Index › IT operations and endpoint › Logs › Enterprise › September 2026 Edition

Log management for enterprise buyers

Asked as “log management platform”, and as “centralized logging tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 54 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.

Standing

Splunk

Clear leader

41% of first choices, clear leader.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

Small business

Better Stack34%ContestedStanding →Mid-market

Datadog Log Management20%ContestedStanding →Enterprise

Splunk41%Clear leaderThis page

01The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.

ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant

Splunk34%61criticized default

Datadog Log Management26%61criticized challenger

Elastic Stack26%47criticized challenger

Sumo Logic15%33accepted challenger

New Relic Logs14%22accepted challenger

Coralogix0%11accepted challenger

Grafana Loki0%30accepted challenger

Cribl0%13accepted challenger

Elastic Observability0%11accepted challenger

Dynatrace17%18accepted challenger

Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate

Graylog24%21accepted challenger

Microsoft Sentinel0%12accepted challenger

OpenObserve0%12accepted challenger

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its vendor page.

Head to head

Datadog Log Management vs Grafana Loki Datadog Log Management vs Graylog Grafana Loki vs Graylog

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default

Negative label rate →

Accepted challengerEndorsed leader

0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%

Key

Splunk41%

Datadog Log Management20%

Elastic Stack7%

Sumo Logic6%

New Relic Logs4%

Coralogix4%

Grafana Loki2%

Cribl2%

Elastic Observability2%

Dynatrace2%

OpenObserve0%

Microsoft Sentinel0%

Graylog0%

02What they warned about

Zero of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.

Splunk

34%

21 of 61 labels negative · 11 of 12 models · 4 hard negative

“Avoid these for predictability — **Splunk** — ... which makes it hard to forecast. ✗” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt

Datadog Log Management

26%

16 of 61 labels negative · 10 of 12 models · 4 hard negative

“Options to Avoid if Cost Predictability is Critical: Datadog's pricing model is complex and expensive at scale” Claude Haiku 4.5, budget prompt

Elastic Stack

26%

12 of 47 labels negative · 10 of 12 models · 3 hard negative

“**Why?** Operational nightmare at scale... Best avoided if: You're not running managed services like Elastic Cloud” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt

Graylog

24%

5 of 21 labels negative · 5 of 12 models · 2 hard negative

“Platforms to **Strongly Avoid or Approach with Extreme Caution**: 1. **Graylog (especially self-managed deployments)**” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt

03What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: twelve of the twelve in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

61 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 6 of those lists are Google grounding redirects that name no site and are left out of the counts. 826 links across 218 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.

openobserve.ai

vendor site · OpenObserve28 answers · 37 citations · 9 models

cribl.io

vendor site · Cribl28 answers · 36 citations · 10 models

signoz.io

vendor site · SigNoz24 answers · 27 citations · 10 models

middleware.io

vendor site · Middleware.io24 answers · 26 citations · 9 models

toolradar.com

23 answers · 29 citations · 9 models

cubeapm.com

vendor site · CubeAPM23 answers · 26 citations · 9 models

dash0.com

vendor site · Dash019 answers · 33 citations · 10 models

parseable.com

vendor site · Parseable19 answers · 24 citations · 8 models

exabeam.com

vendor site · Exabeam17 answers · 21 citations · 8 models

checkthat.ai

15 answers · 15 citations · 9 models

gartner.com

14 answers · 23 citations · 7 models

grepr.ai

14 answers · 14 citations · 9 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

cribl.io/resources/comparison-guides/top-10-log-collection-and-analysis-pla…

23 answers · 10 models

signoz.io/blog/best-log-management-tools

20 answers · 9 models

cubeapm.com/blog/top-log-management-tools

19 answers · 9 models

middleware.io/blog/log-monitoring-tools

18 answers · 8 models

openobserve.ai/blog/top-10-log-monitoring-tools-2025

18 answers · 8 models

toolradar.com/best/log-management/for/enterprises

18 answers · 9 models

exabeam.com/explainers/log-management/top-6-log-management-tools-and-how-to…

17 answers · 8 models

openobserve.ai/blog/log-management-tools

17 answers · 7 models

dash0.com/comparisons/best-log-management-tools

16 answers · 8 models

checkthat.ai/answers/what-are-the-best-log-management-tools

15 answers · 9 models

04How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.

ModelDirect“What is the best log management platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which centralized logging tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade log management platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best log management platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a log management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which log management platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”

Claude Haiku 4.5Datadog Log Management, Splunk

One alternative

Sumo Logic

Splunk, Sumo LogicChanged

Six alternatives

Cribl Stream, Datadog Log Management, Dynatrace, Elastic Stack, Grafana Loki, Graylog

no first choiceagainst: SplunkNew Relic Logs

One alternative

CubeAPM

against: Datadog Log Management, Splunkno first choiceagainst: Elastic Stack, OpenSearch, Splunk

GPT-5.4 miniDatadog Log Management

Four alternatives

Elastic Observability, Grafana Loki, New Relic Logs, Splunk

SplunkChanged

Two alternatives

Elastic Observability, Sumo Logic

Splunk

Six alternatives

Datadog Log Management, Elastic Observability, Elastic Stack, Grafana Loki, Microsoft Sentinel, Sumo Logic

Grafana Cloud Logs

Two alternatives

Datadog Log Management, Splunk

against: Elastic Stack, Graylogno first choicenothing named

Gemini 3.5 FlashDatadog Log Management, Splunk

Six alternatives

Coralogix, Cribl Stream, Dynatrace, Grafana Loki, Logz.io, OpenObserve

Datadog Log ManagementChanged

Three alternatives

Coralogix, Dynatrace, Grafana Loki

against: Elastic Stack, Splunkno first choice

Six alternatives

Datadog Log Management, Dynatrace, Elastic Stack (ELK) & OpenSearch, Grafana Loki, Splunk, Sumo Logic

Grafana Loki

Four alternatives

Coralogix, Cribl Stream, CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale, OpenObserve

against: Datadog Log Management, Splunk, Sumo LogicSplunk, Sumo Logic

Five alternatives

CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale, Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Grafana Loki, New Relic Logs

against: ArcSight, Better Stack, Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, IBM QRadar, LogRhythm, Loggly, OpenSearch, SolarWinds Papertrail, Splunk

Perplexity SonarElastic Observability

Five alternatives

Cribl, Datadog Log Management, Microsoft Sentinel, OpenObserve, Splunk

SplunkChanged

Three alternatives

Cribl, Datadog Log Management, Graylog

no first choiceCubeAPM

Two alternatives

Coralogix, Cribl

no first choiceagainst: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Graylog, Splunk

Grok 4.1 FastElastic Stack, Splunk

Two alternatives

Datadog Log Management, Sumo Logic

SplunkChanged

Three alternatives

Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Sumo Logic

no first choiceNew Relic Logs

One alternative

Grafana Loki

against: Datadog Log ManagementSplunk

Three alternatives

Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Sumo Logic

against: Dynatraceagainst: Datadog Log Management, Dynatrace, Elastic Stack, Graylog, Splunk

Mistral SmallDatadog Log Management, Splunk Observability Cloud

Three alternatives

Cribl, Elastic Observability, Grafana Loki

SplunkChanged

Two alternatives

Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack

Splunk

Five alternatives

Cribl, Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Graylog, Microsoft Sentinel

Coralogix, CubeAPM

One alternative

New Relic Logs

against: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Splunkno first choiceagainst: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Splunk

DeepSeek V4 FlashDatadog Log Management, Splunk

Five alternatives

Cribl, Dynatrace, Elastic Observability, New Relic Logs, OpenObserve

SplunkChanged

Four alternatives

Cribl, Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Sumo Logic

Datadog Log Management, Splunk

Seven alternatives

Elastic Observability, Grafana Loki, Graylog, New Relic Logs, OpenObserve, SigNoz, Sumo Logic

Dynatrace

One alternative

Exabeam

against: Datadog Log Management, Splunk, Sumo Logicno first choiceagainst: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Graylog, Loggly, OpenSearch, SolarWinds Papertrail, Splunk, Sumo Logic

Llama 4 MaverickCribl

Three alternatives

Datadog Log Management, Dynatrace, Elastic Observability

SplunkChanged

Two alternatives

Datadog Log Management, Dynatrace

no first choiceCubeAPM

Two alternatives

Grafana Cloud, SigNoz

against: Datadog Log Managementno first choiceagainst: Datadog Log Management, Dynatrace, Splunk

Qwen 3.7 FlashSplunk

Four alternatives

Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Grafana Loki, Microsoft Sentinel

Datadog Log Management, SplunkChanged

Two alternatives

Elastic Stack, Grafana Loki

Splunk

Three alternatives

Cribl, Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack

Sumo Logic

Two alternatives

Graylog, OpenSearch / Elasticsearch

against: Datadog Log Management, New Relic Logs, Splunkno first choice

Four alternatives

Cloud-Native, Datadog Log Management, Dynatrace, New Relic Logs

against: Elastic Stack, OpenSearch, Splunk, Sumo Logicagainst: Loggly, SolarWinds Papertrail

Kimi K2Splunk

Four alternatives

Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Logpoint, Sumo Logic

Datadog Log Management, Elastic StackChanged

One alternative

Cribl

against: SplunkSplunk

Four alternatives

Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Grafana Loki, Sumo Logic

Coralogixagainst: Datadog Log Management, Grafana Cloud, New Relic Logs, SplunkSplunk

Four alternatives

CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale, Datadog Log Management, Elastic Security, Microsoft Sentinel

against: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Splunk, Sumo Logic

GLM 4.7 FlashXDatadog Log Management, Splunk

Three alternatives

Elastic Stack, Grafana Cloud, New Relic Logs

SplunkChanged

Four alternatives

Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Grafana Loki, OpenObserve

Splunk

Seven alternatives

Amazon CloudWatch Logs, Azure Monitor, Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Google Cloud Logging, New Relic Logs, Sumo Logic

Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stackagainst: New Relic Logs, Splunkno first choiceagainst: Elastic Stack, Graylog, IBM QRadar, Splunk

MiniMax M2.5Elastic Stack, Splunk

One alternative

Grafana Loki

SplunkChanged

Six alternatives

Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Grafana Loki, Graylog, Microsoft Sentinel, Sumo Logic

against: IBM QRadarno first choiceManageEngine Log360

Four alternatives

Dash0, KloudMate, Netdata, Sumo Logic

against: Datadog Log Management, SplunkDatadog Log Management, Splunk

Two alternatives

Elastic Stack, Microsoft Sentinel

nothing named

Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

05The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record

Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.

Prompt	Model	Version string	Time (UTC)	Searched	Sources	Latency
Direct recommendation	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-17 11:37	no	0	5 s
Direct recommendation	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-17 11:41	yes	5	5 s
Direct recommendation	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-17 11:07	yes	9	29 s
Direct recommendation	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-17 12:50	yes	20	5 s
Direct recommendation	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-17 12:00	yes	38	17 s
Direct recommendation	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-17 10:38	yes	9	6 s
Direct recommendation	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks`	2026-09-17 09:43	yes	9	14 s
Direct recommendation	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-17 11:33	yes	5	3 s
Direct recommendation	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-17 10:30	no	0	38 s
Direct recommendation	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-17 11:18	yes	15	27 s
Direct recommendation	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-17 11:03	yes	15	62 s
Direct recommendation	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-17 13:55	yes	5	26 s
Paraphrase	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-17 12:20	yes	9	8 s
Paraphrase	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-17 11:01	yes	4	5 s
Paraphrase	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-17 11:52	yes	9	22 s
Paraphrase	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-17 13:26	yes	20	6 s
Paraphrase	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-17 10:56	yes	13	8 s
Paraphrase	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-17 13:13	no	0	3 s
Paraphrase	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks`	2026-09-17 12:19	yes	9	13 s
Paraphrase	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-17 10:48	yes	5	2 s
Paraphrase	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-17 14:02	yes	10	41 s
Paraphrase	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-17 11:39	yes	10	62 s
Paraphrase	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-17 12:32	yes	13	36 s
Paraphrase	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-17 09:26	no	0	68 s
Comparative	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-17 11:28	yes	9	9 s
Comparative	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-17 13:17	yes	7	10 s
Comparative	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-17 13:04	yes	20	34 s
Comparative	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-17 11:47	yes	20	8 s
Comparative	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-17 12:59	yes	27	15 s
Comparative	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-17 10:31	yes	5	7 s
Comparative	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks`	2026-09-17 13:59	yes	12	18 s
Comparative	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-17 09:22	yes	5	3 s
Comparative	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-17 10:14	yes	5	45 s
Comparative	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-17 09:45	yes	18	51 s
Comparative	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-17 13:30	no	0	158 s
Comparative	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-17 11:14	yes	9	47 s
Budget constrained	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-17 10:19	yes	9	7 s
Budget constrained	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-17 12:22	yes	4	7 s
Budget constrained	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-17 12:53	yes	23	32 s
Budget constrained	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-17 10:16	yes	20	5 s
Budget constrained	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-17 11:09	yes	39	21 s
Budget constrained	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-17 12:06	yes	5	5 s
Budget constrained	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks`	2026-09-17 10:24	yes	23	31 s
Budget constrained	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-17 11:15	yes	5	3 s
Budget constrained	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-17 10:47	yes	13	117 s
Budget constrained	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-17 10:46	yes	20	31 s
Budget constrained	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-17 12:16	yes	27	66 s
Budget constrained	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-17 09:27	yes	5	32 s
Scale constrained	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-17 10:15	no	0	6 s
Scale constrained	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-17 10:54	no	0	10 s
Scale constrained	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-17 11:58	yes	9	32 s
Scale constrained	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-17 13:02	yes	20	8 s
Scale constrained	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-17 12:11	yes	15	13 s
Scale constrained	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-17 10:47	no	0	8 s
Scale constrained	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks`	2026-09-17 13:13	yes	30	33 s
Scale constrained	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-17 13:16	yes	5	5 s
Scale constrained	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-17 13:54	no	0	43 s
Scale constrained	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-17 13:04	yes	15	26 s
Scale constrained	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-17 10:29	yes	23	58 s
Scale constrained	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-17 10:10	yes	10	29 s
Negative framing	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-17 11:31	yes	28	16 s
Negative framing	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-17 13:48	no	0	6 s
Negative framing	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-17 10:31	yes	14	25 s
Negative framing	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-17 13:48	yes	19	7 s
Negative framing	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-17 10:41	yes	22	17 s
Negative framing	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-17 13:05	yes	19	14 s
Negative framing	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks`	2026-09-17 12:59	yes	34	45 s
Negative framing	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-17 13:03	yes	5	3 s
Negative framing	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-17 10:45	yes	26	63 s
Negative framing	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-17 09:32	yes	29	37 s
Negative framing	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-17 13:39	yes	25	165 s
Negative framing	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-17 13:11	no	0	9 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

Category-scoped readings

AWS CloudWatch read as Amazon CloudWatch Logs

Datadog read as Datadog Log Management

ELK read as Elastic Stack

ELK Stack read as Elastic Stack

ELK Stack (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana) read as Elastic Stack

ELK Stack (Elasticsearch/Logstash/Kibana, self-hosted) read as Elastic Stack

Elastic read as Elastic Stack

Elastic (ELK Stack) read as Elastic Stack

Elastic (ELK Stack/Observability) read as Elastic Stack

Elastic (ELK) read as Elastic Stack

Elastic Cloud read as Elastic Stack

Elasticsearch read as Elastic Stack

Elasticsearch (ELK) read as Elastic Stack

New Relic read as New Relic Logs

Unresolved, counted raw

BusinessLOG

ClickHouse-based architectures

IBM QRadar Log Insights

KloudMate

Discontinued, still offered

No shut-down product was recommended here.

Log management for enterprise buyers

By buyer segment

01The standing

Recommended versus criticized

02What they warned about

03What they cite

Sites the answers cite

Pages the answers cite

04How they answered

05The record

Normalization in this category

Also in it operations and endpoint