Every category where a model named Dynatrace for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
AIOps platforms	IT operations and endpoint	13%	3 of 93	27%	49	criticized challenger
Application performance monitoring	IT operations and endpoint	2%	11 of 66	48%	50	criticized challenger	▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Observability platforms	IT operations and endpoint	2%	7 of 80	28%	40	criticized challenger	▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Infrastructure monitoring	IT operations and endpoint	0%	69 of 79	45%	38	criticized challenger	▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Website and synthetic monitoring	IT operations and endpoint	0%	59 of 67	47%	19	criticized challenger
Log management	IT operations and endpoint	0%	30 of 73	25%	8	under 10 labels · led by Datadog Log Management at 28%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Network monitoring and management	Network and edge	0%	19 of 78	14%	7	under 10 labels · led by Auvik at 26%
Telemetry pipelines	IT operations and endpoint	0%	122 of 124	71%	7	under 10 labels · led by OpenTelemetry Collector at 37%
Data quality and observability	Data platform	0%	95 of 110	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Metaplane at 31%
Error and crash monitoring	Developer platform	0%	41 of 42	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by Sentry at 76%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Time series databases	Data platform	0%	27 of 66	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by TimescaleDB at 63%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Dynatrace yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Dynatrace across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	2	2	5	5	14
GPT-5.4 mini	2	9	1	2	14
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	4	3	15	22
Perplexity Sonar	1	5	3	3	12
Grok 4.20	1	6	7	12	26
Mistral Small	2	2	8	3	15
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	6	7	15
Llama 4 Maverick	1	3	6	2	12
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	7	4	10	23
Kimi K2	2	3	4	11	20
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	2	4	4	12
MiniMax M2.5	1	3	3	6	13
GPT-6 Luna	1	2	2	1	6
Muse Glimmer 30B	3	5	7	4	19

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct118 labels37

Paraphrase121 labels36

Comparative183 labels45not counted in share

Budget-constrained75 labels11

Scale-constrained97 labels6

Negative175 labels9not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative769 labels in all, every segment counted; 90 of the 144 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Dynatrace if: You want a "all-in-one" solution where you don't need third-party monitors, and you require automated code-level root cause identification.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · AIOps · comparative prompt · first choice

“Dynatrace and BigPanda are often recommended due to their scalability, ease of integration, and strong noise reduction features” Mistral Small · AIOps · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Dynatrace is the best overall AIOps platform due to its robust features, strong user ratings, and suitability for mid-market needs” Mistral Small · AIOps · direct prompt · first choice

“A practical starting point for most mid-market B2B companies is to trial Dynatrace or Datadog/New Relic for observability-first AIOps” Muse Glimmer 30B · AIOps · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Platforms to Avoid (For Now) ... Dynatrace is exceptionally precise, but its premium pricing and complex configuration require dedicated platform engineering teams” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AIOps · direct prompt · hard negative

“Avoid: Writing code that sends telemetry directly to third-party APIs (e.g., sending logs straight to Splunk Cloud, Datadog, or Dynatrace APIs).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Telemetry pipelines · negative prompt · hard negative

“Verdict: Avoid unless you are a large enterprise with a dedicated Site Reliability Engineering (SRE) team” Qwen 3.7 Flash · APM · negative prompt · hard negative

“Dynatrace is expensive at scale ... Memory-based pricing is unintuitive and budget-hostile” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Infra monitoring · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Dynatrace, over the 769 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Dynatrace was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

New Relic437 of 76958Compare →

Datadog394 of 76975Compare →

Datadog APM148 of 76921Not among the top eight

AppDynamics140 of 7692Not among the top eight

Splunk138 of 7696Not among the top eight

Grafana129 of 76919Compare →

Splunk Observability Cloud124 of 7692Not among the top eight

Zabbix106 of 7699Not among the top eight

BigPanda92 of 7697Compare →

SigNoz91 of 76914Compare →

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Dynatrace. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 700 of the 769 answers that named Dynatrace and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

motadata.com349

newrelic.com262

g2.com234

middleware.io189

openobserve.ai177

guideflow.com148

learn.g2.com146

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com139

uptrace.dev135

coralogix.com131

1,910 of the 1,910 domain citations in answers naming Dynatrace came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

motadata.com/blog/aiops-platforms103

motadata.com/blog/best-apm-tools78

g2.com/categories/aiops-platforms67

motadata.com/blog/best-it-infrastructure-monitoring-tools64

openobserve.ai/blog/top-10-aiops-platforms59

uptrace.dev/tools/top-observability-tools59

ir.com/guides/top-observability-tools-comparison-2026-smbs-vs-enterprise-platforms56

middleware.io/blog/apm-tools54

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

dynatrace.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Dynatrace takes 13% of first choices and New Relic takes 17%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “aiops platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “aiops platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 22,200 a month (“dynatrace”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 1,106 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 62,738 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 11,215 · 976 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 14,570
Paid Google search: 7 searches its ads show for, about 119 clicks and $3,941 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

120+ ads · 52 image, 51 text, 17 video · 120 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as Dynatrace LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 92 in the year, 28 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

13%

rank 3 of 93 in aiops

Segment leader

17%

New Relic

First choices: 90 across its categories
Named in: 769 answers
Its own site cited: in 700 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on dynatrace.com

12,045

subdomains included

Content

2,803

counted in the table below

Documentation

4,981

Product · Integration

125 · 130

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
News or press	1,870	65	2026-09-25
Report or ebook	424	20	2026-09-28
Webinar or virtual event	168	20	2026-09-25
Case study	131	19	2026-09-28
Blog	98	39	2026-09-28
Conference or event	54	10	2026-09-28
Glossary or explainer	34	4	2026-09-23
Comparison	23	6	2026-09-09
Template or tool	1	undated

Most recent

2026-09-28Bmo case study
2026-09-28Zurich north america case study
2026-09-28Adt case study
2026-09-28Notebooks report or ebook
2026-09-28Servicenow world forum london conference or event
2026-09-285 reasons customers switch from splunk to dynatrace 20029328 blog

Events in person

Upcoming

December 3, 2026ServiceNow World Forum – ParisParis Expo Porte de Versailles, Paris, France · exhibits

As the event pages on dynatrace.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page dynatrace.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Dynatrace

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Dynatrace; a claim can dispute any of them.

Dynatrace (Davis AI) 2

Follow Dynatrace

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Dynatrace is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Observability built for the age of AI
dynatrace.com
For: today’s digital businesses
dynatrace.com
Price stated: Reduce costs with clear, simple pricing dynatrace.com
Starting price: 0 dynatrace.com
Free plan or trial: 15-day free trial dynatrace.com
Integrations claimed: 900 dynatrace.com/pricing
Certifications: ISO 27001SOC 2 Type IIFedRAMP ModerateHIPAAACNCCPACSADESC CSP Security Standard
Hosting: across our global data center footprint
Customers named: Air France-KLMADTNextWeLab BankVirgin MoneyAgosFreedomPayBMO

What Dynatrace's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: dynatrace.com, dynatrace.com/pricing, trust.dynatrace.com, dynatrace.com/platform, dynatrace.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Dynatrace's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Dynatrace, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Dynatrace by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Dynatrace is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Dynatrace, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Dynatrace is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.

ShowHide

Dynatrace is among the products AI models recommend first in AIOps platforms this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges

Show the code

<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/operations/aiops-platforms/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/dynatrace--aiops-platforms-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in AIOps platforms, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the AIOps platforms standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides

Show the code

<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/operations/aiops-platforms/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/dynatrace--aiops-platforms-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in AIOps platforms, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the AIOps platforms standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer

Show the code

<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/operations/aiops-platforms/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/dynatrace--aiops-platforms-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in AIOps platforms, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the AIOps platforms standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.