IT AI Index
Index Vendors › CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale · September 2026 Edition
CrowdStrike · 1 category · Named, not ranked

CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale

9Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
8 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale was named 1 time in Logs, where Datadog Log Management led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In logs · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Log managementIT operations and endpoint0%48 of 59100%1under 10 labels · led by Datadog Log Management at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500011

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“A critical path traversal vulnerability (CVE-2026-40050) could have allowed unauthenticated file access.” MiniMax M2.5 · Logs · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Datadog Log Management6 of 90Not in the top three
Microsoft Sentinel5 of 93Not in the top three
Splunk5 of 92Not in the top three
Sumo Logic5 of 91Not in the top three
Grafana Loki4 of 91Not in the top three
Elastic Stack4 of 90Not in the top three
Coralogix3 of 90Not in the top three
Elastic Security3 of 90Not in the top three
Google Security Operations3 of 90Not in the top three
Splunk Enterprise Security2 of 92Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 9 answers that named CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

exabeam.com4
coralogix.com3
expertinsights.com3
gartner.com3
toolradar.com3
underdefense.com3
aspcstorageprd.blob.core.windows.net2
cribl.io2
cubeapm.com2
insidecyber.ai2

Twenty-seven of the twenty-seven domain citations in answers naming CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale; a claim can dispute any of them.
CrowdStrike LogScale 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at crowdstrike.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack