Every category where a model named Scrut Automation for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Compliance automation	Security operations	4%	7 of 54	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Drata at 37%
Cloud security posture management	Cloud and infrastructure	0%	19 of 53	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Wiz at 43%
GRC platforms	Security operations	0%	44 of 77	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Vanta at 14%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Scrut Automation yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Scrut Automation across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	1	3
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labels1

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained11 labels3

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative9 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative37 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Scrut Automation offers the best long-term value if you anticipate needing multiple frameworks” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Compliance automation · budget prompt · first choice

“Scrut Automation: Best for Multi-Framework Budgets ... is highly cost-effective.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Compliance automation · budget prompt · first choice

“Choose Scrut Automation if your cloud security goals are specifically driven by the need to pass a compliance audit.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CSPM · budget prompt · alternative

“Scrut positioned for small and mid-sized businesses seeking compliance-focused CSPM” Perplexity Sonar · CSPM · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Scrut Automation, over the 37 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Scrut Automation was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Vanta30 of 376Not in the top three

Drata29 of 374Not in the top three

Sprinto24 of 375Not in the top three

Hyperproof21 of 372Not in the top three

Secureframe16 of 370Not in the top three

Scytale14 of 370Not in the top three

Thoropass14 of 370Not in the top three

AuditBoard8 of 370Not in the top three

ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management8 of 370Not in the top three

LogicGate Risk Cloud6 of 370Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Scrut Automation. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 37 answers that named Scrut Automation and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

expertinsights.com13

g2.com13

orbiqhq.com13

sprinto.com11

complyjet.com10

learn.g2.com10

reddit.com10

vanta.com10

brightdefense.com9

capterra.com9

108 of the 108 domain citations in answers naming Scrut Automation came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cynomi.com/learn/compliance-automation-tools9

brightdefense.com/resources/grc-tools-for-smbs-and-startups8

expertinsights.com/compliance/the-top-compliance-automation-tools8

orbiqhq.com/compliance-automation/best-grc-software8

complyjet.com/blog/best-grc-software7

consilien.com/news/best-compliance-automation-platforms-20267

optro.ai/blog/compliance-automation-tools7

vanta.com/resources/best-compliance-software-for-enterprise6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Scrut Automation's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Scrut Automation, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at scrut.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.