| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Next-generation firewalls | Network and edge | 61% | 1 of 100 | 8% | 38 | endorsed leader |
| Zero trust network access | Network and edge | 0% | 54 of 71 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Cloudflare One at 35% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The Overall Best Value & Price-Performance: Fortinet FortiGate ... go with the Fortinet FortiGate. It offers the most future-proof scalability” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Firewalls · direct prompt · first choice
“The Best All-Rounder: Fortinet FortiGate (Series 600) ... market leader for mid-sized businesses because it offers the best price-to-performance ratio” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Firewalls · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For a 500-person company, Fortinet FortiGate is frequently recommended as the sweet spot—enterprise-grade features at mid-market pricing.” Kimi K2 · Firewalls · scale prompt · first choice
“a physical appliance (like Fortinet FortiGate or Sophos) at your edge with virtual firewalls in the cloud would provide the best balance” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Firewalls · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Older models of Fortigate, Palo Alto, and other NGFW devices can become security liabilities if not regularly updated.” Mistral Small · Firewalls · negative prompt · soft negative
“"Caution" in NSS Labs 2025 (79.24% effectiveness). Massive CVE volume (100+ tracked)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Firewalls · negative prompt · soft negative
“Verdict: Caution (High Maintenance)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Firewalls · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 100 of the 110 answers that named Fortinet FortiGate and are not a share of its labels.
339 of the 381 domain citations in answers naming Fortinet FortiGate came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Fortinet FortiGate's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Fortinet FortiGate, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at fortinet.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.