3 categories · RankedGraylog
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Log management | IT operations and endpoint | 10% | 3 of 59 | 14% | 37 | accepted challenger |
| SIEM platforms | Security operations | 0% | 15 of 49 | 30% | 10 | criticized challenger |
| Observability platforms | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 32 of 63 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Grafana at 29% |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Especially recommended for mid-market and larger organizations seeking a robust, scalable, and cost-effective centralized log management solution” Mistral Small · Logs · direct prompt · first choice
“Graylog - Best for mid-size teams that want open-source log management with a reasonable UI.” Llama 4 Maverick · Logs · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Graylog if you want open-source with better ease-of-use than ELK” MiniMax M2.5 · Logs · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Graylog (Best Balance for Mid-Sized B2B)” Kimi K2 · Logs · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Had a privilege escalation vulnerability (CVE-2025-53106)... Ensure you're running version 6.2.4 or 6.3.0-rc.2 or later.” MiniMax M2.5 · Logs · negative prompt · soft negative
“Gartner 2024–2025 SIEM Magic Quadrant places these as Niche Players: limited vision/execution for broad log management” Grok 4.1 Fast · Logs · negative prompt · soft negative
“Avoid: Graylog versions < 7.1 ... Ensure you are strictly on Graylog 7.1 (supported through May 2027)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Logs · negative prompt · soft negative
“users complain about limited visualization/dashboards, steep initial setup, and non-intuitive reporting” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SIEM · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 98 of the 117 answers that named Graylog and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
333 of the 333 domain citations in answers naming Graylog came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as Graylog
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Graylog's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Graylog, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at graylog.org is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.