Zero trust network access for enterprise buyers
Asked as “ZTNA solution”, and as “zero trust remote access tool to replace a VPN”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 57 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
53%
Clear leader
53Zscaler Private Access12Cloudflare One11Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access25others
53% of first choices, clear leader.
Since September 2026▼−6Since September 2026: 57% → 51%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Zscaler Private Access held the lead, −6 points on 57%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Cloudflare One58%Clear leader▼−2Since September 2026: 60% → 58%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-market
Twingate39%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Twingate (40%) replaces Cloudflare One (42% then, 33% now), 7 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Enterprise
Zscaler Private Access53%Clear leader▼−6Since September 2026: 57% → 51%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This page
Cloudflare One58%Clear leader▼−2Since September 2026: 60% → 58%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketTwingate39%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Twingate (40%) replaces Cloudflare One (42% then, 33% now), 7 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseZscaler Private Access53%Clear leader▼−6Since September 2026: 57% → 51%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Zscaler Private Access53%14%63endorsed leader▼−6Since September 2026: 57% → 51%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.57% → 51%
Zscaler Private Access53%14%63endorsed leader▼−6Since September 2026: 57% → 51%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.57% → 51%02Cloudflare One12%2%60accepted challenger▼−21Since September 2026: 31% → 10%, −21 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.31% → 10%
Cloudflare One12%2%60accepted challenger▼−21Since September 2026: 31% → 10%, −21 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.31% → 10%03
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access11%12%51accepted challenger▲+7Since September 2026: 5% → 12%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 12%
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access11%12%51accepted challenger▲+7Since September 2026: 5% → 12%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 12%04
Microsoft Entra Private Access5%0%21accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 6%
Microsoft Entra Private Access5%0%21accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 6%05
Netskope Private Access4%8%36accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%
Netskope Private Access4%8%36accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%06Twingate2%24%17accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Twingate2%24%17accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
08
Cisco Secure Access0%20%15accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Cisco Secure Access0%20%15accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%07
Fortinet Universal ZTNA0%0%12accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Fortinet Universal ZTNA0%0%12accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Twingate vs OpenVPN CloudConnexaTwingate vs Zscaler Private AccessTwingate vs TailscaleTwingate vs Check Point Harmony SASECloudflare One vs Cato NetworksCloudflare One vs NordLayerCloudflare One vs OpenVPN CloudConnexaCloudflare One vs Zscaler Private AccessCloudflare One vs TailscaleCloudflare One vs Check Point Harmony SASECato Networks vs NordLayerCato Networks vs OpenVPN CloudConnexaCato Networks vs Zscaler Private AccessCato Networks vs TailscaleCato Networks vs Check Point Harmony SASENordLayer vs OpenVPN CloudConnexaNordLayer vs Zscaler Private AccessNordLayer vs TailscaleNordLayer vs Check Point Harmony SASEOpenVPN CloudConnexa vs Zscaler Private AccessOpenVPN CloudConnexa vs TailscaleOpenVPN CloudConnexa vs Check Point Harmony SASEZscaler Private Access vs TailscaleZscaler Private Access vs Check Point Harmony SASETailscale vs Check Point Harmony SASE
One product takes 53% of first choices here, so the chart would put seven markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Zero products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Five of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Zscaler Private Access14%
9 of 63 labels negative · 7 of 14 models
“SAML signature validation failure (CVE-2025-54982); auth bypass via forged tokens... renewal price hikes (10-20%) painful for large budgets.” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access12%
6 of 51 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“pricing and licensing complexity that is notoriously difficult to navigate, with limited value outside the Palo Alto ecosystem” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Tailscale62%
5 of 8 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid buying: ... Developer-first tools (Tailscale, Twingate) if you need enterprise compliance and centralized governance” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Twingate24%
4 of 17 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Developer-first tools (Tailscale, Twingate) if you need enterprise compliance and centralized governance” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
80 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1187 links across 266 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 28 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
40 answers · 40 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Portnox33 answers · 39 citations · 12 models
28 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
26 answers · 27 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Zscaler25 answers · 39 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Akamai24 answers · 25 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Venn23 answers · 32 citations · 11 models
23 answers · 31 citations · 11 models
vendor site · CyberPress22 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
21 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Guideflow20 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Fortinet19 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
40 answers · 11 models
29 answers · 12 models
28 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 11 models
23 answers · 8 models
20 answers · 9 models
20 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best ztna solution”, “ztna solution”, “ztna solutions”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zscaler zscaler.com Zscaler Private Access 53% | 53% | 195 | 60,500 | 3,104 | 103,886 company | $9,116 | 66 | 1 |
| Cloudflare parent site Cloudflare One 12% | 12% | 372 | 550,000 | 10,897 | ||||
| Palo Alto Networks parent site Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access 11% | 11% | 115 | 40,500 | 1,088 | ||||
| Zscaler parent site Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange 5%, Zscaler Internet Access 2% | 7% | 154 | 60,500 | 3,104 | ||||
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Entra Private Access 5% | 5% | 33 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||||
| Netskope netskope.com Netskope Private Access 4%, Netskope One 0% | 4% | 112 | 18,100 | 830 | 42,119 company | 27 | ||
| Akamai parent site Akamai Enterprise Application Access 4% | 4% | 12 | 27,100 | 1,614 | ||||
| Twingate twingate.com | 2% | 139 | 9,900 | 126 | 119,706 | 5 | ||
| Cloudflare Zero Trust Access | 2% | |||||||
| Fortinet parent site Fortinet FortiGate 2%, Fortinet Universal ZTNA 0% | 2% | 184 | 49,500 | 2,339 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (fortinet.com, portnox.com, venn.com, zscaler.com). The first result for “best ztna solution” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best ZTNA solution for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which zero trust remote access tool to replace a VPN would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade ZTNA solutions and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best ZTNA solution for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a ZTNA solution. What should we look at?”Negative“Which ZTNA solutions should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Zscaler Private AccessZscaler Private AccessHeldCloudflare One, Microsoft Entra Private Access, Zscaler Zero Trust ExchangeZscaler Private Accessno first choiceagainst: Cloudflare One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
Three alternatives
Cloudflare One, Microsoft Entra Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessThree alternatives
Cloudflare One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, TwingateTwo alternatives
Cisco Secure Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessOne alternative
Check Point Harmony SASEGPT-5.4 miniZscaler Private AccessZscaler Private AccessHeldZscaler Private AccessCloudflare Zero Trust Accessagainst: Palo Alto Networks Prisma Accessno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Cloudflare One, Microsoft Entra Private AccessOne alternative
Microsoft Entra Private AccessFive alternatives
Cisco Secure Access, Cloudflare One, Microsoft Entra Private Access, Netskope Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessOne alternative
Zscaler Private AccessGemini 3.5 FlashZscaler Private AccessCloudflare One, Zscaler Private AccessChangedZscaler Private AccessTwingateagainst: Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Zscaler Private Accessno first choiceagainst: Zscaler Private Accessnothing named
Four alternatives
Cloudflare One, Netskope Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, TwingateTwo alternatives
Netskope One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessFour alternatives
Cloudflare One, Fortinet Universal ZTNA, Netskope Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessThree alternatives
Appgate SDP, Fortinet Universal ZTNA, TailscaleFour alternatives
Cloudflare One, Netskope One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, TwingatePerplexity SonarZscaler Zero Trust ExchangeZscaler Private Access, Zscaler Zero Trust ExchangeChangedZscaler Private AccessFortinet FortiGateagainst: Zscaler Private Accessno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Cloudflare One, Microsoft Entra Private AccessTwo alternatives
Cloudflare One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessFive alternatives
Cisco Secure Access, Cloudflare One, Fortinet Universal ZTNA, Microsoft Entra Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessOne alternative
Cloudflare OneGrok 4.1 FastZscaler Private AccessZscaler Private AccessHeldagainst: Tailscale, TwingateZscaler Private Accessagainst: Cato Networks, Check Point Harmony SASE, Fortinet FortiSASE, Skyhigh SecurityZscaler Private AccessPalo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Zscaler Private Accessagainst: Akamai Enterprise Application Access, Check Point Harmony SASE, Cisco Secure Access, Netskope Private Access, Tailscale, Twingate, Zscaler Private Access
Three alternatives
Cloudflare One, Netskope Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessThree alternatives
Cloudflare One, Netskope Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessFour alternatives
Cisco Secure Access, Cloudflare One, Netskope Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessThree alternatives
Cloudflare One, Netskope Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessThree alternatives
Cato Networks, Cloudflare One, Netskope Private AccessMistral SmallZscaler Private AccessAkamai Enterprise Application Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessChangedCloudflare One, Zscaler Private Accessagainst: Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessZscaler Private Accessagainst: Cato Networks, Netskope Private Accessno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Cloudflare One, Fortinet Universal ZTNA, Netskope Private AccessOne alternative
Cloudflare OneTwo alternatives
Cato Networks Universal ZTNA, Netskope Private AccessOne alternative
Cloudflare OneDeepSeek V4 FlashNetskope Private Access, Zscaler Private AccessZscaler Private AccessChangedZscaler Private AccessCloudflare Oneagainst: Zscaler Private Accessno first choiceagainst: Akamai ZTNA, Check Point Harmony SASE, Tailscale, Twingate, Zscaler Private Access
Two alternatives
Cloudflare One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessFour alternatives
Cloudflare One, Microsoft Entra Private Access, Netskope Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessEight alternatives
Appgate SDP, Cisco Secure Access, Cloudflare One, Fortinet FortiSASE, Netskope Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Teleport, TwingateOne alternative
TwingateLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceZscaler Private AccessChangedno first choiceZscaler Private Accessno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Cloudflare One, Prisma Access, TwingateThree alternatives
Cloudflare One, Microsoft Entra Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessQwen 3.7 FlashPalo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Zscaler Private AccessZscaler Internet Access, Zscaler Private AccessChangedZscaler Private AccessCloudflare One, Microsoft Entra Private Accessno first choiceagainst: Tailscale
Three alternatives
Cisco, Microsoft Entra Private Access, Netskope Private AccessFour alternatives
Cisco Secure Access, Cloudflare One, Okta Secure Access, Prisma AccessSix alternatives
Cisco, Cloudflare One, Fortinet Universal ZTNA, Microsoft, Netskope Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessOne alternative
Zscaler Private AccessKimi K2Netskope Private Access, Zscaler Private AccessZscaler Private AccessChangedZscaler Private AccessAkamai Enterprise Application Access, Microsoft Entra Private Accessagainst: Netskope Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Zscaler Private AccessCloudflare One, Zscaler Private Accessagainst: Tailscale, Twingateagainst: Cisco Secure Access
Two alternatives
Cisco Secure Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessThree alternatives
Cloudflare One, Microsoft Entra Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessFive alternatives
Cisco Secure Access, Cloudflare One, Fortinet FortiSASE, Netskope Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessOne alternative
Cloudflare OneThree alternatives
Fortinet Universal ZTNA, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, ibossGLM 4.7 FlashXPalo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Zscaler Private AccessZscaler Private AccessChangedZscaler Private AccessCloudflare Oneno first choiceagainst: Check Point Harmony SASE, Check Point – Harmony SASE / Perimeter 81, Cisco Secure Access, Fortinet FortiSASE, Netskope – Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Zscaler – ZPA / ZIA
Three alternatives
Cisco Secure Access, Cloudflare One, Netskope Private AccessTwo alternatives
Cloudflare One, Microsoft Entra ID + IntuneFour alternatives
Cloudflare One, Fortinet Universal ZTNA, Microsoft Entra Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessOne alternative
Zscaler Private AccessMiniMax M2.5Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Zscaler Zero Trust ExchangePalo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Zscaler Private AccessChangedZscaler Private AccessMicrosoft Entra Private Accessno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Akamai Enterprise Application Access, Cisco Umbrella, Cloudflare OneTwo alternatives
Cloudflare One, Netskope Private AccessThree alternatives
Cisco Duo, Cloudflare One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessTwo alternatives
Cloudflare One, Zscaler Private AccessGPT-6 LunaZscaler Private AccessZscaler Private AccessHeldno first choiceCloudflare Oneagainst: Zscaler Private Accessno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Cloudflare One, Netskope Private Access, Prisma AccessOne alternative
Microsoft Entra Private AccessOne alternative
TwingateMuse Glimmer 30BZscaler Private AccessZscaler Private AccessHeldZscaler Private Access, ZPACloudflare Oneno first choiceagainst: Zscaler Private Access
Three alternatives
Cloudflare One, Netskope Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessTwo alternatives
Cloudflare One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessThree alternatives
Cloudflare One, Netskope Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessTwo alternatives
Microsoft Entra Private Access, Zscaler Private AccessBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:27 | yes | 14 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:48 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:21 | yes | 15 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:40 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:23 | yes | 24 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:26 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 13:01 | yes | 20 | 74 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:43 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:47 | no | 0 | 41 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:13 | yes | 19 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:24 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:44 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:10 | yes | 4 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:08 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:46 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:06 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:58 | yes | 11 | 34 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:58 | yes | 19 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 13:28 | yes | 22 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:15 | yes | 11 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:13 | yes | 23 | 37 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:20 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:12 | yes | 10 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:33 | yes | 18 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:28 | yes | 25 | 232 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:07 | yes | 15 | 34 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:35 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:44 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:48 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:24 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:35 | yes | 24 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 13:07 | yes | 19 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:45 | yes | 23 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:27 | yes | 19 | 13 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:57 | yes | 24 | 64 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:38 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:19 | yes | 12 | 51 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 07:53 | yes | 20 | 29 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:43 | yes | 23 | 40 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:05 | yes | 10 | 22 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:12 | yes | 8 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:45 | yes | 24 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:57 | yes | 14 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:45 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:05 | yes | 23 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:27 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:58 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:45 | yes | 25 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:45 | yes | 25 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:09 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:08 | yes | 10 | 40 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 07:52 | yes | 24 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:31 | yes | 24 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:16 | yes | 16 | 41 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:20 | yes | 3 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:17 | yes | 14 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:12 | yes | 18 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:56 | no | 0 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:55 | yes | 12 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:43 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:42 | yes | 24 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:19 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:47 | yes | 23 | 53 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 13:52 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:54 | no | 0 | 38 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:14 | yes | 18 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:57 | yes | 21 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:17 | yes | 5 | 47 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:18 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:32 | yes | 12 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:29 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:33 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 12:43 | yes | 18 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:48 | yes | 18 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:51 | yes | 23 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 13:07 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:31 | yes | 23 | 42 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 13:24 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:29 | yes | 15 | 90 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:36 | yes | 22 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:00 | yes | 21 | 76 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:06 | yes | 10 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:43 | yes | 3 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:53 | yes | 20 | 38 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Akamai read as Akamai Enterprise Application Access
Akamai (Symantec ZTNA) read as Akamai Enterprise Application Access
AppGate read as Appgate SDP
Appgate read as Appgate SDP
Cato read as Cato Networks Universal ZTNA
Check Point read as Check Point Harmony SASE
Cloudflare read as Cloudflare One
Cloudflare (Cloudflare One / Zero Trust) read as Cloudflare One
Cloudflare (Cloudflare Zero Trust) read as Cloudflare One
Cloudflare Access read as Cloudflare One
Cloudflare Access (Cloudflare One) read as Cloudflare One
Cloudflare Access (Zero Trust) read as Cloudflare One
Cloudflare Access (part of Cloudflare One) read as Cloudflare One
Cloudflare Access / Cloudflare One read as Cloudflare One
Cloudflare One/Access read as Cloudflare One
Cloudflare Zero Trust / Cloudflare Access read as Cloudflare One
Fortinet read as Fortinet Universal ZTNA
Fortinet (FortiClient) read as Fortinet Universal ZTNA
Microsoft Entra Internet Access + Private Access read as Microsoft Entra Private Access
Netskope read as Netskope Private Access
Netskope (Netskope Private Access / Netskope One) read as Netskope Private Access
Netskope (Netskope Private Access) read as Netskope Private Access
Netskope ZTNA read as Netskope Private Access
Palo Alto read as Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks read as Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks (Prisma Access) read as Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access ZTNA read as Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Zscaler read as Zscaler Private Access
Zscaler (Private Access - ZPA) read as Zscaler Private Access
Zscaler (ZPA + ZIA) read as Zscaler Private Access
Zscaler (Zero Trust Exchange) read as Zscaler Private Access
Zscaler (Zscaler Private Access - ZPA) read as Zscaler Private Access
Zscaler (Zscaler Private Access / Zscaler B2B) read as Zscaler Private Access
Unresolved, counted raw
Akamai ZTNA
Check Point – Harmony SASE / Perimeter 81
Cloudflare Zero Trust Access
Fortinet Zero Trust Network Access
Netskope – Private Access
Okta Secure Access
Symantec ZTNA (by Broadcom)
TerraZone
Zscaler Private Access, ZPA
Zscaler – ZPA / ZIA
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.