AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Cribl Stream · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Cribl Stream

131Judge labels
34First choices
9Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
44% in Telemetry pipelines for enterprise buyers
Rank 2 of 124 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 6% of its 32 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Cribl Stream →
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In telemetry pipelines · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Cribl Stream for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Telemetry pipelinesIT operations and endpoint17%2 of 1246%32accepted challenger
Log managementIT operations and endpoint0%18 of 730%9under 10 labels · led by Datadog Log Management at 28%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Cribl Stream yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Cribl Stream across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501102
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash22105
Perplexity Sonar20002
Grok 4.2012104
Mistral Small01102
DeepSeek V4 Flash02316
Llama 4 Maverick10102
Qwen 3.7 Flash02002
Kimi K221115
GLM 4.7 FlashX20002
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna02002
Muse Glimmer 30B22105

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct21 labels9
Paraphrase24 labels15
Comparative41 labels12not counted in share
Budget-constrained14 labels6
Scale-constrained19 labels4
Negative12 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative131 labels in all, every segment counted; 34 of the 47 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“A dedicated pipeline layer (Cribl, Mezmo, etc.) or a well-managed OTel + Vector setup usually hits the sweet spot of control without massive overhead.” Kimi K2 · Telemetry pipelines · scale prompt · first choice
“The best telemetry pipeline for a company with a limited budget is Cribl Stream, as it is ranked #1 of 28 and has a rating of 9.1/10.” Llama 4 Maverick · Telemetry pipelines · budget prompt · first choice
“a commercial tool like Cribl often pays for itself via rapid deployment and massive data reduction” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Telemetry pipelines · scale prompt · first choice
“Cribl Stream ranks highest overall... Often ranked #1 for general-purpose observability pipelines” Perplexity Sonar · Telemetry pipelines · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Caveat: It is enterprise-priced. For a mid-sized B2B, the ROI usually only makes sense if you are spending significantly on observability backends” Kimi K2 · Telemetry pipelines · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“it's overkill for most mid-sized B2B companies” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Telemetry pipelines · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Cribl Stream, over the 131 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cribl Stream was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Datadog37 of 1311Not among the top eight
Splunk Observability Cloud33 of 1310Not among the top eight
Dynatrace25 of 1311Not among the top eight
Datadog Log Management23 of 1314Not among the top eight
Chronosphere Telemetry Pipeline23 of 1311Not among the top eight
Edge Delta21 of 1311Not among the top eight
Elastic Stack21 of 1311Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Cribl Stream. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 128 of the 131 answers that named Cribl Stream and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cribl.ioYour site100
itechguides.com42
external.pi.gpi.aws.gartner.com38
edgedelta.com35
openobserve.ai35
g2.com31
coralogix.com30
zipdo.co29
opentelemetry.io27
motadata.com26

293 of the 393 domain citations in answers naming Cribl Stream came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

cribl.io ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Cribl Stream takes 17% of first choices and OpenTelemetry Collector takes 37%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “telemetry pipeline”
3
Position for “telemetry pipelines”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
260 a month (“cribl stream”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
15 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 17,616 a month
Searches its site ranks for
2,577 · 250 in the top three
Sites linking to it
3,034
Paid Google search
1 searches its ads show for, about 1 clicks and $19 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
47 ads · 47 text · 20 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2024, as Cribl, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 35 in the year, 12 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
17%
rank 2 of 124 in telemetry pipelines
Segment leader
37%
OpenTelemetry Collector
First choices
34 across its categories
Named in
131 answers
Its own site cited
in 128 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on cribl.io
12,063
subdomains included
Content
1,797
counted in the table below
Documentation
9,956
Product · Integration
62 · 114
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog1,522402026-09-27SIEM, Logs
News or press9632026-08-19SIEM, XDR
Glossary or explainer8132026-08-26Logs, SIEM
Comparison3412026-09-11SIEM, Logs
Conference or event2102025-09-29
Webinar or virtual event1402022-03-28
Report or ebook1302026-05-20
Podcast or video1302023-05-25
Template or tool202023-12-22
Case study102025-01-01

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on cribl.io state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page cribl.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SIEM (39); 9 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Cribl Stream

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Cribl Stream; a claim can dispute any of them.
Cribl 15Cribl (Stream + Edge) 1Cribl Stream / Edge 1Cribl Stream / Lake 1

Follow Cribl Stream

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Cribl Stream is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Event Stream Processing
For
IT and security teams
Price stated
Price based on GBs of data ingested. cribl.io/pricing/lake
Free plan or trial
Process up to 1TB/day, no license required. cribl.io
Integrations claimed
150 cribl.io
Customers named
SA Power NetworksServiceNowNutanixCox AutomotiveHughes Network SystemsSally BeautyPegasystemsCribl
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, certifications, hosting

What Cribl Stream's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: cribl.io, cribl.io/pricing/lake, trust.cribl.io, cribl.io/platform, cribl.io/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cribl Stream's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cribl Stream, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Cribl Stream by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Cribl Stream is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Cribl Stream, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cribl.io is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Cribl Stream is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide

Cribl Stream is among the products AI models recommend first in Telemetry pipelines this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Among AI models' top three in Telemetry pipelines, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/operations/telemetry-pipelines/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/cribl-stream--telemetry-pipelines-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Telemetry pipelines, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Telemetry pipelines standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Among AI models' top three in Telemetry pipelines, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/operations/telemetry-pipelines/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/cribl-stream--telemetry-pipelines-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Telemetry pipelines, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Telemetry pipelines standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Among AI models' top three in Telemetry pipelines, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/operations/telemetry-pipelines/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/cribl-stream--telemetry-pipelines-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Telemetry pipelines, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Telemetry pipelines standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.