantaZenGRCagainst: Archer, Drata, MetricStream, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, Secureframe, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, Vantano first choiceagainst: Archer, ComplianceQuest, IBM OpenPages, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Two alternatives
Archer, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementThree alternatives
AuditBoard, MetricStream, VantaFive alternatives
AuditBoard, Hyperproof, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, SAP GRCTwo alternatives
AuditBoard, HyperproofFive alternatives
Anecdotes, Drata, Hyperproof, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, VantaGLM 4.7 FlashXVantaServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementChangedno first choiceAuditBoardno first choiceagainst: Archer
Four alternatives
Drata, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, SureCloudFour alternatives
Drata, ISMS.online, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, OrbiqEight alternatives
Archer, AuditBoard, IBM OpenPages, LogicGate, MetricStream, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, SAP GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementOne alternative
OneTrust Tech Risk & ComplianceMiniMax M2.5no first choiceVantaChangedno first choiceZenGRCagainst: Archer, AuditBoard, ComplyJet, MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementVantanothing named
Two alternatives
Scytale, VantaTwo alternatives
Drata, OptroFour alternatives
Drata, MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, VantaTwo alternatives
Hyperproof, VissiblThree alternatives
Drata, Hyperproof, OneTrust Tech Risk & ComplianceGPT-6 LunaVantaDrataChangedno first choiceOpal GRCagainst: VantaDrata, Hyperproof, Vantaagainst: Delve, Drata, Secureframe, Sprinto, Vanta
Two alternatives
Drata, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementOne alternative
VantaSeven alternatives
Drata, Hyperproof, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, Optro, Secureframe, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, VantaThree alternatives
OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, Secureframe, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementMuse Glimmer 30BAuditBoard, VantaHyperproofChangedVantaErambano first choiceagainst: Drata, Secureframe, Sprinto, Vanta
One alternative
ComplyanceFive alternatives
Drata, OneTrust Certification Automation, Secureframe, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, VantaSeven alternatives
Archer, Drata, LogicGate Risk Cloud, OneTrust GRC, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, Secureframe, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementOne alternative
HiComplyBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:59 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:21 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 12:52 | yes | 21 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:34 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:44 | yes | 24 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:20 | yes | 18 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:14 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:58 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:29 | yes | 9 | 42 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:38 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:08 | yes | 14 | 90 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 13:00 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:58 | yes | 3 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:52 | yes | 14 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:52 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:42 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:22 | yes | 17 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:15 | yes | 19 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:26 | yes | 25 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:12 | yes | 7 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:51 | yes | 23 | 35 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:19 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:21 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:38 | yes | 22 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:44 | yes | 20 | 53 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:41 | yes | 10 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 13:16 | yes | 3 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 13:46 | yes | 20 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:42 | yes | 16 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:33 | yes | 9 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:26 | yes | 20 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:48 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:58 | yes | 23 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:13 | yes | 25 | 11 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 13:03 | yes | 24 | 67 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:51 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:05 | yes | 10 | 37 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:29 | yes | 18 | 29 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:20 | yes | 24 | 68 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:42 | yes | 18 | 30 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:24 | yes | 7 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:39 | yes | 15 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:54 | yes | 19 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:53 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:10 | yes | 16 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:08 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:08 | yes | 19 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:33 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:17 | yes | 25 | 46 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:58 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:04 | yes | 10 | 42 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:28 | yes | 23 | 36 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:53 | yes | 25 | 314 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:22 | yes | 20 | 75 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:44 | yes | 2 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:13 | yes | 22 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:24 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:17 | yes | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:12 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 13:11 | yes | 19 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:57 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:56 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:03 | yes | 10 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:26 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:30 | no | 0 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:29 | yes | 20 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:11 | yes | 24 | 159 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 13:48 | yes | 10 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:20 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:39 | yes | 15 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:36 | yes | 15 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:57 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:12 | yes | 29 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:44 | yes | 21 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:36 | yes | 22 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:44 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:54 | yes | 23 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:21 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:32 | yes | 10 | 52 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:23 | yes | 23 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:26 | yes | 25 | 44 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:42 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:26 | yes | 3 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 13:10 | yes | 23 | 24 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
OneTrust read as OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance
Scrut read as Scrut Automation
ServiceNow read as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Unresolved, counted raw
Cloak AI
OneTrust Compliance Automation
Paramify
SOCLYio
Tugboa
Vissibl
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.