7 categories · RankedDynatrace
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infrastructure monitoring | IT operations and endpoint | 2% | 9 of 65 | 30% | 37 | criticized challenger |
| Application performance monitoring | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 22 of 70 | 42% | 45 | criticized challenger |
| Observability platforms | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 10 of 63 | 32% | 41 | criticized challenger |
| Log management | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 20 of 59 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Datadog Log Management at 20% |
| Error and crash monitoring | Developer platform | 0% | 26 of 44 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Sentry at 82% |
| Cloud cost management | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 57 of 79 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Vantage at 54% |
| LLM gateways and observability | Data platform | 0% | 26 of 63 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by LiteLLM at 38% |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 9 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 12 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 13 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 10 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 14 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 8 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 10 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 11 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 15 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 11 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 10 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Dynatrace for large enterprises wanting AI-powered insights with minimal setup effort” Kimi K2 · Infra monitoring · comparative prompt · first choice
“under Observability Platforms, where Dynatrace leads... Cloud-heavy? Go Datadog/Dynatrace.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Infra monitoring · comparative prompt · first choice
“The gold standard for enterprise automation and heavy-duty, high-compliance environments.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Observability · comparative prompt · first choice
“Large/complex enterprise that wants automation → Dynatrace (AI root cause, topology)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · APM · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Most expensive at scale among commercial APMs ... Memory-based pricing makes bills unpredictable” Kimi K2 · APM · negative prompt · hard negative
“Proprietary OneAgent instrumentation creates vendor lock-in ... Opaque pricing” Kimi K2 · Observability · negative prompt · hard negative
“Dynatrace is built primarily for massive enterprises with legacy environments” Gemini 3.5 Flash · APM · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise like Dynatrace: Overkill and pricey.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Observability · budget prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 318 of the 402 answers that named Dynatrace and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
867 of the 867 domain citations in answers naming Dynatrace came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Dynatrace's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Dynatrace, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at dynatrace.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.