Every category where a model named Thoropass for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Compliance automation	Security operations	0%	17 of 54	8%	13	accepted challenger
GRC platforms	Security operations	0%	63 of 77	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Vanta at 14%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Thoropass yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Thoropass across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	0	2
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative13 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained10 labelsNone

Negative12 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative46 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Thoropass is popular if you want a bundled model... though ensure your enterprise buyers are comfortable with their auditing arm” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Compliance automation · scale prompt · alternative

“positioning itself as a one-stop solution for mid-market organizations” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Compliance automation · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Offers bundled audit services but may still be costly and less flexible for smaller teams.” Mistral Small · Compliance automation · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Thoropass, over the 46 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Thoropass was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Drata46 of 469Not in the top three

Vanta45 of 4619Not in the top three

Sprinto36 of 465Not in the top three

Secureframe34 of 461Not in the top three

Hyperproof17 of 463Not in the top three

Scytale17 of 461Not in the top three

Scrut Automation14 of 461Not in the top three

AuditBoard12 of 461Not in the top three

ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management11 of 460Not in the top three

Archer9 of 460Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Thoropass. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 33 of the 46 answers that named Thoropass and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

optro.ai17

orbiqhq.com17

expertinsights.com16

netwrix.com15

vanta.com15

consilien.com14

sprinto.com12

securityboulevard.com10

guptadeepak.com9

cynomi.com8

133 of the 133 domain citations in answers naming Thoropass came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

optro.ai/blog/compliance-automation-tools16

consilien.com/news/best-compliance-automation-platforms-202614

expertinsights.com/compliance/the-top-compliance-automation-tools14

netwrix.com/en/resources/blog/compliance-automation-platforms14

orbiqhq.com/compliance-automation/compliance-automation-software14

cynomi.com/learn/compliance-automation-tools8

incorp.com/resources/knowledge-base/best-compliance-tools8

securityboulevard.com/2026/06/compliance-automation-platforms-compared-2026-vanta-vs-drata7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Thoropass's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Thoropass, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at thoropass.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.