Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
CrowdStrike · 2 categories · Named, not rankedCrowdStrike Falcon LogScale
12Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale was named 3 times in Logs and 1 other category, where Datadog Log Management led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market24 of 73
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise9 of 66
2%8 labels
under the label threshold
In logs · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Log management | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 24 of 73 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Datadog Log Management at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| SIEM platforms | Security operations | 0% | 39 of 61 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Sentinel at 38% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Logs · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 47 → 24 of 66
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 19 → 7 of 62
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Logs | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 47 → 24 of 73 |
| SIEM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 23 → 39 of 61 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labels1
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative2 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Modern, Cost-Efficient SaaS | Axiom, Better Stack, Coralogix, CrowdStrike LogScale” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Logs · scale prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 12 answers that named CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
openobserve.ai6
splunk.com5
coralogix.com4
cribl.io4
datadoghq.com4
exabeam.com4
solarwinds.com4
crowdstrike.comYour site3
dupple.com3
github.com3
Thirty-seven of the forty domain citations in answers naming CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 140 a month (“crowdstrike falcon logscale”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 3 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on CrowdStrike's site (crowdstrike.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 24 of 73 in logs
Segment leader
28%
Datadog Log Management
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 12 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 12 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale; a claim can dispute any of them.
CrowdStrike LogScale 2
Follow CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
CrowdStrike is the company behind CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale.ShowHide
The company
CrowdStrike is the company behind CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from CrowdStrike
- CrowdStrike Adaptive Shield, CrowdStrike Adversary Intelligence, CrowdStrike Charlotte AI, CrowdStrike Charlotte AI / AgentWorks, CrowdStrike Charlotte AI Detection Triage, CrowdStrike Falcon, CrowdStrike Falcon Adversary Intelligence, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security and 19 more
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Join leading organizations by augmenting or replacing your security information and event management (SIEM) solution with Falcon LogScale for unbeatable scale and performance. With its unique index-free architecture and advanced compression technology, Falcon LogScale empowers you to stop breaches by delivering high-speed search and sub-second latency for live dashboards and real-time alerting.
- For
- leading organizations
- Price stated
- cut costs by up to 80% compared to legacy SIEM solutions crowdstrike.com/tech-hub/ng-siem/crowdstrike-falcon-logscale-s3-ingest
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: crowdstrike.com/services/falcon-logscale, crowdstrike.com/services/falcon-operational-support, crowdstrike.com/partners/crowdstrike-falcons-program, crowdstrike.com/tech-hub/ng-siem/crowdstrike-falcon-logscale-s3-ingest, crowdstrike.com/tech-hub/ng-siem/getting-value-from-your-proxy-logs-with-falcon-logscale. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.